Quantitative evaluation of changes in eyeball shape in emmetropization and myopic changes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 8585-8591

  Ishii, Kotaro ^a   Iwata, Hiroyoshi ^b   Oshika, Tetsuro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A SCAN; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; ELLIPTIC FOURIER DESCRIPTOR; EMMETROPIA; EYE AXIS LENGTH; EYE REFRACTION; EYEBALL; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SCHOOL CHILD; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EYE; NEWBORN; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EMMETROPIA; EYE; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MYOPIA; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855374214     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7221     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Mutti DO, Sholtz RI, Friedman NE, Zadnik K. Peripheral refraction and ocular shape in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41: 1022-1030.
2. Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, et al. Axial growth and changes in lenticular and corneal power during emmetropization in infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3074-3080.
3. Mutti DO, Hayes JR, Mitchell GL, et al. Refractive error, axial length, and relative peripheral refractive error before and after the onset of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2510-2519.
4. Zhu L, Bartsch DU, Freeman WR, Sun PC, Fainman Y. Modeling human eye aberrations and their compensation for high-resolution retinal imaging. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:827-839.
5. Deller JFP, O'Connor AD, Sosby A. X-ray measurement of the diameters of the living eye. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1947;134: 456-467.
6. Atchison DA, Jones CE, Schmid KL, et al. Eye shape in emmetropia and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3380-3386.
7. Song HT, Kim YJ, Lee SJ, Moon YS. Relations between age, weight, refractive error and eye shape by computerized tomography in children. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2007;21:163-168.
8. Atchison DA, Pritchard N, Schmid KL, Scott DH, Jones CE, Pope JM. Shape of the retinal surface in emmetropia and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2698-2707.
9. Kuhl FP, Giardina CR. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comp Graphics Image Processing. 1982;18:236-258.
10. Iwata H, Niikura S, Matsuura S, Takano Y, Ukai Y. Evaluation of variation of root shape of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.) based on image analysis using elliptic Fourier descriptors. Euphytica. 1998;102:143-149.
11. Iwata H, Niikura S, Matsuura S, Takano Y, Ukai Y. Diallele analysis of root shape of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.) based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Breed Sci. 2000;50:73-80.
12. Iwata H, Ukai Y. SHAPE: A computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. J Hered. 2002;93:384-385.
13. McLellan T. The roles of heterochrony and heteroblasty in the diversification of leaf shapes in Begonia dregei (Begoniaceae). Am J Bot. 1993;80:796-804.
14. Ohsawa R, Tsutsumi T, Uehara H, Namai H, Ninomiya S. Quantitative evaluation of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) kernel shape by elliptic Fourier descriptor. Euphytica. 1998;101:175-183.
15. Diaz G, Zuccarelli A, Pelligra I, Ghiani A. Elliptic Fourier analysis of cell and nuclear shapes. Comp Biomed Res. 1989;22:405-414.
16. Ferson S, Rohlf FJ, Koehn RK. Measuring shape variation of twodimensional outlines. Syst Zool. 1985;34:59-68.
17. Rohlf FJ, Archie JW. A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Ritera culicidae). Syst Zool. 1984;33:302-317.
18. Stone RA, Flitcroft DI. Ocular shape and myopia. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33:7-15.
19. Schmucker C, Schaeffel F. A paraxial schematic eye model for the growing C57BL/6 mouse. Vision Res. 2004;44:1857-1867.
20. Zhou X, Shen M, Xie J, et al. The development of the refractive status and ocular growth in C57BL/6 mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:5208-5214.
21. Tkatchenko TV, Shen Y, Tkatchenko AV. Analysis of postnatal eye development in the mouse with high-resolution small animal magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:21-27.
22. Scammon RE. The measurement of body in childhood. In: Harris JA, Jackson CM, Paterson DG, Scammon RE, eds. Measurement of Man. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1930:173-215.
23. Gordon RA, Donzis PB. Refractive development of the human eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:785-789.
24. Singh KD, Logan NS, Gilmartin B. Three-dimensional modeling of the human eye based on magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2272-2279.