Managing resource interaction as a means to cope with technological change

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 188-195

  Chou, Hsin Hui ^a   Zolkiewski, Judy ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Business relationships; Interaction; Resources; Technological change

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855502404     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.021     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Afuah A. How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change?. Strateg Manage J 2000, 21(3):387-404.
2. Alajoutsijärvi K., Möller K., Rosenbröijer C.-J. Relevance of focal nets in understanding the dynamics of business relationships. J of Bus-to-Bus Mark 1999, 6(3):3-35.
3. Anderson H., Havila V., Andersen P., Halinen A. Position and role-conceptualizing dynamics in business networks. Scand J Manage 1998, 14(3):167-186.
4. Anderson J.C., Håkansson H., Johanson J. Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. J of Mark 1994, 58(4):1-15.
5. Araujo L., Harrison D. Path dependence, agency and technological evolution. Technol Anal & Strat Manage 2002, 14(1):5-19.
6. Arthur W.B. Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy 1994, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
7. Brito C.M. Issue-based nets: a methodological approach to the sampling issue in industrial networks research. Qual Mark Res: An Int J 1999, 2(2):92-102.
8. Cooper R.G. Identifying industrial new product success: Project NewProd. Indus Mark Manage 1979, 8(2):124-135.
9. Danneels E. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strateg Manage J 2002, 23:1095-1121.
10. Danneels E. Disruptive technology reconsidered: a critique and research agenda. J of Prod Innov Manage 2004, 21(4):246-258.
11. Dubois A., Gadde L.-E. Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. J of Bus Res 2002, 55:553-560.
12. Ford D., Saren M. Managing and marketing technology 2001, Thomson Learning, London. 2nd ed.
13. Gadde L.-E., Håkansson H. Supply Network Strategies 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
14. Gadde L.-E., Håkansson H. Business relationships and resource combining. The IMP J 2008, 2(1):31-45.
15. Håkansson H., Ford D., Gadde L.-E., Snehota I., Waluszewski A. Business in Networks 2009, John Wiley, Chichester.
16. Håkansson H., Lundgren A. Paths in time and space - path dependence in industrial networks. Evolutionary economics and path dependence 1997, 119-137. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. L. Magnusson, J. Ottosson (Eds.).
17. Developing relationships in business networks 1995, Routledge, London. H. Håkansson, I. Snehota (Eds.).
18. Håkansson H., Waluszewski A. Managing technological development: IKEA, the environment and technology 2002, Routledge, New York.
19. Håkansson H., Waluszewski A. Path dependence: restricting or facilitating technical development?. J of Bus Res 2002, 55:561-570.
20. Halinen A., Törnroos J.-Å. Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks. J of Bus Res 2005, 58:1285-1297.
21. Johanson J., Mattsson L.-G. Network positions and strategic action - an analytical framework. Industrial networks: a new view of reality 1992, 205-217. Routledge, London. B. Axelsson, G. Easton (Eds.).
22. Kash D.E., Rycroft R. Emerging patterns of complex technological innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 2002, 69:581-606.
23. Laage-Hellman J. Business networks in Japan: supplier-customer interaction in product development 1997, Routledge, London.
24. Lundgren A. Technological innovation and network evolution 1995, Routledge, London.
25. Möller K., Svahn S. Role of knowledge in value creation in business nets. J of Manage Stud 2006, 43:985-1007.
26. Moore G.A. Crossing the chasm: marketing and selling technology products to mainstream customer 1991, Harper Collins, New York.
27. Mouzas S., Naudé P. Network mobilizer. J of Bus & Indus Mark 2007, 22(1):62-71.
28. Nadler D.A., Tushman M.L. A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organ Dyn 1980, 9(2):35-51.
29. Normann R., Ramirez R. From value chain to value constellation: designing interactive strategy. Harv Bus Rev 1993, 71(4):65-77.
30. Parolini C. The value net: a tool for competitive strategy 1999, John Wiley, Chichester.
31. Penrose E.T. The theory of the growth of the firm 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 3rd ed.
32. Pettigrew A.M. What is a processual analysis?. Scand J Manage 1997, 13(4):337-348.
33. Ritter T. A framework for analyzing interconnectedness of relationships. Ind Mark Manage 2000, 29(4):317-326.
34. Ritter T., Ford D. Interactions between suppliers and customers in business markets. Rethinking marketing: developing a new understanding of markets 2004, 99-116. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. H. Håkansson, D. Harrison, A. Waluszewski (Eds.).
35. Ritter T., Gemünden H.G. Network competence: its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. J of Bus Res 2003, 56:745-755.
36. Sanchez R. Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strateg Manage J 1995, 16(1):135-159.
37. Schurr P.H., Hedaa L., Geersbro J. Interaction episodes as engines of relationship change. J of Bus Res 2008, 61:877-884.
38. Slater S.F., Mohr J.J. Successful development and commercialization of technological innovation: insights based on strategy type. J of Prod Innov Manage 2006, 23(1):26-33.
39. Sood A., Tellis G.J. Technological evolution and radical innovation. J of Mark 2005, 69(3):152-168.
40. Suárez F.F., Utterback J.M. Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strateg Manage J 1995, 16(6):415-430.
41. Tushman M.L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin Sci Q 1986, 31:439-465.
42. Van de Ven A.H., Huber G.P. Longitudinal field research methods for studying processes of organizational change. Organ Sci 1990, 1(3):213-219.
43. Wilkinson I.F., Young L.C. On cooperating: firms, relations and networks. J of Bus Res 2002, 55:123-132.
44. Yin R.K. Case study research: design and methods 2009, Sage, London. 4th ed.