Transparency and openness in government: A system dynamics perspective

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 107-114

  Scholl, Hans J ^a   Luna Reyes, Luis F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS AMÉRICAS PUEBLA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Electronic government; Open government; Participation; Transparency

Indexed keywords

DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT; DYNAMIC PROCESS; ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT; GENERAL PUBLICS; INFORMATION FEEDBACK; LEGISLATIVE BRANCHES; MAJOR FACTORS; OPEN GOVERNMENT; PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC GOODS; SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODEL;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; SYSTEM THEORY;

TRANSPARENCY;

EID: 84855372134     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2072069.2072088     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Armstrong, C.L. Providing a clearer view: An examination of transparency on local government websites. Government Information Quarterly, 28 (1). 11-16.
2. Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T. and Grimes, J.M. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27 (3). 264-271.
3. Birkinshaw, P. Freedom of information and its impact in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly, 27 (4). 312-321.
4. Birkinshaw, P. Freedom of information and open government: The European community/union dimension. Government Information Quarterly, 14 (1). 27-49.
5. Cerrillo-i-MartÌnez, A. The regulation of diffusion of public sector information via electronic means: Lessons from the Spanish regulation. Government Information Quarterly, 28 (2). 188-199.
6. Cuillier, D. and Piotrowski, S.J. Internet informationseeking and its relation to support for access to government records. Government Information Quarterly, 26 (3). 441-449.
7. Dawes, S.S. Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15 (2). 377-394.
8. Dawes, S.S. Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 27 (4). 377-383.
9. Giroux, H.A. The emerging authoritarianism in the United States: Political culture under the Bush/Cheney administration. Symploke, 14 (1-2). 98-151.
10. Hazell, R. and Worthy, B. Assessing the performance of freedom of information. Government Information Quarterly, 27 (4). 352-359.
11. Horsley, J.P. Introduction on open government information implementation. Government Information Quarterly, 23 (1). 5-10.
12. Jaeger, P.T. and Bertot, J.C. Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly, 27 (4). 371-376.
13. Levinson, S. Constitutional dictators. Dissent, 56 (3). 99-106.
14. McClean, T. Who pays the piper? The political economy of freedom of information. Government Information Quarterly, 27 (4). 392-400.
15. McDermott, P. Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27 (4). 401-413.
16. Napoli, P.M. and Karaganis, J. On making public policy with publicly available data: The case of U.S. communications policymaking. Government Information Quarterly, 27 (4). 384-391.
17. Qiao, Z. Exploration and practice in promoting Shanghai municipal open government information. Government Information Quarterly, 23 (1). 28-35.
18. Relly, J.E. and Sabharwal, M. Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: A cross-national study. Government Information Quarterly, 26 (1). 148-157.
19. Relyea, H.C. Federal freedom of information policy: Highlights of recent developments. Government Information Quarterly, 26 (2). 314-320.
20. Sassen, S. Beyond flawed elections: Toward a privatized presidency. Theory and Event, 8 (2). 1-18.
21. Scholl, H.J. and Luna-Reyes, L.F., Uncovering Dynamics of Open Government, Transparency, Participation, and Collaboration. in Proceedings of the 44th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2011), (Kauai, Hawaii USA, 2011), IEEE Computer Society Conference Publishing Services, 1-11.
22. Wilson, S.C. and Linders, D. The open government directive: a preliminary assessment Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, ACM, Seattle, Washington, 2011.