The role of coalitions in drug policy. Some theoretical and observational considerations;La importancia de las coaliciones en las políticas sobre drogas. Algunas consideraciones derivadas de la teoría y de la observación

Adicciones

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 183-187

  Uchtenhagen, Ambros ^a  

^a Institut fur Sucht und Gesundheitsforschung Zurich   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Actor network theory; Case study; Coalition building; Societal learning; Urban drug policy

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; COOPERATION; EDITORIAL; HEALTH; HUMAN; PUBLIC HEALTH; SWITZERLAND;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; PUBLIC HEALTH; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; SWITZERLAND; URBAN HEALTH;

EID: 84855424031     PISSN: 02144840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.20882/adicciones.142     Document Type: Editorial

References (19)

1. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an Uncertain World. An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
2. DCD (2005). Democracy, Cities and Drugs project 2005-2007 (www.democitydrug.org).
3. DCDII (2011). Democracy, Cities and Drugs project 2008-2011. (www.democitydrug.org).
4. EU (2008). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on an EU Drugs Action Plan for 2009-2012. COM (2008) 567/4. Brussels 18.9.2008.
5. Freeman, L. (2006). The Development of Social Network Analysis. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
6. Grob, P. (2010). Zürcher "Needle Park" Ein Stück Drogengeschichte und -politik 1968-2008 (The needle-park in Zurich. A lesson in drug history and -policy 1968-2008). Zürich: Chronos.
7. Kübler, D. (1999) Beyond nimbyism. Urban conflict resolution in Swiss drug policies, in U. Khan (ed.), Participation Beyond theBallot Box. European Case Studies in State-Citizen Dialogue (pp. 43-64). London: UCL Press.
8. Kübler, D. (2000). Politique de la drogue dans les villes suisses entre ordre et santé. Analyse des conflits de mise en oeuvre, Paris: L'Harmattan.
9. Kübler, D. (2001). Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework: an application to Swiss Drug Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 8:623-641.
10. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor- Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Law, J. & Hassard J. (eds) (1999). Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. May, C., Mair, F.S., Finch, T., MacFarlane, A., Dowrick, C., Treweek, S., Rapley, T., Ballini, L., et al. (2009). Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory. Implementation Science 4: 29.
12. Prague Declaration (2011). On the principles of effective urban drug policies. Presented and adopted at the Prague Conference on Urban Drug Policies in a Globalised World Sept 2010 (www.drugpolicy.com).
13. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, Free Press.
14. Sabatier, P.A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 5: 98-130.
15. Serduelt, U. (2000). Politiknetzwerke in der städtischen Drogenpolitik von Bern, Chur, St. Gallen und Zürich (Policy networks for urban drug policies in Bern, Chur, St. Gallen and Zurich). PhD Thesis, University of Zurich.
16. Uchtenhagen, A. (2010). Heroin-assisted treatment in Switzerland: a case study in policy change. Addiction 105:29-37
17. Waddell, S. (2005). Societal learning and Change. Sheffield UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
18. Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating Models of Diffusion of Innovations: A Conceptual Framework. Annual Review of Sociology (Annual Reviews) 28: 297-306.
19. WHO (2001) World Health Report 2001. Mental Health: New understanding, new hope. Geneva, World Health Organisation.