Goal-based daylighting design using an interactive simulation method

IBPSA 2009 - International Building Performance Simulation Association 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 936-943

  Lee, Jaime ^a   Andersen, Marilyne ^a   Sheng, Yu ^b   Cutler, Barbara ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DAYLIGHTING DESIGN; DESIGN MODIFICATIONS; GLOBAL ILLUMINATION; INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS; ITERATIVE DESIGN; ITERATIVE OPTIMIZATION; KNOWLEDGE BASE; LIGHTING SIMULATION; SHADING DEVICES; SIMPLE ALGORITHM; WINDOW SIZE;

DAYLIGHTING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

ITERATIVE METHODS;

EID: 84855513734     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Andersen M., Kleindienst S., Yi L., Lee J., Bodart M., Cutler, B. 2008. An intuitive daylighting performance analysis and optimization approach, Building Research and Information, 36 (6), 593-607.
2. Crow F. 1977. Shadow algorithms for computer graphics, Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 77), 11 (2), 242-248.
3. Cutler B., Sheng Y., Martin S., Glaser D., Andersen M. 2008. Interactive selection of optimal fenestration materials for schematic architectural daylighting design, Automation in Construction, 17 (7), 809-823.
4. Edwards L., Torcellini P. 2002. A literature review of the effects of natural light on building occupants. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
5. Galasiu A., Reinhart, C. 2008. Current daylighting design practice: a survey, Building Research and Information, 36 (2), 159-174.
6. Goral C., Torrance K., Greenberg D., Battaile B. 1984. Modelling the interaction of light between diffuse surfaces, Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1984), 18 (3), 213-222.
7. Heidmann T. 1991. Real shadows, real time, Iris Universe, 18, 28-31.
8. Jung T., Gross M., Do, E. 2003. Light Pen, sketching light in 3D, Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures, Tainan, Taiwan.
9. Kleindeinst S., Bodart M., Andersen, M. 2008. Graphical representation of climate-based daylight performance to support architectural design, Leukos, 5 (1), 39-61.
10. Lee J., Andersen M. 2009. A simulation-based expert system for interactive daylighting design, Proceedings of Lux Europa 2009, Istanbul, Turkey.
11. Luger G. 2004. Artificial Intelligence: Structures and Strategies for Complex Problem Solving, 5th ed., Boston: Addison Wesley.
12. Montgomery D. 2004. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 6th ed., John Wiley & Sons.
13. Paule B., Scartezzini J. 1997. Leso-DIAL, a new computer-based daylighting design tool, Right Light, 4 (1), 93-97.
14. Rashid M., Zimring C. 2008. A review of the empirical literature on the relationships between indoor environment and stress in health care and office settings: Problems and prospects of sharing evidence, Environment and Behavior, 40 (2), 151-190.
15. Reinhart C. 2005. A simulation-based review of the ubiquitous window-head-height to daylit zone depth rule-of-thumb, Proceedings of Building Simulation 2005, Montreal, Canada.
16. Reinhart C., Fitz A. 2006. Findings from a survey on the current use of daylight simulations in building design, Energy & Buildings, 38 (7), 824-835.
17. Sarawgi T. 2006. Survey on the use of lighting design software in architecture and interior design undergraduate education, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 4 (4), 91-108.
18. Ward G. 1994. The radiance lighting simulation and rendering system, Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 94), 459-472.