Farmland prices and land-use changes in periurban protected natural areas

Land Use Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 674-683

  Abelairas Etxebarria, Patricia ^a   Astorkiza, Inma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Densely populated areas; Externality; Farming decline; Land development control policies; Land use change; Non compliance; Protected natural areas; Spatial hedonic farmland price model

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LAND USE CHANGE; METROPOLITAN AREA; PERIURBAN AREA; PROTECTED AREA; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

BASQUE COUNTRY; BILBAO; SPAIN; VIZCAYA;

EID: 84855293263     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aldanondo A., Casanovas V. Análisis espacial del abandono de explotaciones agrarias en Navarra. Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros 2009, 222:73-101.
2. Anselin L. Some robust approaches to testing and estimation in spatial econometrics. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1990, 20:141-163.
3. Anselin L. SpaceStat Tutorial 1992, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Urbana, USA.
4. Anselin L., Bera A., Florax R., Yoon M. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Reginal Science and Urban Economics 1996, 26:77-104.
5. Anselin L., LeGallo J. Interpolation of air quality measures in hedonic house price models: spatial aspects. Spatial Economic Analysis 2006, 1:31-52.
6. Asabere P.K., Huffman F.E. Price determinants of foreclosed urban land. Urban Studies 1992, 29:701-707.
7. Barrenetxea J.C. Situación actual y regulación jurídica de los núcleos rurales en la Reserva de la Biosfera de Urdaibai, Gernika-Lumo. Patronato de la Reserva de Urdaibai 2000, Gernika-Lumo, Spain.
8. Bastian C.T., McLeod D.M., Germino M.J., Reiners W.A., Blasko B.J. Environmental amenities and agricultural land values: a hedonic model using geographic information systems data. Ecological Economics 2002, 40:337-349.
9. Bera A., Yoon M. Specification testing with locally misspecified alternatives. Econometric Theory 1993, 9:649-658.
10. Can A. Specification and estimation of hedonic housing price models. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1992, 22:453-474.
11. Cassetti E. The investigation of parameter drift by expanded regressions: generalities and a family planning example. Environmental Planning A 1991, 23:1045-1051.
12. Craig L.A., Palmquist R.B., Weiss T. Transportation improvements and land values in the antebellum United States: a hedonic approach. The Journal of Real Estate Finance Economics 1998, 16:173-189.
13. Cropper M.L., Deck L.B., McConnell K.E. On choice of functional form for hedonic price functions. Review Economics Statistics 1988, 70:668-675.
14. Cho S., Newman D.H. Spatial analysis of rural land development. Forest Policy and Economics 2005, 7:732-744.
15. Dale-Johnson D., Brzeski W.J. Land value functions and land price indexes in Cracow, 1993-1999. Journal of Housing Economics 2001, 10:307-334.
16. Elhorst P. Applied Spatial Econometrics: Raising the Bar. Spatial Economic Analysis 2010, 5:9-28.
17. European Environment Agency. 2010. Land in Europe: prices, taxes and use patterns. EEA Technical Report 4.
18. Florax R., Folmer H., Rey S. Specification searches in spatial econometrics: the relevance of Hendry's methodology. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2003, 33:557-579.
19. Hansen J.D., Kristensen G. Price profiles for land in Danish urban areas. Urban Studies 1991, 28:277-287.
20. Henger R., Bizer K. Tradable planning permits for land-use control in Germany. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:843-852.
21. Huang H., Miller G.Y., Sherrick B.S., Gómez M.I. Factors influencing Illinois farmland values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2006, 88:458-470.
22. Irwin E.G. The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics 2002, 78:465-480.
23. Kim C.W., Phipps T.T., Anselin L. Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003, 45:24-39.
24. Milon J.W., Gressel J., Mulkey D. Hedonic amenity valuation and functional form specification. Land Economics 1984, 60:378-387.
25. Mur J., Angulo A. Model selection strategies in spatial settings: some additional results. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2009, 39:200-213.
26. Mur J., Lopez F., Angulo A. Testing the hypothesis of stability in spatial econometric models. Papers in Regional Science 2009, 88:409-444.
27. Murua J.R., Astorkiza I., Ferrero A., Etxano I. Retos del Plan Rector de Uso y Gestión de la Reserva de la Biosfera de Urdaibai. XXVII Reunión de Estudios Regionales 2001.
28. Overmars K.P., de Koning G.H.J., Veldkamp A. Spatial autocorrelation in multi-scale land use models. Ecological Modelling 2003, 164:257-570.
29. Observatorio de la Sostenibilidad en España, 2009. Sostenibilidad en España 2009. Mundi Prensa Libros S.A., Madrid.
30. Pace K., Lesage J. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics 2009, Chapman & Hall/CRC, London.
31. Páez A., Takashi U., Kazuaki M. Spatial association and heterogeneity issues in land price models. Urban Studies 2001, 38:1493-1508.
32. Patton M., McErlean S. Spatial effects within the agricultural land market in Northern Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2003, 54:35-54.
33. Plantinga A.J., Lubowski R., Stavins R. The effects of potential land development on agricultural land prices. Journal of Urban Economics 2002, 52:561-581.
34. Pruetz R. Beyond Takings and Givings 2003, Arje Press.
35. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 1974, 82:34-55.