Effect of controlled adverse chamber environment exposure on tear functions in silicon hydrogel and hydrogel soft contact lens wearers

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 8811-8817

  Kojima, Takashi ^a   Matsumoto, Yukihiro ^a   Ibrahim, Osama M A ^a   Wakamatsu, Tais Hitomi ^a   Uchino, Miki ^b   Fukagawa, Kazumi ^b   Ogawa, Junko ^c   Dogru, Murat ^a   Negishi, Kazuno ^a   Tsubota, Kazuo ^a  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Ryogoku Eye Clinic   (Japan)

^c KITASATO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NARAFILCON; SILICON; ETAFILCON; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLINKING; CONTROLLED ADVERSE CHAMBER ENVIRONMENT EXPOSURE; DRY EYE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EVAPORATION; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FUNCTION TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMIDITY; HYDROGEL; LACRIMAL FLUID; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OSMOLARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOFT CONTACT LENS; TEAR FILM; TEST STRIP; VISUAL ACUITY; VITAL STAIN; AIR QUALITY CONTROL; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEMPERATURE; WIND;

ADULT; ATMOSPHERE EXPOSURE CHAMBERS; BLINKING; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HUMIDITY; HYDROGEL; MALE; METHACRYLATES; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SILICON; TEARS; TEMPERATURE; VISUAL ACUITY; WIND; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855410930     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6841     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Foulks GN. Prolonging contact lens wear and making contact lens wear safer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:369-373.
2. Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a). Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32:281-286.
3. Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with contact lens-related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1319-1328.
4. Uchino M, Schaumberg DA, Dogru M, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among Japanese visual display terminal users. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1982-1988.
5. Uchino M, Dogru M, Uchino Y, et al. Japan Ministry of Health study on prevalence of dry eye disease among Japanese high school students. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:925-929 e922.
6. Cedarstaff TH, Tomlinson A. A comparative study of tear evaporation rates and water content of soft contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1983;60:167-174.
7. Guillon M, Maissa C. Contact lens wear affects tear film evaporation. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:326-330.
8. Maruyama K, Yokoi N, Takamata A, Kinoshita S. Effect of environmental conditions on tear dynamics in soft contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2563-2568.
9. Nilsson SE, Andersson L. Contact lens wear in dry environments. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1986;64:221-225.
10. Franck C. Eye symptoms and signs in buildings with indoor climate problems ('office eye syndrome'). Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1986;64:306-311.
11. Eng WG, Harada LK, Jagerman LS. The wearing of hydrophilic contact lenses aboard a commercial jet aircraft, I: humidity effects on fit. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1982;53:235-238.
12. Ousler GW 3rd, Anderson RT, Osborn KE. The effect of senofilcon A contact lenses compared to habitual contact lenses on ocular discomfort during exposure to a controlled adverse environment. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:335-341.
13. Shimazaki J. Definition and criteria of dry eye (in Japanese). Atarashii-Ganka. 1995;24:181-184.
14. Goto E, Endo K, Suzuki A, Fujikura Y, Matsumoto Y, Tsubota K. Tear evaporation dynamics in normal subjects and subjects with obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:533-539.
15. Endo K, Suzuki N, Hoshi M, Shioya Y, Kato T, Fujikura Y. The evaluation of epoxy resin coated quartz crystal humidity sensor and the measurement of water evaporation from human surfaces. J Surf Finishing Soc Jpn. 2001;52:708-712.
16. Lemp MA, Bron AJ, Baudouin C, et al. Tear osmolarity in the diagnosis and management of dry eye disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:792-798.
17. Dogru M, Ishida K, Matsumoto Y, et al. Strip meniscometry: a new and simple method of tear meniscus evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1895-1901.
18. Kaido M, Dogru M, Yamada M, et al. Functional visual acuity in Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:917-922.
19. Kaido M, Ishida R, Dogru M, Tamaoki T, Tsubota K. Efficacy of punctum plug treatment in short breakup time dry eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:758-763.
20. Ousler GW, Gomes PJ, Welch D, Abelson MB. Methodologies for the study of ocular surface disease. Ocul Surf. 2005;3:143-154.
21. Suzuki M, Massingale ML, Ye F, et al. Tear osmolarity as a biomarker for dry eye disease severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:4557-4561.
22. Young G, Riley CM, Chalmers RL, Hunt C. Hydrogel lens comfort in challenging environments and the effect of refitting with silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:302-308.
23. Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Parafita MA, Yebra-Pimentel E, Almeida JB. Symptoms in a population of contact lens and noncontact lens wearers under different environmental conditions. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:296-302.
24. Ramamoorthy P, Sinnott LT, Nichols JJ. Contact lens material characteristics associated with hydrogel lens dehydration. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010;30:160-166.
25. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Weed K. Ocular and subjective responses to frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses. CLAO J. 1996;22:53-59.
26. Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, Sariri R, Tighe B. Spoilation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:16-21.
27. Stahl U, Ho A, Brent G, Naduvilath T, Stapleton F. Measurements of solutions and contact lenses with a vapor pressure osmometer. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:321-327.
28. Karkkainen TR. Probing the hydrogel lens osmotic gradient. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80(suppl):6.
29. Iskeleli G, Karakoç Y, Aydin O, Yetik H, Uslu H, Kizilkaya M. Comparison of tear-film osmolarity in different types of contact lenses. CLAO J. 2002;28:174-176.
30. Miller WL, Doughty MJ, Narayanan S, et al. A comparison of tear volume (by tear meniscus height and phenol red thread test) and tear fluid osmolality measures in non-lens wearers and in contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2004;30:132-137.