메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 903-904

What is the evidence allowing us to state that transcatheter aortic valve replacement via the femoral artery is a more attractive option compared to transapical valve replacement?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEVICES; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEALTH CARE COST; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL CARE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION;

EID: 84855410395     PISSN: 1774024X     EISSN: 19696213     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4244/EIJV7I8A143     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (8)

References (4)


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.