A resounding success or a disastrous failure: Re-examining the interpretation of evidence on the Portuguese decriminalisation of illicit drugs

Drug and Alcohol Review

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 101-113

  Hughes, Caitlin Elizabeth ^a   Stevens, Alex ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855335229     PISSN: 09595236     EISSN: 14653362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00383.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Pinto Coelho M. The 'resounding success' of Portuguese drug policy: the power of an attractive fallacy. Lisboa: Associação para uma Portugal livre de drogas, 2010.
2. Greenwald G. Drug decriminalization in Portugal: lessons for creating fair and successful drug policies. Washington, DC: CATO Institute, 2009.
3. Gallagher P. The deceitful world of anti-drug zealots. The Australian heroin diaries; 2011 February 8. Available at: (accessed 14 Feb 2011).
4. Humphreys K. Scientific proof that drug decriminalization in Portugal saved lives and killed people. The reality-based community; 2010 October 18. Available at: (accessed 14 Feb 2011).
5. Baxter J. Portugal-the real facts. ADCA Update; 2011 February 2. Available at: (accessed 2 Feb 2011).
6. Manski CF. Policy analysis with incredible certitude. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2010. Contract No: 16207.
7. Monaghan M. Evidence versus politics: exploiting research in UK drug policy making? Bristol: Policy Press, 2011.
8. Hughes CE, Stevens A. What can we learn from the Portuguese decriminalization of illicit drugs? Br J Criminol 2010;50:999-1022.
9. Instituto Nacional de Administração. Avaliação da estratégia nacional da luta contra a droga 1999-2003. Versão final. Oeiras: Instituto Nacional de Administração, 2004.
10. Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodependência. Conclusões da avaliação da estratégia nacional de luta contra a droga 1999/2004. Lisboa: Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodependência, 2004.
11. Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodependência I.P. Plano de Acção-horizonte 2008: relatório de avaliação interna. Lisboa: Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodependência, 2009. Released April 2010.
12. Institute for Drugs and Drug Addiction. 2010 National Report (2009 data) to the EMCDDA by the REITOX National Focal Point: Portugal: new development, trends and in-depth information on selected issues. Lisbon: Institute for Drugs and Drug Addiction, 2010.
13. Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodependência. Relatório anual 2009-a situação do país em matéria de drogas e toxicodependências. Volume I-informação estatística. Lisboa: Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodependência, 2010.
14. Van Beusekom I, Van Het Loo M, Kahan J. Guidelines for implementing and evaluating the Portuguese drug strategy. Lisbon: RAND Europe, 2002. Report No.: MR-1508.
15. Van Het Loo M, Van Beusekom I, Kahan J. Decriminalization of drug use in Portugal: the development of a policy. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 2002;582:49-63.
16. Hughes C, Stevens A. The effects of decriminalization of drug use in Portugal. Briefing paper 14. London: Beckley Foundation, 2007.
17. Vale de Andrade P, Carapinha L. Drug decriminalisation in Portugal. Br Med J 2010;341:c4554.
18. Vale de Andrade P, Carapinha L. Drug decriminalisation in Portugal: reply. Br Med J 2010;341:c4554.
19. Szalavitz M. Drugs in Portugal: did decriminalization work? Time Magazine. 2009 April 26.
20. The Economist. Portugal's drug policy: treating not punishing. The Economist. 2009 April 27.
21. Vastag B. 5years after: Portugal's drug decriminalization policy shows positive results. Scientific American. 2009 April 7.
22. Windish J. Drug decriminalization working in Portugal. The Moderate Voice. 2009 April 27.
23. Pinto Coelho M. Decriminalization of drugs in Portugal-the real facts! Stockholm: World Federation Against Drugs, 2010 February 2. Available at: (accessed 24 Feb 2011).
24. Pinto Coelho M. Britain should not make the same mistakes as Portugal. Stockholm: World Federation Against Drugs, 2010 October 2. Available at: (accessed 24 Feb 2011).
25. Pinto Coelho M. Best Portugal advice to the world: don't follow us. Stockholm: World Federation Against Drugs, 2011 January 1. Available at: (accessed 24 Feb 2011).
26. Pinto Coelho M. Re: drug decriminalisation in Portugal. Br Med J 2010;341:c4554.
27. Fay C. Letter: enabling Portuguese junkies. The Washington Post. 2011 January 3.
28. Matos M, Simões C, Gaspar T, etal. Consumo de substâncias dos adolescentes Portugueses: estilo de vida? À procura de um estilo? Lisboa: IDT, 2008.
29. Matos M, Simões C, Carvalhosa S, Reis C. Aventura social & saúde. A saúde dos adolescentes Portugueses. Estudo nacional da rede Europeia HBSC/OMS (1998). Lisboa: FMH/PEPT-Saúde, 2000.
30. Matos M. Equipa do projecto aventura social e saúde. Aventura social & saúde. A saúde dos adolescentes Portugueses (Quatro anos depois). Lisboa: FMH, 2003.
31. Hibell B, Guttormsson U, Ahlström S, etal. The 2007 ESPAD report-Substance use among students in 35 European countries. Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAN) and the Pompidou Group at the Council of Europe, 2009.
32. Feijão F, Lavado E. Os adolescentes e a droga-Portugal 2003: estudo sobre o consumo de alcool, tabaco e droga, em alunos do ensino público-Portugal continental/2003 (ECATD/2003). Lisboa: Observatório de Drogas e Toxicodependências, Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodependência, 2003.
33. Feijão F. Drug use among teenagers, by age group: Portugal 2003-2007 (ECATD/ESPAD). Lisbon: IDT, 2009.
34. Feijão F, Lavado E. Inquérito nacional em meio escolar-2001-Ensino secundário. Lisboa: IDT, 2004.
35. Feijão F. Inquérito nacional em meio escolar-2006: Consumo de drogas e outras substâncias psicoactivas: uma abordagem integrada: Resultados preliminares. 18 Abril 2008; Évora: Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodependência, 2008.
36. Balsa C, Farinha T, Urbano C, Francisco A. Inquérito nacional ao consumo de substâncias psicoactivas na população Portuguesa-2001. Lisboa: CEOS, Investigações Sociológicas, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2004.
37. Balsa C, Vital C, Urbano C, Pascueiro L. II Inquérito nacional ao consumo de substâncias psicoactivas na população Portuguesa-2007. Lisboa: CEOS, Investigações Sociológicas, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2007.
38. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Methodology-World drug report 2010. Geneva: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2010.
39. World Health Organization. Guide to drug abuse epidemiology. WHO/MSD/MSB/00.3. Geneva: WHO, 2000.
40. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Annual report 2010: the state of the drugs problem in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2010.
41. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Geneva: WHO, 2007.
42. Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodependência. Relatório anual 2008-a situação do país em matéria de drogas e toxicodependências. Volume I-informação estatística. Lisboa: Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodependência, 2009.
43. Tavares C, Thomas G. Statistics in focus: population and social conditions 19/2008: Eurostat. Luxembourg: Eurostat, 2008.
44. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World drug report 2009. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2009.
45. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Annual report 2007: the state of the drugs problem in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2007.
46. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Annual report 2009: the state of the drugs problem in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2009.
47. Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith H, eds. Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992.
48. Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive. Factiva. New York: Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive, 2011 26 February.
49. Opinion: Prop 19 will not increase usage. Go Prop 19.com. 2010. Available at: (accessed 11 Mar 2011).
50. Barnett B. Opinion: vote 'yes' on Prop. 19. Sierra Star. 2010 October 30.
51. Editorial: reasons to support Proposition 19 are numerous; vote yes. Morgan Hill Times. 2010 September 21.
52. Miron JA. Marijuana legalization in California. The Harvard Crimson. 2010 May 27.
53. Messamore SE. If cannabis is legalized, Portugal could be a window into California's future. San Rafael, CA: The California Independent Voter Network, 2010 June 26. Available at: (accessed 11 Mar 2011).
54. Cardoso FH. The war on drugs is lost. The Toronto Star. 2011 January 23; A17.
55. Babor TF, Caulkins JP, Edwards G, etal. Drug policy and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
56. Stevens A. Drugs, crime and public health: the political economy of drug policy. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.
57. Conan N. Mixed results for Portugal's great drug experiment. National Public Radio-Talk of the Nation. 2011 January 20.
58. Hansard debate c1673: drug use and possession: royal commission-question for short debate, House of Lords. (2011 March 11).
59. World Federation Against Drugs. Review of all available data of the overall impact of the decriminalization of the purchase, possession, and use of illicit drugs in Portugal. 2010 August 4. Available at: (accessed 24 Feb 2011).
60. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). Reconsidering the decriminalization of drugs in Portugal. n.d. Available at: (accessed 24 Feb 2011).
61. Global Commission on Drugs Policy. War on drugs. Ipanema: Brazil Global Commission on Drugs Policy, 2011.