Approximations to the Truth: Comparing Survey and Microsimulation Approaches to Measuring Income for Social Indicators

Social Indicators Research

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 387-407

  Figari, Francesco ^a,b   Iacovou, Maria ^a   Skew, Alexandra J ^a   Sutherland, Holly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Europe; Income; Inequality; Microsimulation; Poverty

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; POVERTY; SOCIOECONOMIC INDICATOR; SURVEY; TAX SYSTEM;

AUSTRIA; HUNGARY; ITALY; SPAIN;

EID: 84855324115     PISSN: 03038300     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-010-9775-4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Atkinson, A. B., & Brandolini, A. (2001). Promise and pitfalls in the use of "secondary" data-sets: Income inequality in OECD countries as a case study. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(3), 771-799.
2. Atkinson, A. B., Rainwater, L., & Smeeding, T. M. (1995). Income distribution in OECD countries: evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study (Vol. 18). Paris: OECD Social Policy Studies.
3. Behrendt, C. (2002). Do income surveys overestimate poverty in Western Europe? Evidence from a comparison with institutional frameworks. Social Indicators Research, 58, 429-440.
4. Bound, J., Brown, C., Duncan, G. J., & Rodgers, W. L. (1990). Measurement error in cross-sectional and longitudinal labor market surveys: Validation study evidence. In J. Hartog, G. Ridder, & J. Theeuwes (Eds.), Panel data and labor market studies (pp. 1-20). New York: Elsevier.
5. Bound, J., Brown, C., & Mathiowetz, N. (2001). Measurement error in survey data. In J. J. Heckman & E. Leamer (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (Vol. 5, pp. 3705-3843). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
6. Burkhauser, R. V., Feng, S., Jenkins, S. P., & Larrimore, J. (2008). Estimating trends in US income inequality using the current population survey: The importance of controlling for censoring, ISER Working Paper 2007-25. UK: University of Essex.
7. Di Marco, M. (2007). Self-employment incomes in the Italian EU-SILC: Measurement and international comparability. In European Commission, comparative EU statistics on income and living conditions: issues and challenges, proceedings of the EU-SILC conference (Helsinki, November 2006) (pp. 143-156). Eurostat methodologies and working papers. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
8. Ehling, M., & Rendtel, U. (Eds.). (2004). Harmonisation of panel surveys and data quality. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.
9. European Commission. (2009). Description of SILC user database variables: Cross-sectional and longitudinal, Version 2007. 2. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
10. Figari, F., Levy, H., & Sutherland, H. (2007). Using the EU-SILC for policy simulation: prospects, some limitations and suggestions. In European Commission, comparative EU statistics on income and living conditions: Issues and challenges, proceedings of the EU-SILC conference (Helsinki, November 2006) (pp. 345-368). Eurostat methodologies and working papers. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
11. Fiorio, C. V., & D'Amuri, F. (2006). Tax evasion in Italy: An analysis using a tax-benefit microsimulation model. The IUP Journal of Public Finance, 4(2), 19-37.
12. Fuchs, M. (2009). Social assistance no, thanks? Empirical analysis of non take up in Austria 2003. EUROMOD WP EM4/2007. Colchester: University of Essex.
13. Hegedus, P., Lietz, C., & Szivos, P. (2008). EUROMOD country report-Hungary 2005. http://www. iser. essex. ac. uk/files/msu/emod/documentation/countries/hungary/CR_HU2005_v1. pdf.
14. Hungarian Central Statistical Office-KSH. (2009). Intermediate quality report for EU-SILC 2007 operation, cross sectional data, Hungary. Budapest: KSH.
15. Jäckle, A., Sala, E., Jenkins, S. P., & Lynn, P. (2005). Validating survey data: Experiences using employer records and government benefit (transfer) data in the UK. In Proceedings of the survey research methods section of the American Statistical Association (pp. 4802-4810).
16. Jäntti, M. (2009). Issues in modelling the take-up of social transfers in the presence of measurement errors for static microsimulation models. AIM-AP report 2. 17. http://www. iser. essex. ac. uk/files/msu/emod/aim-ap/deliverables/AIM-AP2. 17. pdf.
17. Jenkins, S. P., Lynn, P., Jäckle, A., & Sala, E. (2008). The feasibility of linking household survey and administrative record data: New evidence for Britain. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 29-43.
18. Lambert, P. J. (2001). The distribution and redistribution of income. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
19. Levy, H., & Mercader-Prats, M. (2003). EUROMOD country report-Spain 2001. http://www. iser. essex. ac. uk/files/msu/emod/documentation/countries/spain/cr01sp0903. pdf.
20. Lietz, C., & Mantovani, D. (2007). A short introduction to EUROMOD: An integrated European tax-benefit model. In O. Bargain (Ed.), Micro-simulation in action: Policy analysis in Europe using EUROMOD (Vol. 25). Research in Labor Economics, Elsevier.
21. Lietz, C., & Sutherland, H. (2005). Social indicators and other income statistics using EUROMOD: An assessment of the 2001 baseline and changes 1998-2001. EUROMOD working paper EM6/05. Colchester: University of Essex.
22. Lynn, P., Jäckle, A., Jenkins, S. P. & Sala, E. (2004). The impact of interviewing method on measurement error in panel survey measures of benefit receipt: Evidence from a validation study. ISER working paper 2004-28. Colchester: University of Essex.
23. Mantovani, D. & Sutherland, H. (2003). Social indicators and other income statistics using the EUROMOD baseline: A comparison with Eurostat and national statistics. EUROMOD working paper EM1/03. Colchester: University of Essex.
24. Matsaganis, M., Paulus, A., & Sutherland, H. (2008). The take up of social benefits. Research note 2/2008 of the European Observatory on the Social Situation and Demography. European Commission. http://www. socialsituation. eu/WebApp/ResearchNotes. aspx.
25. Meyer, B. D., Mok, W. K. C., & Sullivan, J. X. (2009). The under-reporting of transfers in household surveys: Its nature and consequences. NBER working paper 1518. Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research.
26. OECD. (2008). Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.
27. Pudney, S., & Sutherland, H. (1994). How reliable are microsimulation results? An analysis of the role of sampling error in a U. K. tax-benefit model. Journal of Public Economics, 53, 327-365.
28. Paulus, A., Čok, M., Figari, F., Hegedüs, P., Kump, N., Lelkes, O., et al. (2009). The effects of taxes and benefits on income distribution in the enlarged EU. In O. Lelkes & H. Sutherland (Eds.), Tax and benefit policies in the enlarged Europe: Assessing the impact with microsimulation models. Ashgate.
29. Schubert, K., Hegelich, S., & Bazant, U. (2009). The handbook of European welfare systems. Routledge.
30. Sutherland, H. (2007). EUROMOD: The tax-benefit microsimulation model for the European Union. In A. Gupta & A. Harding (Eds.), Modelling our future: Population ageing, health and aged care. International symposia in economic theory and econometrics (Vol. 16, pp. 483-488). Elsevier.
31. Sutherland, H., Decoster, A., Matsaganis, M., & Tsakloglou, P. (2009). Accurate income measurement for the assessment of public policies-final report. EUROMOD working paper EM7/09. Colchester: University of Essex.