|
Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 903-904
|
What is the evidence allowing us to state that transcatheter aortic valve replacement via the femoral artery is a more attractive option compared to transapical valve replacement?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AORTA VALVE STENOSIS;
ARTICLE;
CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
DEVICES;
DISEASE SEVERITY;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
FEMORAL ARTERY;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HIGH RISK PATIENT;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MEDICAL CARE;
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
SURGICAL APPROACH;
SURGICAL RISK;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
SURVIVAL RATE;
TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION;
AORTIC VALVE;
ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES;
FEMORAL ARTERY;
HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION;
HUMANS;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;
|
EID: 84855410395
PISSN: 1774024X
EISSN: 19696213
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.4244/EIJV7I8A143 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (4)
|