Projecting long-run socioeconomic and demographic trends in California under the SRES A2 and B1 scenarios

Climatic Change

Volumn 109, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages 21-42

  Sanstad, Alan H ^a   Johnson, Hans ^b   Goldstein, Noah ^c   Franco, Guido ^d  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIFORNIA; CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT; DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS; ECONOMIC GROWTHS; ELECTRICITY PRICES; ENERGY SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FUTURE CLIMATE; GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGES; GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION; IMPACT STUDY; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGES; KEY VARIABLES; LOW CARBON ECONOMY; SOCIAL STRUCTURE; SPECIAL REPORT ON EMISSIONS SCENARIOS; STORYLINES;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GREENHOUSE GASES; POPULATION STATISTICS; RISK PERCEPTION;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; DEMOGRAPHY; ECONOMIC GROWTH; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE GAS; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84855359127     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0296-1     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abrishami M, Bender S, Lewis KC, Movassagh N, Puglia P, Sharp G, Sullivan K, Tian M, Valencia B, Vidivar D (2005) Energy Demand Forecast Methods Report: Companion Report to the California Energy Demand 2006-2016 Staff Energy Demand Forecast Report. Staff Report CEC-400-2005-036.
2. Arthur D Little, Inc (2002) Benefits of reducing demand for gasoline and diesel-vol. 3, Task 1 Report. Joint Report to the California Air Resources Board and the California Energy Commission, March 28.
3. Bauer PW, Lee Y (2006) Estimating GSP and labor productivity by state. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Policy Discussion Paper Number 16, March.
4. California Air Resources Board (2007) California 1990 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Level and 2020 Emissions Limit. Staff Report, Jamesine Rogers, Primary Author, November, 16.
5. California Air Resources Board (2008) Climate change draft scoping plan: A framework for change. June 2008 Discussion Draft.
6. Clarke KC, Gaydos LJ (1998) Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS-long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 12(7): 699-714.
7. Clarke L, Edmonds J, Jacoby H, Pitcher H, Reilly J, Richels R (2007) Scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric concentrations. Sub-report 2. 1A of Synthesis and Assessment Product 2. 1 by the U. S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Department of Energy, Office of Biological & Environmental Research, Washington, D. C. 154 pp.
8. Cox W (2008) Demographia World Urban Areas (World Agglomerations). Wendel Cox Consultancy, Illinois, 91 pp.
9. Davis SC, Diegel SW (2007) Transportation Energy Data Book-Edition 26. ORNL-6978 (Edition 26 of ORNL-5198); report prepared for the Office of Planning, Budget Formulation, and Analysis, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U. S. Department of Energy by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
10. ESRI (2007) U. S. Census Urbanized Areas Metadata. www.esri.com/data/community_data/census/overview.html.
11. Farrell AE, Brandt AR (2006) Risks of the oil transition. Environ Res Lett 1: 014004.
12. Franco G, Cayan D, Moser S, Hanemann M, Jones M (2011) Second California Assessment: Integrated Climate Change Impacts Assessment of Natural and Managed Systems. Climatic Change.
13. Fischer C, Morgenstern RD (2006) Carbon abatement costs: why the wide range of estimates? Energy J 27(2): 73-86.
14. IPCC (2000) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. N. Nakicenovic, Lead Author; N. Nakicenovic and R. Swart, Report Editors. Cambridge University Press.
15. Landis J (2001) CUF, CUF II, and CURBA: a family of spatially explicit urban growth and land-use policy simulation models. In: Brail RK, Klosterman RE (eds) Planning support systems: integrating geographic information systems, models and visualization tools. ESRI Press, Redlands, California, pp 157-200.
16. Landis J, Reilly M (2003) How we will grow: baseline projections of California's urban footprint through 2100. Department of City and Regional Planning Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley, October, www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2003-10-31_500-03-058CF_A03.PDF.
17. McPherson T, Brown M (2003) U. S. Day and Night Population Database (Revision 2. 0)-Description of Methodology. LA-UR-03-8389. Los Alamos National Laboratory, 30 pp.
18. Marshall L, Gorin T, principal authors (2007) California Energy Demand 2008-2018. Staff Revised Forecast. California Energy Commission Staff Final Report CEC-200-2007-015-SF2, November.
19. Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao Z-C (2007) Global Climate Projections. Chapter 10 in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.
20. National Research Council (NRC) 2010 Describing Socioeconomic Futures for Climate Change Research and Assessment: Report of a Workshop. Panel on Socioeconomic Scenarios for Climate Change Research and Assessment. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
21. Parker L, Yacobucci B (2008) Climate change: costs and benefits of S. 2191. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. Order Code RL34489, May 15.
22. Pendleton L, King P, Mohn C, Webster DG, Vaughn RK (2008) Estimating the potential economic impacts of climate change on Southern California Beaches. California Energy Commission draft paper.
23. Price S (2008) Electricity & natural gas GHG modeling: revised results and sensitivities. Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc., May, 13.
24. Ross M (2008) Personal communication, August.
25. Sanstad AH, Johnson H, Goldstein N, Franco G (2009) Long-run socioeconomic and demographic scenarios for California. California Energy Commission Final Paper CEC-500-2009-013F, August.
26. Smith SJ (2008) Personal communication, December.
27. State of California, Department of Finance (Undated) E-4 Population Estimates for California Cities and Counties, January 1, 1981 to January 1, 1990. Sacramento, California.
28. State of California, Department of Finance (2007) E-4 Historical Population Estimates for City, County, and the State, 1991-2000, with 1990 and 2000 Census Counts. Sacramento, California, August.
29. State of California, Department of Finance (2008) E-4 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2001-2008, with 2000 Benchmark. Sacramento, California, May.
30. State of California, Employment Development Department (2005) Historical Civilian Labor Force [Not Seasonally-Adjusted] 1976 to 1989; March 2004 Benchmark. Sacramento, California, April.
31. State of California, Employment Development Department (2007) Population projections for California and its counties 2000-2050, by age gender and race/ethnicity, Sacramento, California, July.
32. State of California, Employment Development Department (2009) Historical Civilian Labor Force [Not Seasonally-Adjusted]; March 2007 Benchmark. Sacramento, California, January.
33. United Nations (2006) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2005 Revision. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat.
34. United Nations (2007) World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat.
35. United States President (2008) Economic Report of the President-Transmitted to the Congress February 2008, together with the Annual Report of the Council of Economic Advisers. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, February.
36. U. S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2008) National Income and Product Accounts.
37. U. S. Census Bureau (2000) Table NP-T1 in Annual Projections of the Total Resident Population as of July 1: Middle, Lowest, Highest, and Zero International Migration Series, 1999-2100.
38. U. S. Energy Information Administration (2007) Annual Energy Review. Report No. DOE/EIA-0384(2007).
39. U. S. Energy Information (2008) State Energy Data System. February release.
40. U. S. Energy Information Administration (2008) Annual Energy Outlook 2008. Report #DOE/EIA-0383(2008), June.
41. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (2008) EPA Analysis of the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2008-S. 2191 in 100th Congress. U. S. EPA Office of Atmospheric Programs, March 14.
42. United States President (2008b) Economic Report of the President Transmitted to the Congress together with The Annual Report of the Council of Economic Advisers. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
43. Wilson D (2002) Productivity in the Twelfth District. FRBSF [Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco] Economic Letter Number 2002-33, November 8.
44. Yi Z, Land KC, Wang Z, Gu D (2006) U. S. family household momentum and dynamics: An extension and application of the ProFamy method. Popul Res Policy Rev 25: 1-41.