Evaluating dam re-operation for freshwater conservation in the sustainable rivers project

River Research and Applications

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 777-792

  Konrad, C P ^a   Warner, A ^a   Higgins, J V ^a  

^a THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dams; Environmental flows; River conservation

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DAM; ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84855496318     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: 15351467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.1524     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Allan JD. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 257-284.
2. Andersen DC, Shafroth PB. 2010. Beaver dams, ecological thresholds, and controlled floods as a management tool in a desert riverine ecosystem, Bill Williams River, Arizona. Ecohydrology 3: 325-338.
3. Anderson KE, Paul AJ, McCauley E, Jackson LJ, Post JR, Nisbet RM. 2006. Instream flow needs in streams and rivers: the importance of understanding ecological dynamics. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 309-318.
4. Bednarek AT, Hart DD. 2005. Modifying dam operations to restore rivers: ecological responses to Tennessee River dam mitigation. Ecological Applications 15: 997-1008.
5. Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Alexander G, Barnas K, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C, Follstand-Shah J, Galat D, Gloss S, Goodwin P, Hart D, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Katz S, Kondolf GM, Lake PS, Lave R, Meyer JL, O'Donnel TK, Pagano L, Powell B, Sudduth E. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308: 636-637.
6. Bunn SE, Arthington AH. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30: 492-507.
7. Carpenter SR. 1989. Replication and treatment strength in whole-lake experiments. Ecology 70: 453-463.
8. Carpenter SR, Frost TM, Heisey D, Kratz TK. 1989. Randomized intervention analysis and the interpretation of whole-ecosystem experiments. Ecology 70: 1142-1152.
9. Clausen B, Biggs BJF. 1997. Relationships between benthic biota and hydrologic indices in New Zealand streams. Freshwater Biology 38: 327-342.
10. Connor EJ, Pflug DE. 2004. Changes in the distribution and density of pink, chum, and Chinook salmon spawning in the upper Skagit River in response to flow management measures. Journal of North American Fisheries Management 24: 835-852.
11. Dunham JB, Reiman BE. 1999. Metapopulation structure of bull trout: influences of physical, biotic, and geometrical landscape characteristics. Ecological Applications 9: 642-655.
12. Dynesius M, Nilsson C. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of rivers systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266: 753-762.
13. Fagan WF. 2002. Connectivity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in dendritic metapopulations. Ecology 83: 3243-3249.
14. Failing L, Horn G, Higgins P. 2004. Using expert judgment and stakeholder values to evaluate adaptive management options. Ecology and Society 9: 13. Available at
15. Finlayson CM, D'Cruz R, Aladin N, Barker DR, Beltram G, Brouwer J, Davidson N, Duker L, Junk W, Kaplowitz MD, Ketelaars H, Kreuzberg-Mukhina E, de la Lanza Espino G, Leveque C, Lopez A, Milton RG, Mirabzadeh P, Pritchard D, Revenga C, Rivera M, Hussainy AS, Silvius M, Steinkamp M, Aparin V, Bykova E, Calderon JLG, Gorelkin N, Hagemeijer W, Kreuzberg A, Rodriguez EM, Mirabdullaev I, Mumba M, Plotnikov I, Talskykh V, Toryannikova R. 2005. Inland water systems. In Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, vol. 1, Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds). Island Press: Washington, DC; 551-583.
16. Freeman MC, Bowen ZH, Bovee KD, Irwin ER. 2001. Flow and habitat effects on juvenile fish abundance in natural and altered flow regimes. Ecological Applications 11: 179-190.
17. Freeman RE, Stanley EH, Turner MG. 2003. Analysis and conservation implications of landscape change in the Wisconsin River floodplaUSA. Ecological Applications 13: 416-431.
18. Gould W. 2000. Remote sensing of vegetation, plant species richness, and regional biodiversity hotspots. Ecological Applications 10: 1861-1870.
19. Gregory S, Ashkenas L, Nygaard C. 2007. Summary Report of the Environmental Flows Workshop for the Middle Fork and Coast Fork of the Willamette River, Oregon. Oregon State University: Corvallis, Oregon.
20. Hautzinger A. 2007. Bill Williams River, Arizona: restoring natural variability in an arid lands river. Water Resources Impact 9(4): 18-20.
21. Henson SS, Ahearn DS, Dahlgren RA, Van Nieuwenhuyse E, Tate KW, Fleenor WE. 2007. Water quality response to a pulsed-flow event on the Mokelumne River, California. River Research and Applications 23: 185-200.
22. Hickey JT. 2007. Models and software for supporting ecologically sustainable water management. Water Resources Impact 9(4): 10-14.
23. Horwitz RJ. 1978. Temporal variability patterns and the distributional patterns of stream fishes. Ecological Monographs 48: 307-321.
24. Hughes FMR. 1997. Floodplain biogeomorphology. Progress in Physical Geography 21: 501-529.
25. Hurlbert SH. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187-211.
26. Jansson R, Nilsson C, Renofalt B. 2000. Fragmentation of riparian floras in rivers with dams. Ecology 81: 899-903.
27. Karr JR, Allan JD, Benke AC. 2000. River conservation in the United States and Canada. In Global Perspectives on River Conservation: Science, Policy, and Practice, Boon PJ, Davies BR, Petts GE (eds). John Wiley: New York; 3-39.
28. King J, Cambray JA, Impson ND. 1998. Linked effects of dam-released floods and water temperature on spawning of the Clanwilliam yellowfish Barbus capensis. Hydrobiologia 384: 245-265.
29. Kingsolving AD, Bain MB. 1993. Fish assemblage recovery along a riverine disturbance gradient. Ecological Applications 3: 531-544.
30. Konrad CP. 2010. Monitoring and evaluation of environmental flow prescriptions for five demonstration sites of the Sustainable Rivers Project. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1065.
31. Konrad CP, Brasher A, May J. 2008. Assessing streamflow characteristics as limiting factors on benthic invertebrate assemblages in streams across the western United States. Freshwater Biology 53: 1983-1998. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02024.x
32. Layzer JB, Scott EM. 2006. Restoration and colonization of freshwater mussels and fish in a southeastern United States tailwater. River Research and Applications 22: 475-491.
33. Lienesch PW. 2008. Long Term Fish Population Monitoring of the Green River and Its Tributaries in Mammoth Cave National Park. Western Kentucky University: Bowling Green, Kentucky.
34. Ligon FK, Dietrich WE, Trush WJ. 1995. Ecology of large rivers. Bioscience 45: 183-192.
35. Magilligan FJ, Nislow KH, Graber FJ. 2003. A scale-independent assessment of discharge reduction and riparian dis-connectivity flowing flow regulation by dams. Geology 31: 569-572.
36. Mahoney JM, SB Rood 1998. Streamflow requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitment: an integrative model. Wetlands 18: 634-645.
37. Marchetti MP, Moyle PB. 2001. Effects of flow regime on fish assemblages in a regulated California stream. Ecological Applications 11: 530-539.
38. McMurray PD, Schuster GA. 2003. A Continuation of the Bioassessment of the Macroinvertebrates (Excluding Unionidae) of the Green River below Green River Lake Dam with a Comparison of Results with the Initial Bioassessment of 2000. Eastern Kentucky University: Richmond, Kentucky.
39. Moles KR, Layzer JB. 2008. Reproductive ecology of Actinonaias ligamentina (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in a regulated river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27: 212-222.
40. Monk WA, Wood PJ, Hannah DM, Wilson DA, Extence CA, Chadd RP. 2006. Flow variability and macroinvertebrate community response within riverine systems. River Research and Applications 22: 595-615.
41. Nilsson C, Svedmark M. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of changing water regimes: riparian plant communities. Environmental Management 30: 468-480.
42. Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C. 2005. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems. Science 308: 405-408.
43. Olden JD, Naiman RJ. 2010. Incorporating thermal regimes into environmental flows assessments: modifying dam operations to restore freshwater ecosystem integrity. Freshwater Biology 55: 86-107. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02179.x
44. Opperman JJ, Galloway GE, Fargione J, Mount JF, Richter BD, Secchi S. 2009. Sustainable floodplains through large-scale reconnection to rivers. Science 326: 1487-1488. DOI: 10.1126/science.1178256
45. Osmundson DB, Ryel RJ, Lamarra VL, Pitlick J. 2002. Flow-sediment-biota relations: implications for river regulation effects on native fish abundance. Ecological Applications 12: 1719-1739.
46. Palmer MA, Filoso S. 2009. Restoration of ecosystem services for environmental markets. Science 325: 575-576. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172976
47. Poff NL, Allan JD. 1995. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrologic variability. Ecology 76: 606-627.
48. Poff NL, Zimmerman JKH. 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform environmental flows science and management. Freshwater Biology 55: 147-170.
49. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JK, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg RE. 1997. The natural flow regime. Bioscience 47: 769-784.
50. Poff NL, Allan JD, Palmer MA, Hart DD, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Rogers KH, Meyer JL, Stanford JA. 2003. River flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 298-306.
51. Poff NL, Olden JD, Vieira NKM, Finn DS, Simmons MP, Kondratieff BC. 2006. Functional trait niches of North American lotic insects: traits-based ecological applications in light of phylogenetic relationships. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25: 730-755.
52. Poff NL, Olden JD, Merritt DM, Pepin DM. 2007. Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 5732-5737. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609812104
53. Richards K, Brasington J, Hughes F. 2002. Geomorphic dynamics of floodplains: ecological implications and a potential modelling strategy. Freshwater Biology 47: 559-579.
54. Richter BD, Warner AT, Meyer JL, Lutz K. 2006. A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. River Research and Applications 22: 297-318.
55. Rood SB, Samuelson GM, Braatne JH, Gourley CR, Hughes FMR, Mahoney JM. 2005. Managing river flows to restore floodplain forests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3: 193-201.
56. Rubin DM, Topping DJ, Schmidt JC, Hazel J, Kaplinski M, Melis TS. 2002. Recent sediment studies refute Glen Canyon Dam hypothesis. EOS. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 83: 277-278.
57. Schmidt JC, Andrews ED, Wegner DL, Patten DT, Marzolf GR, Moody TO. 1999. Origins of the 1996 controlled flood in Grand Canyon. In The Controlled Flood in Grand Canyon, Webb RH, Schmidt JC, Marzolf GR, Valdez RA (eds). American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC; 23-36.
58. Shafroth P, Beauchamp V (eds). 2006. Defining ecosystem flow requirements for the Bill Williams River, Arizona. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1314.
59. Shafroth PB, Auble GT, Stromberg JC, Patten DT. 1998. Establishment of woody riparian vegetation in relation to annual patterns of streamflow, Bill Williams River, Arizona. Wetlands 18: 577-590.
60. Shafroth PB, Stromberg JC, Patten DT. 2002. Riparian vegetation response to altered disturbance and stress regimes. Ecological Applications 12: 107-123.
61. Shafroth PB, Wilcox AC, Lytle DA, Hickey JT, Andersen DC, Beauchamp VB, Hautzinger A, McMullen LE, Warner A. 2010. Ecosystem effects of environmental flows: modeling and experimental floods in a dryland river. Freshwater Biology 55: 68-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02271.x
62. Sheldon AL. 1988. Conservation of stream fishes: patterns of diversity, rarity, and risk. Conservation Biology 2: 149-156.
63. Souchon Y, Sabaton C, Deibel R, Rieser D, Kershner J, Gard M, Katopodis C, Leonard P, Poff NL, Miller WJ, Lamb BL. 2008. Detecting biological responses to flow management: missed opportunities; future directions. River Research and Applications 24: 506-518.
64. Summers RB. 2004. Dam Management Strategies and Their Impacts on Lotic Macroinvertebrate Secondary Production in the Green River, Kentucky. Campbellsville University: Campbellsville, Kentucky.
65. Thomas MR, Burr BM, Stewart JG, Henry DB. 2004. Fishes of the Green River Bioreserve, Kentucky: Faunal Composition, Community Structure, and Historical Overview. Campbellsville University: Campbellsville, Kentucky.
66. Thompson K. 2005. Green River Basin Reservoir Simulations. US Army Corps of Engineers, San Francisco District: San Francisco, California.
67. Torgersen CE, Price DM, Li HW, McIntosh BA. 1999. Multiscale thermal refugia and stream habitat associations of chinook salmon in northeastern Oregon. Ecological Applications 9: 301-319.
68. Townsend CR, Doledec S, Scarsbrook MR. 1997. Species traits in relation to temporal and spatial heterogeneity in streams: a test of habitat template theory. Freshwater Biology 37: 367-387.
69. Vaughn CC, Taylor CM. 1999. Impoundments and the decline of freshwater mussels: a case study of an extinction gradient. Conservation Biology 13: 912-920.
70. Ward JV, Stanford JA. 1995. Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 11: 105-119.
71. Ward JV, Tockner K. 2001. Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology. Freshwater Biology 46: 807-819.
72. Ward JV, Tockner K, Arscott DB, Claret C. 2002. Riverine landscape diversity. Freshwater Biology 47: 517-539.
73. Webb JA, Stewardson MJ, Koster WM. 2009. Detecting ecological responses to flow variation using Bayesian hierarchical models. Freshwater Biology 55: 108-126.
74. Wiele SM, Hart RJ, Darling HL, Hautzinger AB. 2009. Sediment transport in the Bill Williams River and turbidity in Lake Havasu during and following two high releases from Alamo Dam, Arizona, in 2005 and 2006. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5195. Available at
75. Wilcox AC, Shafroth PB, McDonald RR, Kinzel PJ, Nelson JM. 2008. Interactions among river flow, geomorphic processes, and riparian vegetation: implications for quantifying ecosystem flow requirements. Abstracts of the Colorado River Basin Science and Resource Management Symposium, 18-20 November. US Geological Survey: Flagstaff, Arizona; 96-97.
76. Williams GP, Wolman MG. 1984. Downstream effects of dams on alluvial rivers. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1286.
77. Wright SA, Schmidt JC, Melis TS, Topping DJ, Rubin DM. 2008. Is there enough sand? Evaluating the fate of Grand Canyon sandbars. GSA Today 18: 4-10.
78. Wrona A, Wear D, Ward J, Sharitz R, Rosenzweig J, Richardson JP, Peterson D, Leach S, Lee L, Jackson CR, Gordon J, Freeman M, Flite O, Eidson G, Davis M, Batzer D. 2007. Restoring ecological flows to the lower Savannah River: a collaborative scientific approach to adaptive management. Proceedings of the 2007 Georgia Water Resources Conference, 27-29 March 2007. University of Georgia: Athens, Georgia.