Population, professional, and client support for different models of managing addictive behaviors

Substance Use and Misuse

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 296-308

  Koski Jännes, Anja ^a   Hirschovits Gerz, Tanja ^a   Pennonen, Marjo ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Attributions; Clients; Population; Responsibility; Survey; Treatment professionals

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; FINLAND; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORALITY; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL STIGMA; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; FEMALE; FINLAND; GAMBLING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORALS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL STIGMA; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TOBACCO USE DISORDER;

EID: 84855473261     PISSN: 10826084     EISSN: 15322491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2011.629708     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bennett, L. A. (1995). Accountability for alcoholism in American families. Social Science & Medicine, 40, 15-25. (Pubitemid 24353138)
2. Blomqvist, J. (2004). Sweden's "war on drugs" in the light of addicts' experiences. In P. Rosenqvist, J. Blomqvist, A. Koski-Jännes, & L. Ö jesjö, (Eds.), (Addiction and life course (pp. 139-171). Helsinki: NAD Publication.
3. Blomqvist, J. (2009).What is the worst thing you could get hooked on? Popular images on addiction problems in contemporary Sweden. NAT, 26, 373-398.
4. Brickman, P. Rabinovits, V. C., Karuza, J., Coates, D., Cohn, E., & Kidder, L. (1982). Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist, 37, 368-384.
5. Edwards, G. (2010). The trouble with drink: why ideas matter. Addiction, 105, 797-804.
6. Furnham, A., & Lowick, V. (1984). Lay theories of the causes of alcoholism. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 57, 319-332. (Pubitemid 15152334)
7. Furnham, A., & Thompson, L. (1996). Lay theories of heroin addiction. Social Science and Medicine, 43, 29-40. (Pubitemid 26190868)
8. Hatgis, C., Friedman, P. D., & Wiener, M. (2008). Attributions of responsibility for addiction: The effects of gender and type of substance. Substance Use & Misuse, 43, 700-708. (Pubitemid 351507743)
9. Hirschovits-Gerz, T., Holma, K., Koski-J̈annes, A., Raitasalo, K., Blomqvist, J., Cunningham, J. A., et al. (2011). Is there something peculiar about Finnish views on alcohol addiction? A cross-cultural comparison between four Nordic populations. Research on Finnish Society, 4, 41-54.
10. Hirschovits-Gerz, T., & Koski-J̈annes, A. (2010). Suomalaisten k̈asityksiä riippuvuuksista. Sukupuolen, iän sek̈a yhteiskunnallisen todellisuuden vaikutuksia mielikuviin [Finnish views on addictions. The influence of gender, age, and societal reality on notions concerning dependencies]. Sosiologia, 47, 3-23.
11. Holma K., Koski-J̈annes A., Raitasalo K., Blomqvist J., Pervova, I., & Cunningham, J. A. (2011). Perceptions of addictions as societal problems in Canada, Sweden, Finland and St. Petersburg, Russia. European Addiction Research, 17, 106-112.
12. Jones, E. E.,&Nisbet, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. New York: General Learning Press.
13. J̈arvinen, M. (2002). Institutionalised resignation-On the development of the Danish treatment system [English supplement]. Nordisk Alkohol-og narkotikatidsskrift, 19, 5-17.
14. Kleinke, C. L., & Kane, J. C. (1998). Responsibility attributions for clients working with a counselor, clinical psychologist, or psychiatrist on various problems. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 20, 77-88.
15. Klingemann, H., Sobell, L., Barker, J., Blomqvist, J., Cloud, W., Ellinstad, T., et al. (2001). Promoting self-change from problem substance use. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic/London: Croom Helm.
16. Malle, B. F. (2006). The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 895-919. (Pubitemid 44665371)
17. Mäkelä, K. (1980). What can medicine properly taken on? In G. Edwards & M. Grant (Eds.), Alcoholism treatment in transition (pp. 225-233). London: Croom Helm.
18. Morojele, N. K., & Stephenson, G. M. (1992). The Minnesota model in the treatment of addictions: A social psychological assessment of changes in beliefs and attributions. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 2, 25-41.
19. Orcutt, J. D. (1976). Ideological variations in the structure of deviant types: A multivariate comparison of alcoholism and heroin addiction. Social Forces, 55, 419-436.
20. Orford, J. (2001). Excessive appetites: A psychological view of addictions. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
21. Palm, J. (2004). The nature and responsibility for alcohol and drug problems: Views among treatment staff. Addiction Research and Theory, 12, 413-431. (Pubitemid 39524082)
22. Pennonen, M., & Koski-J̈annes, A. (2010). Päihdealan ammattilaisten k̈asityksiä aineriippuvuuksista [Views of substance abuse professionals on various substance dependencies]. Janus, 18, 208-224.
23. Saarelainen, R., Stengård, E., & Vuori-Kemilä, A. (2003). Mielenterveys-ja päihdetyö [Mental health and substance abuse work]. Helsinki: WSOY.
24. Samuelsson, E., Blomqvist, J.,&Cristophs, I. (2009, June 1-5). Addiction and recovery-Conceptions among professionals in the Swedish treatment system. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Alcohol Epidemiology Symposium of the Kettil Bruun Society, Copenhagen.
25. Schomerus, G., Lucht, M., Holzinger, A., Matschinger, H., Carta, M. G., & Angermeyer, M. C. (2011). The stigma of alcohol dependence compared with other mental disorders: A review of population studies. Alcohol & Alcoholism, 46, 105-112.
26. West, R., & Power, D. (1995) Alcoholics' beliefs about responsibility for, and recovery from their condition. Drug and Alcohol Review, 14, 55-62.