The Efficacy of the Total Giftedness Development Model

Gifted and Talented International

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 77-90

  Batterjee, Adel A ^a  

^a NONE   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

creativity; Giftedness; intelligence; multiple identification method; Saudi Arabia; total giftedness development model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855508471     PISSN: 15332276     EISSN: 24709565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2010.11673571     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Alburadi, A., (2006). Towards the construction of an Arabic program for the technical and applied qualifications in creativity and giftedness. A paper presented to the Regional Scientific Conference for Giftedness, 2630/8/2006. Jeddah: Saudi Arabia.
2. Aldebaban, M., (1979). Enrichment program in science. Riyadh: King Abdul-Aziz City for Science & Technology.
3. Alnafi, A., Alqatiai, A., Aldebaban, S., Alhazmy, M., & Alsulaim, J., (1979). Program for the identification and nurturing of the gifted. Riyadh: King Abdul-Aziz City for Science & Technology.
4. Alnafi, A., Alqatiai, A., Aldebaban, S., Alhazmy, M., & Alsulaim, J., (2000). Program for the identification and nurturing of the gifted. Riyadh: King Abdul-Aziz City for Science & Technology.
5. Batterjee, A., (2008). The total giftedness development model at Dar al Thikr School for Boys in Jeddah. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. London: American University of London.
6. Bloom, B. S., (Eds.), (1985). Developing talent in young people. In G., Davis & S., Rimm (Ed.), Education of the Gifted and Talented (pp. 47–48). Pearson Education, Inc.
7. Burns, D. E., (1987). The effects of group training activities on students’ creative productivity. In J., Renzulli & S., Reis (1994). Research related to the schoolwide enrichment triad model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(1), 7–20.
8. Clark, B., (1986). The integrative education model. In J. S., Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 59–91). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
9. th Ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
10. Clark, G. A., & Zimmerman, E., (1984a). Educating artistically talented students. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
11. Clark, G. A., & Zimmerman, E., (1984b). Toward a new conception of talent in the visual arts. Roeper Review, 6(4), 214–215.
12. Clark, G. A., & Zimmerman, E., (1987). Resources for educating artistically talented students. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
13. Clasen, R. E., & Clasen, D. R., (1987). Gifted and talented students: A step-by step approach to programming. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
14. nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
15. Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. A., (2003). Handbook of gifted education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Cox, J., (1987). The Richardson study: Dissemination and implementation. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Department of Education.
17. Davis, G., & Rimm, S., (2004). Education of the gifted and talented. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
18. Delisle, J. R., (1981). The revolving door identification and programming model: Correlates of creative production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
19. Feldhusen, J. F., Proctor, Th., & Black, K., (2002). Guidelines for grade advancement of precocious children. Roeper Review, 24(3), 196.
20. Feldhusen, J. F., & Hoover, S. M., (1986). A conception of giftedness: Intelligence, self-concept and motivation. Roeper Review, 8(3), 140–143.
21. Gallagher, J. J., (1985). Teaching the gifted child (3rd Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyen & Bacon.
22. Gardner, H., (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
23. Gardner, H., (1993). Multiple intelligences the theory in practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
24. st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.
25. Gubbins, E. J., (1982). Revolving door identification model: Characteristics of talent pool students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
26. Heal, M. M., (1989) Student’s perceptions of labeling the gifted: A comparative case study analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
27. Jacobs, J., (1971). Effectiveness of teacher and parent identification of gifted children as a function of school level. Psychology in the Schools, 8, 140–142.
28. nd Ed.). Amman: Dar Alfikr.
29. Kaplan, S. N., (Ed.) (1979). In service training manual: Activities for developing curriculum for the gifted / talented. Venture CA: Office of the Superintendent of Public Schools. In L. J., Coleman & T. L., Cross (2005). Being gifted in school. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc.
30. Kaplan, S. N., (1980). Curricular and programmatic concerns. In L. J., Coleman & T. L., Cross (2005). Being gifted in school. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, Inc.
31. Khaleefa, O., (2004). Al Simbir Project: Gifted children identification methods, evaluation of the gifted and the Sudanese experience. Paper presented to the discussion group on methods of educating & nurturing the gifted, State Ministry of Education in collaboration with the Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research. Khartoum.
32. Khaleefa, O., (2008). Children prodigies and gifted in the Arab world. Amman: Debono for Printing, Publishing, and Distribution.
33. Khaleefa, O., Taha, Z, & Bakheet, S., (2007). Strategies for the identification of the gifted in Al Simbir project in Sudan. Arab Magazine for Special Education, 10, 147–167.
34. nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
35. Martinson, R. A., (n.d.). The identification of the gifted and talented. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
36. Newman, J. L., (1991). The effects of the talent unlimited model on students’ creative productivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
37. Olenchak, F. R., (1991). Assessing program effects for gifted/learning disabled students. In R., Swassing & A., Robinson (Eds.). NAGC 1991 Research Briefs. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
38. Olenchak, F. R., & Renzulli, J., (1989). The effectiveness of the Schoolwide enrichment model on selected aspects of elementary school change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 44–57.
39. Paris, S. G., Lawton, T. A., Turner, J. C., & Roth, J. L., (1991). A developmental perspective on standardized achievement testing. Educational Researcher, 20(5), pp. 12–20.
40. Purcell, J. H., & Renzulli, J. S., (1998). Total talent portfolio. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
41. Reis, S. M., (1981). An analysis of the productivity of gifted students participating in programs using the revolving door identification model. In J. S., Renzulli & S. M., Reis (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
42. Reis, S. M., & Purcell, J. H., (1993). An analysis of content elimination and strategies used by elementary classroom teachers in the curriculum compacting process. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 147–170.
43. Reis, S. M., Burns, D. E., & Renzulli, J. S., (1992). Curriculum compacting. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
44. Renzulli, J., (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing definable programs for the gifted and talented. In J., Renzulli (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
45. Renzulli, J., (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. In J., Renzulli (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
46. rd ed.). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Teaching the Talented Program.
47. Renzulli, J., (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
48. Renzulli, J., & Reis, S., (1985a). The enrichment triad / revolving door model: a schoolwide plan for the development of creative productivity. In J., Renzulli (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
49. Renzulli, J., & Reis, S., (1985b). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
50. Renzulli, J., & Reis, S., (1986). The enrichment triad/revolving door model: A schoolwide plan for the development of creative productivity. In J., Renzulli (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
51. Renzulli, J., & Reis, S., (1994). Research related to the schoolwide enrichment model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 2–14.
52. Renzulli, J., & Reis, S., (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
53. Renzulli, J., & Smith L. H., (1977). The management plan for individual and small group investigations of real problems. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
54. Renzulli, J., Reis, S. M., & Smith L. H., (1981). The revolving door identification model. In J., Renzulli (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
55. Renzulli, J., Smith, L., & Reis, S., (1982). Curriculum compacting: An essential strategy for working with gifted students. The Elementary School Journal, 82, 185–194.
56. Roberts, J., & Inman, T., (2007). Differentiating instruction: Best practice for the classroom. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, Inc.
57. Sadiq, A., Alboni, A., Bisharah, G., AboHatab, F., Rabie, M., Bin Fatimah, M., & Alhamdani, M., (1996). Guideline for the identification of the gifted in basic education. Tunis: Arab Organization for Culture & Sciences.
58. Shakroun, G., (2008). Identifying the behavior of talented and gifted children from different cultures according to an ethno-cognitive approach of their drawing in the pre-school period. Arab Journal of Special Education, 13, 135–174.
59. Skaught, B. J., (1987). The social acceptability of talent pool students in an elementary school using the schoolwide enrichment model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
60. Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P., (1986). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically. In R. J., Sternberg & J. E., Davidson (Eds.). Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 361–387). New York: Cambridge University Press.
61. Starko, A. J., (1986). The effects of the revolving door identification model on creative productivity and selfefficacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
62. Sternberg, R. J., (1986). Identifying the gifted through IQ: Why a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing. Roeper Review, 8(3), 143–150.
63. Sternberg, R. J., (1988). The triarchic mind. In N., Colangelo & G. A., Davis (2003). Handbook of gifted education.Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
64. Sternberg, R. J., (2003). Giftedness according to the theory of successful intelligence. In N., Colangelo & G. A., Davis (2003). Handbook of gifted education. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
65. nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
66. Tellis, W., (1997). Application of a case study methodology. The Qualitative Report, [On-line serial], 3(3). Available: (http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-3/tellis2.html).
67. Torrance, E. P., (1966). Gifted children in the classroom. In G., Davis & S., Rimm (2004). Education of the gifted and talented. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
68. Torrance, E. P., (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J., Sternberg (Ed). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives, (pp 72–89). Cambridge, U K: Cambridge University Press.
69. Treffinger, D. F., & Renzulli, J. S., (1986). Giftedness as potential for creative productivity: Transcending IQ scores. Roeper Review, 8(3), pp. 150–163.
70. Van Tassel-Baska, Joyce, (2005). Acceleration strategies for teaching gifted learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, Inc.
71. Van Tassel-Baska, Joyce, & Brown, E. F., (2007). Towards best practice: An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 4, 342–358.
72. Walker, S., (2002). The survival guide for parents of gifted kids. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
73. rd ed.) Applied Social Research Methods Series Vol. 5. Thousand Oaks: CA. Sage Publications.