Studies concerning the accessibility of different allomorphic forms of cellulose

Cellulose

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 55-68

  Ciolacu, Diana ^a   Pitol Filho, Luizildo ^b   Ciolacu, Florin ^c  

^a PETRU PONI INSTITUTE OF MACROMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY   (Romania)

^b Faculty of Engineering   (Brazil)

^c GHEORGHE ASACHI TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF IASI   (Romania)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Cellulose allomorphs; Flory Huggins interaction parameters; Mass transfer coefficient; Water vapor regain

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; AMORPHOUS REGIONS; CELLULOSE II; CELLULOSIC MATERIAL; CRYSTAL SURFACES; CRYSTALLINE FORM; CRYSTALLINITIES; CRYSTALLINITY INDEX; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FLORY-HUGGINS INTERACTION PARAMETER; MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURES; SUPRAMOLECULAR ARCHITECTURES; THERMODYNAMIC PARAMETER; WATER VAPOR SORPTION;

MASS TRANSFER; RATING; SORPTION; WATER VAPOR;

CELLULOSE;

EID: 84855502857     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-011-9620-1     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Alsoy S, Duda JL (1999) Modeling of multicomponent drying of polymeric films. AIChE J 45: 869-905.
2. Barton AFM (1991) CRC Handbook of solubility parameters and other cohesion parameters, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
3. Bessadok A, Langevin D, Gouanvé F, Chappey C, Marais S (2009) Study of water sorption on modified Agave fibres. Carbohyd Polym 76: 74-85.
4. Cabradilla KE, Zeronian SH (1978) Effect of changes in supramolecular structure on the thermal properties and pyrolysis of cellulose. In: Rowell RM, Young RA (eds) Modified cellulosics. Academic Press Inc, New York, pp 321-340.
5. Ciolacu D (2005) Correlations between the polymorphism of cellulose and its chemical and structural accessibility. PhD thesis, "Gh. Asachi" Technical University.
6. Ciolacu D (2007) On the supramolecular structure of cellulose allomorphs after enzymatic degradation. J Optoelectron Adv Mater 9(4): 1033-1037.
7. Ciolacu D, Popa VI (2003) Studiu privind dizolvarea celulozei in solutii de NaOH prin inghetare la temperaturi scazute. Celuloza si Hartie 52(1): 35-42.
8. Ciolacu D, Popa VI (2005) Structural changes of cellulose determined by dissolution in aqueous alkali solution. Cell Chem Technol 39(3-4): 179-188.
9. Ciolacu D, Popa VI (2006) On the thermal degradation of cellulose allomorphs. Cell Chem Technol 40(6): 445-449.
10. Ciolacu D, Popa VI (2007) The correlation between the reactivity and the supramolecular structure of allomorphs of cellulose. Rev Roum Chim 52(4): 361-366.
11. Ciolacu D, Popa VI, Ciovica S (2002) Factors governing dissolution of cellulose in aqueous NaOH. In: Proceedings of the seventh European workshop on lignocellulosics and pulp, August 26-29, Turku/Åbo, Finland, pp 153-156.
12. Ciolacu D, Popa VI, Ritter H (2006) Cellulose derivatives with adamantoyl groups. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 105-112.
13. Ciolacu D, Ciolacu F, Dumitriu R, Vasile C, Popa VI (2007) Kinetics aspects in the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose allomorphs. Cell Chem Technol 41(1): 37-42.
14. Ciolacu D, Ciolacu F, Popa VI (2008) Supramolecular structure-a key parameter for cellulose biodegradation. Macromol Symp 272(1): 136-142.
15. Cuculo JA, Aminuddin N, Frey MW (2000) Solvent spun cellulose fibers. In: Salem DR (ed) Structure formation in polymeric fibers. Hanser Gardner Publications Inc, Hanser, pp 296-328.
16. Da Silva Perez D, Heiningen ARP (2002) Determination of cellulose degree of polymerization in chemical pulps by viscosimetry. In: Seventh European workshop on Lignocellulosics and Pulp, Turku, pp 393-396.
17. Fried JR (1995) Polymer science and technology. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
18. Gibbons GC (1953) Moisture regain of methylcellulose and cellulose acetate. J Text Inst Trans 44: 201-208.
19. Grethlein HE (1985) The effect of pore size distribution on the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose substrates. Bio/Technol 3: 155-160.
20. Hong J, Ye X, Zhang Y-HP (2007) Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a nonhydrolytic fusion protein containing CBM and GFP with its applications. Langmuir 23(25): 12535-12540.
21. Horii F (2000) Structure of cellulose: recent developments in its characterization. In: David NS, Shiraishi HN (eds) Wood and Cellulosic Chemistry, Second edition. Taylor & Francis Inc, pp 83-108.
22. Ioelovich M (2009) Accessibility and crystallinity of cellulose. BioResources 4(3): 1168-1170.
23. Isogai A (1994) Allomorphs of cellulose and other polysaccharides. In: Gilbert RG (ed) Cellulosic polymers, blends and composites. Hanser Gardner Publications Inc, Hanser, pp 1-24.
24. 2-amine solvent systems. J Polym Sci Pol Chem 29: 113-119.
25. Jeffries R, Roberts TG, Robinson RN (1968) Accessibility and reaction sites in cotton. Text Res J 38: 234-244.
26. Kim N-H, Imai T, Wada M, Sugiyama J (2006) Molecular directionality in cellulose polymorphs. Biomacromolecules 7: 274-280.
27. Klemm D, Philipp B, Heinze T, Heinze U, Wagenknecht W (1998) General considerations on structure and reactivity of cellulose. In: Comprehensive cellulose chemistry, vol 1. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 9-29.
28. Kondo T (2005) Hydrogen bonds in cellulose and cellulose derivatives. In: Dumitriu S (ed) Polysaccharides: Structural diversity and functional versatility. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 69-98.
29. Kondo T, Togawa E, Brown MR Jr (2001) "Nematic Ordered Cellulose": a concept of glucan chain association. Biomacromolecules 2: 1324-1330.
30. Krässig HA (1993a) The fiber structure. In: Huglin MB (ed) Cellulose: structure, accessibility and reactivity, Polymer Monographs, vol 11, chapter 3. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 6-42.
31. Krässig HA (1993b) Methods of fiber structure characterization. In: Huglin MB (ed) Cellulose: structure, accessibility and reactivity, Polymer Monographs, vol 11, chapter 3. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 113-125.
32. Krässig HA (1993c) Effect of structure and morphology on accessibility and reactivity. In: Huglin MB (ed) Cellulose: structure, accessibility and reactivity, Polymer Monographs, vol 11, chapter 5. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 167-325.
33. Langan P, Nishiyama Y, Chanzy H (2001) The X-ray structure of mercerized cellulose II at 1 Ǻ resolution. Biomacromolecules 2: 410-416.
34. Langan P, Sukumar N, Nishiyama Y, Chanzy H (2005) Synchrotron X-ray structures of cellulose I-β and regenerated cellulose II at ambient temperature and 100 K. Cellulose 12(6): 551-562.
35. Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Ibeta from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124: 9074-9082.
36. α from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 125(47): 14300-14306.
37. Nishiyama Y, Johnson GP, French AD, Forsyth VT, Langan P (2008) Neutron crystallography, molecular dynamics, and quantum mechanics studies of the nature of hydrogen bonding in cellulose I-β. Biomacromolecules 9(11): 3133-3140.
38. Olaru N, Ciolacu D, Olaru L (2007) On the heterogeneous acetylation of cellulose allomorphs. J Optoelectron Adv M 9(12): 3917-3920.
39. O'Sullivan AC (1997) Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 4: 173-207.
40. ®) fibers caused by NaOH treatment. Cellulose 16(1): 37-52.
41. Park S, Johnson D, Ishizawa C, Parilla P, Davis M (2009) Measuring the crystallinity index of cellulose by solid state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance. Cellulose 16(4): 641-647.
42. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK (2010) Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulose performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3: 1-10.
43. Rollin JA, Zhu Z, Sathitsuksanoh N, Zhang Y-HP (2011) Increasing cellulose accessibility is more important than removing lignin: a comparison of cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation and soaking in aqueous ammonia. Biotechnol Bioeng 108(1): 22-30.
44. Sathitsuksanoh N, Zhu Z, Wi S, Zhang Y-HP (2011) Cellulose solvent-based biomass pretreatment breaks highly ordered hydrogen bonds in cellulose fibers of switchgrass. Biotechnol Bioeng 108(3): 521-529.
45. Seader JD, Henley EJ (2006) Separation process principles. Wiley, New York.
46. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE Jr, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer. Textile Res J 29: 786-794.
47. Spange S, Fischer K, Prause S, Heinze T (2003) Empirical polarity parameters of celluloses and related materials. Cellulose 10: 201-212.
48. Standard DIN 53 802, 1 (1979) Prüfung von Textilien: Angleichen der Proben an das Normalklima.
49. Standard ISO/FDIS 5351 (2009) Determination of limiting viscosity number in cupriethylenediamine (CED) solution.
50. Tappi Test Method (2008) Determination of equilibrium moisture in pulp, paper and paperboard for chemical analysis, T550 om-03.
51. Thygesen A, Oddershede J, Lilholt H, Thomsen AB, Stahl K (2005) On the determination of crystallinity and cellulose content in plant fibres. Cellulose 12(6): 563-576.
52. I crystal structure and hydrogen bonding by synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. Macromolecules 37(23): 8548-8555.
53. Wadsworth LC, Cuculo JA (1978) Determination of accessibility and crystallinity of cellulose. In: Rowell RM, Young RA (eds) Modified cellulosics. Academic Press Inc, New York, pp 117-196.
54. Zhang Y-HP, Lynd LR (2006) A functionally-based model for hydrolysis of cellulose by fungal cellulase. Biotechnol Bioeng 94(5): 888-898.
55. Zugenmaier P (2001) Conformation and packing of various crystalline cellulose fibers. Prog Polym Sci 26: 1341-1417.
56. Zugenmaier P (2008) Cellulose. In: Wimmer R (ed) Crystalline cellulose and derivatives: characterization and structures. Springer series in wood science. Springer, Berlin, pp 101-174.