Full-body movement as material for interaction design

Digital Creativity

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 247-262

  Hansen, Lise Amy ^a  

^a OSLO SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN   (Norway)

Author keywords

choreography; communication; design material; interaction design

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855491762     PISSN: 14626268     EISSN: 17443806     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14626268.2011.622284     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alexander, C. 1979. The timeless way of building, New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Ashbrook, D. and Starner, T. 2010. "Magic: a motion gesture design tool". In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems 10-15 April 2010 Atlanta, Georgia. New York: ACM, 2159-2168
3. Bal, M. 2002. Travelling concepts in the humanities: a rough guide, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
4. Bastien, M. 2007. "Notation-in-progress". In Capturing intention, Edited by: deLahunta, S. 48-55. Amsterdam: Emio Greco {pipe} PC and Amsterdam School of the Arts.
5. Bevilacqua, F. 2010. "Continuous realtime gesture following and recognition". In Gesture in embodied communication and human-computer interaction, Edited by: Kopp, S. and Wachsmuth, I. Vol. 5934, 73-84. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin.
6. Bevilaqua, F. 2007. "Momentary notes on capturing gestures". In Capturing intention, Edited by: deLahunta, S. 26-31. Amsterdam: Emio Greco{pipe}PC and Amsterdam School of the Arts.
7. Birdwhistell, R. L. 1971. Kinesics and context: essays on body-motion communication, London: Allan Lane, Penguin Press.
8. Bleeker, M. 2010. "What if this were an archive?". In Notation, Edited by: deLahunta, S. 3-5. Amsterdam: ARTI, Artistic Research, Theory and Innovation.
9. Bolter, J. D. and Grusin, R. 1999. Remediation: understanding new media, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Broadhurst, S. 2007. Digital practices: aesthetic and neuroesthetic approaches to performance and technology, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Buxton, B. 2007. Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12. Cabral, D. and Correia, N. 2009. "Pen-based video annotations: a proposal and a prototype for Tablet PCs". In Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 international conference on human-computer interaction: part II 24-28 August 2009, Uppsala. Springer-Verlag, 17-20
13. Camurri, A., Mazzarino, B. and Volpe, G. 2004. Expressive interfaces. Cognition, Technology & Work, 6(1): 15-22.
14. Cornoldi, C. 1996. Stretching the imagination: representation and transformation in mental imagery, New York: Oxford University Press.
15. deLahunta, S. and Shaw, N. Z. 2008. Choreographic resources agents, archives, scores and installations. Performance Research, 13(1): 131-133.
16. deLhunta, S. 2007. "The moment to question. Double Skin/Double Mind". In Capturing intention, Edited by: deLahunta, S. 20-21. Amsterdam: Emio Greco {pipe} PC and Amsterdam School of the Arts.
17. Dourish, P. 2001. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Eikenes, J. O. 2010. Navimation: a sociocultural exploration of kinetic interface design, Oslo: Oslo School of Architecture and Design.
19. eyesweb [online]. Available from: http://www.infomus.org/Eywindex.html [Accessed 30 August 2010].
20. Fogtmann, M. H., Fritsch, J. and Kortbek, K. J. Kinesthetic interaction: revealing the bodily potential in interaction design. Proceedings of the 20th Australasian conference on computer-human interaction: designing for habitus and habitat. December8-122008, Cairns. pp.89-96. New York: ACM.
21. Forsythe, W. 2008. "Choreographic objects". In Suspense, Edited by: Markus Weisbeck for Ursula Bickle Stiftung. 5-7. Zürich: JRP {pipe} Ringier Kunstverlag.
22. Foster, S. L. 1995. "An introduction to moving bodies". In Choreographing history, Edited by: Foster, S.L. 3-21. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
23. Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J. and Benford, S. 2003. "Ambiguity as a resource for design". In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems 5-12 April 2003 Fort Lauderdale, Florida. New York: ACM, 233-240
24. gesture follower [online]. Available from: http://ftm.ircam.fr/index.php/Gesture_Follower [Accessed 30 August 2010].
25. Goldschmidt, G. 1994. On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture. Design Studies, 15(2): 158-174.
26. Hall, E. T. 1966. The hidden dimension, New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday.
27. Hallnäs, L., Melin, L. and Redström, J. 2002. "Textile displays: using textiles to investigate computational technology as design material". In Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on human-computer interaction 19-23 October 2003, Aarhus. New York: ACM, 157-166
28. Hansen, M. B.N. 2004. New philosophy for new media, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Hayles, N. K. 1999. How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30. Hollan, J. and Stornetta, S. 1992. "Beyond being there". In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems 3-7 May 1992, Monterey, California. New York; ACM, 119-125
31. Hoogenboom, M. 2007. "Artistic research as an expanded kind of choreography using the example of Emio Greco {pipe} PC". In Knowledge in motion: perspectives of artistic research and scientific research in dance, Edited by: Gehm, S., Huseman, P. and Wilcke, K. v. Vol. 9, 81-90. Bielefeld: transcript.
32. Hummels, C., Overbeeke, K. C. and Klooster, S. 2007. Move to get moved: a search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8): 677-690.
33. ICKamsterdam [online]. Available from: http://www.ickamsterdam.com/index.php?art1/4507&page1/42 [Accessed 30 August 2010].
34. Inside Movement Knowledge [online]. Available from: http://insidemovementknowledge.net/ [Accessed 30 August 2010].
35. Isadora [online]. Available from: http://www.troikatronix.com/isadora.html [Accessed 30 August 2010].
36. Jensenius, A. R. 2007. Action - sound: developing methods and tools to study music-related body movement Unpublished thesis, University of Oslo
37. Kickasola, J. 2006. Contemporary media and the evolving notion of immediacy. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 23(4): 299-310.
38. Knapp, M. L. and Hall, J. A. 2006. Nonverbal communication in human interaction, Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
39. Kozel, S. 2007. Closer: performance, technologies, phenomenology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication, London: Routledge.
41. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. 2001. Multimodal discourse: the modes and media of contemporary communication, London: Arnold.
42. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. 2006. Reading images: the grammar of visual design, London: Routledge.
43. Lifeforms [online]. Available from: http://www.merce.org/about/danceforms.php [Accessed 30 August 2010].
44. Loke, L. 2007. Understanding movement for interaction design: frameworks and approaches. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8): 691-701.
45. Löwgren, J. 2007. Inspirational patterns for embodied interaction. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 20(3): 165-177.
46. Löwgren, J. and Stolterman, E. 2004. Thoughtful interaction design: a design perspective on information technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Manning, E. 2009. Relationscapes: movement, art, philosophy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Moeslund, T. B., Hilton, A. and Krüger, V. 2006. A survey of advances in vision-based human motion capture and analysis. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 104(2): 90-126.
49. Morrison, A. 2009. Disquiet in the plasma. Digital Creativity, 20(1): 3-20.
50. Munster, A. 2006. Materializing new media: embodiment in information aesthetics, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
51. Nöe, A. 2004. Action in perception, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Noland, C. 2009. Agency & embodiment - performing gestures/producing culture, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Penny, S. 2004. "Representation, enaction, and the ethics of stimulation". In First person: new media as story, performance, and game, Edited by: Harrigan, P. and Wardrip-Fruin, N. 73-84. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Pfeifer, R. and Bongard, J. 2007. How the body shapes the way we think: a new view of intelligence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Poggenpohl, S., Chayutsahakij, P. and Jeamsinkul, C. 2004. Language definition and its role in developing a design discourse. Design Studies, 25(6): 579-605.
56. Schechner, R. 2002. Performance studies: an introduction, London: Routledge.
57. Schiller, G. 2006. "Kinaesthetic traces across material forms: stretching the screen's stage". In Performance and technology: practices of virtual embodiment and interactivity, Edited by: Broadhurst, S. 100-111. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
58. Schön, D. A. 1983. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action, Aldershot: Avebury.
59. Sengers, P. and Gaver, B. 2006. "Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation". In Proceedings of the 6th conference on designing interactive systems 26-28 June 2006, University Park, PA. New York: ACM, 99-108
60. Sevaldson, B. 2010. Discussions and movements in design research. FORMakademisk, 3(1)
61. Siobhan Davies RePlay [online]. Available at: http://www.siobhandaviesreplay.com [Accessed 30 August 2010].
62. Shaw, N. Z. 2009. Animating choreography [online]. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHqVJkgFNZY [Accessed 30 August 2010]
63. Shneiderman, B. 1998. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
64. Sigman, J. 2000. How dances signify: Trio A and the myth of ordinary movement. Journal of Philosophical Research, 25: 489-533.
65. Stenning, K. and Oberlander, J. 1995. A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19: 97-140.
66. Suwa, M., Gero, J. S. and Purcell, T. 1999. "Unexpected discoveries and s-inventions of design requirements: a key to creative designs". In Computational models of creative design IV, Edited by: Gero, J. S. and Maher, M. L. 297-320. Sydney: Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney.
67. Suwa, M. 2001. "Seeing into sketches: regrouping parts encourages new interpretations". In Visual and spatial reasoning in design II, Edited by: Gero, J., Tversky, B. and Purcel, T. 207-219. Sydney: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney.
68. Synchronous Objects [online]. Available from: http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/ [Accessed 30 August 2010].
69. Tseng, W., Scrivener, S. and Ball, L. 2002. "The impact of functional knowledge on sketching". In Proceedings of the 4th conference on creativity & cognition 13-16 October 2002, Loughborough. New York: ACM, 57-64
70. vvvv [online]. Available at: http://legacy.vvvv.org/tikiindex.php [Accessed 30 August 2010].
71. Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72. Wachsmuth, I., Lenzen, M. and Knoblich, G. 2008. Embodied communication in humans and machines, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B. and Jackson, D. D. 1967. Pragmatics of human communication: a study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes, New York: Norton.
74. Whatley, S. and Varney, R. 2009. Born digital; dance in the digital age. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 5(1): 51-63.
75. Wildschut, L. and Butterworth, J. 2009. Contemporary choreography: a critical reader, London: Routledge.
76. Wright, P., Blythe, M. and McCarthy, J. 2008. Editorial. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 12(5): 343-346.