High connectivity among habitats precludes the relationship between dispersal and range size in tropical reef fishes

Ecography

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 89-96

  Mora, Camilo ^a   Treml, Eric A ^d   Roberts, Jason ^e   Crosby, Kate ^a   Roy, Denis ^a   Tittensor, Derek P ^a,b,c  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b United Nations Environment Programme   (United Kingdom)

^c MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^e DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORAL REEF; DEMERSAL FISH; DISPERSAL; FISH; HABITAT TYPE; LIGHT EFFECT; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; OCEANIC CIRCULATION; PELAGIC ENVIRONMENT; RANGE SIZE; TIMESCALE; TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT;

PISCES;

EID: 84855526163     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06874.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allen G. R. and Robertson D. R. 1994. Fishes of the tropical eastern Pacific. - Univ. of Hawaii Press.
2. Allen G. R. et al. 1997. Marine fishes of tropical Australia and south-east Asia, 3rd rev. ed. - Western Australian Museum, Perth.
3. Bellwood D. R. et al. 2004. Evolution and biogeography of marine angelfishes (Pisces: Pomacanthidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33: 140-155.
4. Bellwood D. R. et al. 2010. Evolutionary history of the butterflyfishes (f: Chaetodontidae) and the rise of coral feeding fishes. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 335-349.
5. Carlin J. et al. 2003. Ancient divergences and recent connections in two tropical Atlantic reef fishes Epinephelus adscensionis and Rypticus saponaceous (Percoidei: Serranidae). Mar. Biol. 143: 1057-1069.
6. Castro J. J. et al. 2002. A general theory on fish aggregation to floating objects: an alternative to the meeting point hypothesis. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 11: 255-277.
7. Chassignet E. P. et al. 2009. US GODAE: Global Ocean Prediction with the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM). Oceanography 22: 64-75.
8. Chiba S. N. et al. 2009. Comprehensive phylogeny of the family Sparidae (Perciformes: Teleostei) inferred from mitochondrial gene analyses. Genes Genet. Syst. 84: 153-170.
9. Cooper W. J. et al. 2009. Exploring the radiation of a diverse reef fish family: phylogenetics of the damselfishes (Pomacentridae), with new classifications based on molecular analyses of all genera. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 52: 1-16.
10. Cowman P. F. et al. 2009. Dating the evolutionary origins of wrasse lineages (Labridae) and the rise of trophic novelty on coral reefs. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 52: 621-631.
11. Coyne J. A. and Orr H. A. 2004. Speciation. - Sinauer.
12. Craig M. and Hastings P. A. 2007. A molecular phylogeny of the groupers of the subfamily Epinephelinae (Serranidae) with a revised classification of the Epinephelini. Ichthyol. Res. 54: 1-17.
13. Craig M. T. et al. 2007. High genetic connectivity across the Indian and Pacific oceans in the reef fish Myripristis berndti (Holocentridae). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 334: 245-254.
14. Floeter S. R. et al. 2008. Atlantic reef fish biogeography and evolution. J. Biogeogr. 35: 22-47.
15. Gaston K. J. 2003. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. - Oxford Univ. Press.
16. Goodwin N. B. et al. 2005. Macroecology of live-bearing in fishes: latitudinal and depth range comparisons with egg-laying relatives. Oikos 110: 209-218.
17. Green S. J. and Cote I. M. 2009. Record densities of Indo-Pacific lionfish on Bahamian coral reefs. Coral Reefs 28: 107.
18. Guerrero K. A. and Franco A. L. 2008. First record of the Indo-Pacific red lionfish Pterois volitans (Linnaeus, 1758) for the Dominican Republic. Aquat. Invasions 3: 267-268.
19. Halpern B. S. et al. 2008. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319: 948-952.
20. Horne J. B. et al. 2008. High population connectivity across the Indo-Pacific: congruent lack of phylogeographic structure in three reef fish congeners. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 49: 629-638.
21. Jones G. P. et al. 2002. Rarity in coral reef fish communities. - In: Sale P. F. (ed.), Coral reef fishes: dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic Press, pp. 81-101.
22. Laubach T. and von Haeseler A. 2007. TreeSnatcher: coding trees from images. Bioinformatics 23: 3384-3385.
23. Lessios H. A. and Robertson D. R. 2006. Crossing the impassable: genetic connections in 20 reef fishes across the eastern Pacific barrier. Proc. R. Soc. B 273: 2201-2208.
24. Lester S. E. and Ruttenberg B. I. 2005. The relationship between pelagic larval duration and range size in tropical reef fishes: a synthetic analysis. Proc. R. Soc. B 272: 585-591.
25. Lester S. E. et al. 2007. The relationship between dispersal ability and geographic range size. Ecol. Lett. 10: 745-758.
26. Macpherson E. 2002. Large-scale species richness gradients in the Atlantic Ocean. Proc. R. Soc. B 269: 1715-1720.
27. Marshall D. J. et al. 2010. Phenotype-environment mismatches reduce connectivity in the sea. Ecol. Lett. 13: 128-140.
28. Minegishi Y. et al. 2005. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the freshwater eels genus Anguilla based on the whole mitochondrial genome sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 34: 134-146.
29. Mora C. and Sale P. F. 2002. Are populations of coral reef fishes open or closed? Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 422-428.
30. Mora C. and Robertson D. R. 2005a. Causes of latitudinal gradients in species richness: a test with fishes of the tropical eastern Pacific. Ecology 86: 1771-1782.
31. Mora C. and Robertson D. R. 2005b. Factors shaping the ranges size frequency distribution of fishes in the Tropical Eastern Pacific. J. Biogeogr. 32: 277-286.
32. Mora C. et al. 2001. Dispersal of juvenile and adult reef fishes associated with floating objects and their recruitment into Gorgona Island Reefs, Colombia. Bull. Mar. Sci. 68: 557-561.
33. Mora C. et al. 2003. Patterns and processes in reef fish diversity. Nature 421: 933-936.
34. Mora C. et al. 2006. Coral reefs and the global network of marine protected areas. Science 312: 1750-1751.
35. Mora C. et al. 2008. The completeness of taxonomic inventories for describing the global diversity and distribution of marine fishes. Proc. R. Soc. B 275: 149-155.
36. Oda D. K. and Parrish J. D. 1981. Ecology of commercial snappers and groupers introduced to Hawaian reefs. Proc. 4th Int. Coral Reef Symp. 1: 59-67.
37. Purcell J. et al. 2006. Weak genetic structure indicates strong dispersal limits: a tale of two coral reef fish. Proc. Biol. Sci. 273: 1483-1490.
38. Randall J. E. 1987. Introduction of marine fishes to the Hawaiian Islands. Bull. Mar. Sci. 41: 490-502.
39. Randall J. E. et al. 1990. Fishes of the Great Barrier Reef and Coral Sea. - Univ. of Hawaii Press.
40. Riginos C. and Victor B. C. 2001. Larval spatial distributions and other early life-history characteristics predict genetic differentiation in eastern Pacific blennioid fishes. Proc. R. Soc. B 268: 1931-1936.
41. Roberts J. J. et al. 2010. Marine geospatial ecology tools: an integrated framework for ecological geoprocessing with ArcGIS, Python, R, MATLAB, and C++. Environ. Model. Software 25: 1197-1207.
42. Robertson D. R. 1998. Do coral-reef fish faunas have a distinctive taxonomic structure? Coral Reefs 17: 179-186.
43. Robertson D. R. 2008. Global biogeographical data bases on marine fishes: caveat emptor. Divers. Distrib. 14: 891-892.
44. Rocha L. A. et al. 2002. Adult habitat preferences, larval dispersal, and the comparative phylogeography of three Atlantic surgeonfishes (Teleostei: Acanthuridae). Mol. Ecol. 11: 243-252.
45. Shanks A. L. et al. 2003. Propagule dispersal distance and the size and spacing of marine reserves. Ecol. Appl. 13: S159-S169.
46. Siegel D. et al. 2003. Lagrangian descriptions of marine larval dispersion. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 260: 83-96.
47. Smolarkiewicz A. and Margolin T. 1998. MPDATA: a finite-difference solver for geophysical flows. J. Comput. Phys. 140: 459-480.
48. Stelkens R. et al. 2010. The accumulation of reproductive incompatibilities in African Cichlid fish. Evolution 64: 617-633.
49. Thresher R. E. and Brothers E. B. 1985. Reproductive ecology and biogeography of Indo-West Pacific angelfishes (Pisces: Pomacanthidae). Evolution 23: 878-887.
50. Thresher R. E. and Brothers E. B. 1989. Evidence of intra- and inter-oceanic regional differences in the early life history of reef associated fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 57: 187-205.
51. Thresher R. E. et al. 1989. Planktonic larval duration, distribution and population structure of western and central Pacific damselfishes (Pomacentridae). Copeia 1989: 420-434.
52. Treml E. A. et al. 2008. Modeling population connectivity by ocean currents, a graph-theoretic approach for marine conservation. Landscape Ecol. 23: 19-36.
53. Victor B. C. and Wellington G. M. 2000. Endemism and the pelagic larval duration of reef fishes in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 205: 241-248.
54. Webb T. J. and Gaston K. J. 2000. Geographic range size and evolutionary age in birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 267: 1843-1850.
55. Wellington G. M. and Victor B. C. 1989. Planktonic larval duration of one hundred species of Pacific and Atlantic damselfishes (Pomacentridae). Mar. Biol. 101: 557-568.
56. Wessel P. 2001. Global distribution of seamounts inferred from gridded Geosat/ERS-1 altimetry. J. Geophys. Res. 106: 19431-19441.
57. Whitfield P. E. et al. 2002. Biological invasion of the Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans along the Atlantic coast of North America. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 235: 289-297.
58. Whitfield P. E. et al. 2007. Abundance estimates of the Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans/miles complex in the western north atlantic. Biol. Invasions 9: 53-64.
59. Yesson C. et al. 2011. The global distribution of seamounts based on 30 arc seconds bathymetry data. Deep Sea Res. Part 1 58: 442-453.
60. Zapata F. A. and Herron P. A. 2002. Pelagic larval duration and geographic distribution of tropical eastern Pacific snappers (Pisces: Lutjanidae). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 230: 295-300.