A physico-chemical characterisation of new raw materials for microcrystalline cellulose manufacturing

Cellulose

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 219-235

  Virtanen, Tommi ^a   Svedström, Kirsi ^a   Andersson, Seppo ^a   Tervala, Laura ^a   Torkkeli, Mika ^a   Knaapila, Matti ^b   Kotelnikova, Nina ^c   Maunu, Sirkka Liisa ^a   Serimaa, Ritva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c INSTITUTE OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Coniferous needles; Hemp; Microcrystalline cellulose; Rice husks; SAXS; Solid state NMR; WAXS

Indexed keywords

MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; RICE HUSKS; SAXS; SOLID STATE NMR; WAXS;

CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; CRYSTALLITE SIZE; HEMP; LIGHT POLARIZATION; NEEDLES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SCATTERING; X RAY SCATTERING;

CELLULOSE;

CRYSTALLITES; HEMP; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; OPTICAL SCATTERING; POLARIZATION;

EID: 84855478160     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-011-9636-6     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abe K, Yano H (2009) Comparison of the characteristics of cellulose microfibril aggregates of wood, rice straw and potato tuber. Cellulose 16: 1017-1023.
2. Andersson S, Serimaa R, Torkkeli M, Paakkari T, Saranpää P, Pesonen E (2000) Microfibril angle of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] compression wood: comparision of measuring techniques. J Wood Sci 46: 343-349.
3. Andersson S, Serimaa R, Paakkari T, Saranpää P, Pesonen E (2003) The crystallinity of wood and the size of cellulose crystallites in Norway spruce (Picea abies). J Wood Sci 49(6): 531-537.
4. Andersson S, Serimaa R, Väänänen T, Paakkari T, Jämsä S, Viitaniemi P (2005) X-ray scattering studies of thermally modified Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Holzforschung 59: 422-427.
5. Battista J (1975) Microcrystal polymer science. McGraw-Hill, New York.
6. Beckermann G, Pickering K (2008) Engineering and evaluation of hemp fibre reinforced polypropylene composites: fibre treatment and matrix modification. Compos A 39: 979-988.
7. Di Guardo A, Zaccara S, Cerabolini B, Acciarri M, Terzaghi G, Calamari D (2003) Conifer needles as passive biomonitors of the spatial and temporal distribution of DDT from a point source. Chemosphere 52: 789-797.
8. Efremova SV, Korolev YM, Sukharnikov YI (2008) X-ray diffraction characterization of silicon-carbon nanocomposites produced from rice husk and its derivatives. Chem Technol 419: 78-81.
9. Eichhorn S, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich N, Capadona J, Rowan S, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S, Gindl W, Veigel S, Keckes J, Yano H, Abe K, Nogi M, Nakagaito A, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight A, Bismarck A, Berglund L, Peijs T (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45: 1-33. URL: 10. 1007/s10853-009-3874-0.
10. Feigin L, Svergun D (1987) Structure analysis by small angle X-ray and neutron scattering. Plenum Press, New York.
11. Green JW (1963) Methods in carbohydrate chemistry, iiird edn. Academic Press, New York.
12. Haworth DT, Zetlmeisl MJ (1968) Thin-layer chromatography of some inorganic complexes using microcrystalline cellulose as the separation medium. Sep Sci Technol 3(2): 145-150.
13. Jakob H, Fengel D, Tschegg S, Fratzl P (1995) The elementary cellulose fibril in Picea abies: comparison of transmission electron microscopy, small-angle X-ray scattering and wide-angle X-ray scattering results. Macromolecules 28: 8782-8787.
14. Jakob H, Tschegg S, Fratzl P (1996) Hydration dependence of the wood-cell structure in Picea abies: a small-angle scattering study. Macromolecules 29: 8435-8440.
15. Jenkins B, Baxter L, Miles T (1998) Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Process Technol 54(1-3): 17-46.
16. Knaus S, Bauer-Heim B (2003) Synthesis and properties of anionic cellulose ethers: influence of functional groups and molecular weight on flowability of concrete. Carbohydr Polym 53(4): 383-394. doi: 10. 1016/S0144-8617(03)00106-1, URL: http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/B6TFD-48R1WR5-1/2/485a3eecb1216f980075a8f12e66e33c.
17. Kotelnikova N, Fengel D, Kotelnikov V (1994) Electron microscopic visualization of existence of weak bonds in cellulose. In: Prepr. of Kyoto Conference on Cellulose, p 64.
18. Kurschner K, Popik M (1962) Zur analyse von holzern. Holzforschung 16(1): 1-11.
19. Leppänen K, Andersson S, Torkkeli M, Knaapila M, Kotelnikova N, Serimaa R (2009) Structure of cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose from various wood species, cotton and flax studied by X-ray scattering. Cellulose 16(6): 999-1015.
20. Levis SR, Deasy PB (2001) Pharmaceutical applications of size reduced grades of surfactant co-processed microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm 230(1-2): 25-33. doi: 10. 1016/S0378-5173(01)00843-2, URL: http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/B6T7W-44724PW-3/2/0b3b7fa91b51a1734cd7022b64b75a5c.
21. Liitiä T, Maunu SL, Hortling B, Tamminen T, Pekkala O, Varhimo A (2003) Cellulose crystallinity and ordering of hemicelluloses in pine and birch pulps as revealed by solid-state NMR spectroscopic methods. Cellulose 10: 307-316.
22. Liou TH, Chang FW, Lo JJ (1997) Pyrolysis kinetics of acid-leached rice husk. Ind Eng Chem Res 36: 568-573.
23. Lovchikova L, Nikonenko S, Plyuta V, Sergeichik S (1997) Spectral reflection characteristics of spruce needles and leaves of trees in the zones with industrially polluted air. J Appl Spectr 64(6): 804-808.
24. Marshall K, Sixsmith D (1974) Some physical characteristics of microcrystalline cellulose 1. Powders for pharmaceutical use. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1(1): 51-71. doi: 10. 3109/03639047409088168, URL: http://informahealthcare. com/doi/abs/10. 3109/03639047409088168, http://informahealthcare. com/doi/pdf/10. 3109/03639047409088168.
25. Maruska A, Liesiene J, Serys A (1996) Regulation of cellulose based adsorbent granule morphology. J Chromatogr A 746: 147-160.
26. Matsuoka H, Tanaka H, Hashimoto T, Ise N (1987) Elastic scattering from cubic lattice systems with paracrystalline distortion. J Am Phys Soc 36(3): 1754-1765.
27. McTiernan KB, Coûteaux MM, Berg B, Berg MP, de Anta RC, Gallardo A, Kratz W, Piussi P, Remacle J, Santo AVD (2003) Changes in chemical composition of Pinus sylvestris needle litter during decomposition along a European coniferous forest climatic transect. Soil Biol Biochem 35(6): 801-812. doi: 10. 1016/S0038-0717(03)00107-X, URL: http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/B6TC7-4875VVM-1/2/64094926b24f898960012ca57ec3c0ba.
28. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40: 3941-3994. doi: 10. 1039/C0CS00108B, URL: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1039/C0CS00108B.
29. β in wood by carbon-13 nmr spectroscopy. Holzforschung 53(4): 335-340.
30. Obolenskaya AV, Shchegolev VP, Akim GL, Akim E, Kossovich NP, Emel'yanova IZ (1965) Practical works on chemistry of wood and cellulose. Forest Industry, Moscow.
31. O'Donnell A, Dweib M, Wool R (2004) Natural fiber composites with plant oil-based resin. Compos Sci Technol 64: 1135-1145.
32. Okahisa Y, Yoshida A, Miyaguchi S, Yano H (2009) Optically transparent wood-cellulose nanocomposite as a base substrate for flexible organic light-emitting diode displays. Compos Sci Technol 69(11-12): 1958-1961. doi: 10. 1016/j. compscitech. 2009. 04. 017, URL: http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/B6TWT-4W6Y851-3/2/3fd92d80172fa4e74af0601a9d25c46f, experimental techniques and design in composite materials (ETDCM8) with regular papers.
33. Ouajai S, Shanks R (2005) Solvent and enzyme induced recrystallization of mechanically degraded hemp cellulose. Cellulose 13: 31-44.
34. Penttilä PA, Várnai A, Leppänen K, Peura M, Kallonen A, Jääskeläinen P, Lucenius J, Ruokolainen J, Siika-aho M, Viikari L, Serimaa R (2010) Changes in submicrometer structure of enzymatically hydrolyzed microcrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 11(4): 1111-1117. doi: 10. 1021/bm1001119, URL: http://pubs. acs. org/doi/abs/10. 1021/bm1001119, pMID: 20329744, http://pubs. acs. org/doi/pdf/10. 1021/bm1001119.
35. Petropavlovsky G, Kotelnikova N (1985) Phenomenological model of the fine structure of native cellulose based on the study of heterogeneous and homogeneous destruction. Acta Polymerica 36(2): 118-123.
36. Rydholm SA (1965) Pulping processes. Interscience Publishers, New York.
37. Sanguansri P, Augustin MA (2006) Nanoscale materials development-a food industry perspective. Trends Food Sci Technol 17(10): 547-556. doi: 10. 1016/j. tifs. 2006. 04. 010, URL: http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/B6VHY-4K0D7WR-1/2/dee171d8e3796d61a0859e23344ad50f.
38. Siriwardena S, Ismail H, Ishiaku U, Perera M (2002) Mechanical and morphological properties of white rice husk ash filled polypropylene/ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymer thermoplastic elastomer composites. J Appl Polym Sci 85(2): 438-453.
39. Sivonen H, Nuopponen M, Maunu SL, Sundholm F, Vuorinen T (2003) Carbon-thirteen cross-polarization magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance and fourier transform infrared studies of thermally modified wood exposed to brown and soft rot fungi. Appl Spectrosc 57(3): 266-273. URL: http://as. osa. org/abstract. cfm?URI=as-57-3-266.
40. Sutinen S, Kivimäenpää M (2000) Cellular and tissue changes in needles. Forest condition in a changing environment-the Finnish case, vol 65. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
41. Teeäär R, Serimaa R, Paakkari T (1987) Crystallinity of cellulose, as determined by CP/MAS NMR and XRD methods. Polym Bull 17(3): 231-237.
42. Thygesen A, Oddershede J, Lilholt H, Thomsen A, Ståhl K (2005) On the determination of crystallinity and cellulose content in plant fibres. Cellulose 12: 563-576.
43. Watari T, Umaba K, Torikai T, Imaoka Y (1999) Preparation of porous ceramics from rice husk. In: Nippon Seramikkusu Kyokai Nenkai Koen Yokoshu, pp 123-129.
44. Wilke W, Bratrich M (1991) Investigation of the superstructure of polymers during deformation by synchrotron radiation. J Appl Cryst 24: 645-650.
45. Yilmaz S, Zengin M (2004) Monitoring environmental pollution in Erzurum by chemical analysis of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) needles. Environ Int 29: 1041-1047.