Predictors of recruited melanoma families into a behavioral intervention project

Contemporary Clinical Trials

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 85-92

  Bowen, Deborah J ^a   Hay, Jennifer L ^b   Mayer, Joni ^c   Kuniyuki, Alan ^d   Meischke, Hendrika ^e   Harris, Julie ^f   Asgari, Maryam ^g   Shoveller, Jeannie ^h   Press, Nancy ⁱ   Burke, Wylie ^e  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

ⁱ OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral intervention; Family; Melanoma; Recruitment; Response rates

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER RESEARCH; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FAMILY ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MELANOMA; PARENT; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RELATIVE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; FAMILY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MELANOMA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKIN NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855339875     PISSN: 15517144     EISSN: 15592030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.016     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Lindor N., Lindor C., Greene M. Hereditary neoplastic syndromes. Cancer epidemiology and prevention 2006, 562-565. Oxford University PRess, New York. J. Schottenfeld, D (Eds.).
2. Cappelli M., Surh L., Walker M., Korneluk Y., Humphreys L., Verma S., et al. Psychological and social predictors of decisions about genetic testing for breast cancer in high-risk women. Psychol Health Med 2001, 6(3):321-333.
3. Friedman L.C., Webb J.A., Everett T.E. Psychosocial and medical predictors of colorectal cancer screening among low-income medical outpatients. J Cancer Educ 2004, 19(3):180-186.
4. McCaul K.D., Branstetter A.D., Schroeder D.M., Glasgow R.E. What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review. Health Psychol 1996, 15(6):423-429.
5. Pitceathly C., Maguire P. The psychological impact of cancer on patients' partners and other key relatives: a review. Eur J Cancer 2003, 39(11):1517-1524.
6. Novilla M.L., Barnes M.D., De La Cruz N.G., Williams P.N., Rogers J. Public health perspectives on the family: an ecological approach to promoting health in the family and community. Fam Community Health 2006, 29(1):28-42.
7. Northouse L.L., Mellon S., Harden J., Schafenacker A. Effects of cancer on families of adult cancer survivors. Handbook of Cancer Control and Behavioral Science: A Resource for Researchers, Practitioners, and Policymakers 2009, American Psychological Association, Washington D.C. S.M. Miller, D.J. Bowen, R.T. Croyle (Eds.).
8. Anton-Culver H., Ziogas A., Bowen D., Finkelstein D., Griffin C., Hanson J., et al. The cancer genetics network: recruitment results and pilot studies. Community Genet 2003, 6(3):171-177.
9. Bowen D., Thornquist M., Goodman G., Omenn G.S., Anderson K., Barnett M., et al. Effects of incentive items on participation in a randomized chemoprevention trial. J Health Psychol 2000, 5(1):109-115.
10. Bowen D.J., Cartmel B., Barnett M., Goodman G., Omenn G.S. Predictors of participant retention in two chemoprevention feasibility trials. Ann Behav Med 1999, 21(3):210-215.