Retraction of Visual perspective influences the use of metacognitive information in temporal comparisons [Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, (2012), 32-50] DOI:10.1037/a0026106;Visual perspective influences the use of metacognitive information in temporal comparisons

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 32-50

  Johnson, Camille S ^a   Smeesters, Dirk ^b   Wheeler, S Christian ^c  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Construal level; Ease of retrieval; Self concept; Temporal comparison; Visual perspective

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855319841     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0030145     Document Type: Erratum

References (46)

1. Albert S. Temporal comparison theory. Psychological Review 1977, 84:485-503. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.6.485.
2. Belk R.W. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 1988, 15:139-168. doi: 10.1086/209154.
3. Caruso E.M. Use of experienced retrieval ease in self and social judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44:148-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.11.003.
4. Carver C.S., Scheier M.F. On the self-regulation of behavior 1998, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
5. Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980, 39:752-766. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752.
6. DeMarree K.G., Wheeler S.C., Petty R.E. Priming a new identity: Self-monitoring moderates the effects of nonself primes on self-judgments and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 89:657-671. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.657.
7. Dijksterhuis A., Spears R., Postmes T., Stapel D., Koomen W., van Knippenberg A., Scheepers D. Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75:862-871. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.862.
8. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Buchner A., Lang A.G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 2009, 41:1149-1160. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
9. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.G., Buchner A. G*Power3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39:175-191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.
10. Frank M.G., Gilovich T. Effect of memory perspective on retrospective causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 57:399-403. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.399.
11. Gao L., Wheeler S.C., Shiv B. The "shaken self": Product choices as a means of restoring self-view confidence. Journal of Consumer Research 2009, 36:29-38. doi: 10.1086/596028.
12. Hastie R., Park B. The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review 1986, 93:258-268. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.258.
13. Herzog S.M., Hansen J., Wänke M. Temporal distance and ease of retrieval. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2007, 43:483-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.008.
14. Hsee C.K., Abelson R.P. Velocity relation: Satisfaction as a function of the first derivative of outcome over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991, 60:341-347. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.341.
15. Johnson C.S., Stapel D.A. No pain, no gain: The conditions under which upward comparisons lead to better performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 92:1051-1067. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1051.
16. Johnson C.S., Stapel D.A. When different is better: Performance following upward comparison. European Journal of Social Psychology 2007, 37:258-275. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.361.
17. Koo M., Fishbach A. Dynamics of self-regulation: How (un)accomplished goal actions affect motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 94:183-195. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.183.
18. Kuhn M.H., McPartland T.S. An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review 1954, 19:68-76. doi: 10.2307/2088175.
19. LeBoeuf R.A., Shafir E., Bayuk J.B. The conflicting choices of alternating selves. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2010, 111:48-61. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.08.004.
20. Libby L.K., Eibach R.P. Looking back in time: Self-concept change affects visual perspective in autobiographical memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:167-179. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.167.
21. Libby L.K., Eibach R.P., Gilovich T. Here's looking at me: The effect of memory perspective on assessments of personal change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88:50-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.50.
22. Libby L.K., Shaeffer E.M., Eibach R.P. Seeing meaning in action: A bidirectional link between visual perspective and action identification level. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2009, 138:503-516. doi: 10.1037/a0016795.
23. Libby L.K., Shaeffer E.M., Eibach R.P., Slemmer J.A. Picture yourself at the polls: Visual perspective in mental imagery affects self-perception and behavior. Psychological Science 2007, 18:199-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01872.x.
24. Liberman N., Trope Y., Stephan E. Psychological distance. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles 2007, 353-381. Guilford Press, New York, NY. A.W. Kruglanski, E.T. Higgins (Eds.).
25. Lorey B., Bischoff M., Pilgramm S., Stark R., Munzert J., Zentgraf K. The embodied nature of motor imagery: The influence of posture and perspective. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 194:233-243. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1693-1.
26. Mussweiler T., Strack F. The relative self: Informational and judgmental consequences of comparative self-evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 79:23-38. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.23.
27. Pelham B.W., Sumarta T.T., Myaskovsky L. The easy path from many to much: The numerosity heuristic. Cognitive Psychology 1994, 26:103-133. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1994.1004.
28. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches 1981, Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, IA.
29. Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2004, January 29). Moderation of form vs. degree: A neglected distinction in social psychology. Poster presentation at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Austin, TX.
30. Preacher K.J., Rucker D.D., Hayes A.F. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2007, 42:185-227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316.
31. Reed A. Activating the self-importance of consumer selves: Exploring identity salience effects on judgments. Journal of Consumer Research 2004, 31:286-295.
32. Rothman A.J. Toward a theory-based analysis of behavioral maintenance. Health Psychology 2000, 19:64-69. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19. Suppl 1.64.
33. Schouten J.W. Selves in transition: Symbolic consumption in personal rites of passage and identity reconstruction. Journal of Consumer Research 1991, 17:412-425. doi: 10.1086/208567.
34. Schwarz N. Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1998, 2:87-99. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_2.
35. Schwarz N., Bless H., Strack F., Klumpp G., Rittenauer-Schatka H., Simons A. Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991, 61:195-202. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195.
36. Shaeffer E.M. Shifting perspectives: Point of view in visual images affects abstract and concrete thinking 2009, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
37. Stapel D.A., Koomen W. The impact of interpretation versus comparison mindsets on knowledge accessibility effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2001, 37:134-149. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1440.
38. Tesser A., Crepaz N., Collins J.C., Cornell D., Beach S.R.H. Confluence of self-esteem regulation mechanisms: On integrating the self-zoo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2000, 26:1476-1489. doi: 10.1177/01461672002612003.
39. Tormala Z.L., Petty R.E., Briñol P. Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002, 28:1700-1712. doi: 10.1177/014616702237651.
40. Trope Y., Liberman N. Construal level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review 2010, 117:440-463. doi: 10.1037/a0018963.
41. Tsai C.I., McGill A.L. No pain, no gain? How fluency and construal level affect consumer confidence. Journal of Consumer Research 2011, 37:807-821. doi: 10.1086/655855.
42. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 1973, 5:207-232. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9.
43. Vasquez N.A., Buehler R. Seeing future success: Does imagery perspective influence achievement motivation?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2007, 33:1392-1405.
44. Wicklund R.A., Gollwitzer P.M. Symbolic self-completion 1982, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
45. Wilson A.E., Ross M. The frequency of temporal-self and social comparisons in people's personal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 78:928-942. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.928.
46. Wilson A.E., Ross M. From chump to champ: People's appraisals of their earlier and present selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 80:572-584. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.572.