Factors controlling vegetation structure in peatland lakes-Two conceptual models of plant zonation

Aquatic Botany

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 42-47

  Banaś, Krzysztof ^a   Gos, Krzysztof ^a   Szmeja, Józef ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GDA SK   (Poland)

Author keywords

Aquatic plants; Peatland lakes; Plant zonation; Sphagnum species; Underwater peat wall

Indexed keywords

BRYOPHYTE; COLOR; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; HUMIC ACID; IRRADIANCE; MOSS; OXYGENATION; PEATLAND; PHYTOMASS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SUBSTRATE; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON; VEGETATION STRUCTURE; ZONATION;

BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; SPHAGNUM; SPHAGNUM CUSPIDATUM; SPHAGNUM DENTICULATUM; SPHAGNUM RIPARIUM; TRACHEOPHYTA; WARNSTORFIA EXANNULATA;

EID: 84855268962     PISSN: 03043770     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2011.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aerts R., Wallén B., Malmer N. Growth-limiting nutrients in Sphagnum-dominated bogs subject to low and high atmospheric nitrogen supply. J. Ecol. 1992, 80:131-140.
2. Austin M.P., Smith T.M. A new model for the continuum concept. Vegetatio 1989, 83:35-47.
3. Banaś K. Impact of humic substances on Sphagnum denticulatum Bridel habitats. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2002, 71:63-69.
4. Banaś K. Morphology of peatland lakes. Limnol. Rev. 2010, 10:3-14.
5. Barko J.W., Gunnison D., Carpenter S.R. Sediment interactions with submersed macrophyte growth and community dynamics. Aquat. Bot. 1991, 41:41-65.
6. Bociag K., Szmeja J. Changes in the vegetation of softwater lakes under the influence of humic substances. Pol. J. Ecol. 2001, 49:319-329.
7. Dodson S.I., Arnott S.E., Cottingham K.L. The relationship in lake communities between primary productivity and species richness. Ecology 2000, 81:2662-2679.
8. Eaton A.D., Clesceri L.S., Rice E.W., Greenberg A.E. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, Washington. 21st ed.
9. Farmer A.M., Spence D.H.N. The growth strategies and distribution of isoetids in Scottish freshwater lochs. Aquat. Bot. 1986, 26:247-258.
10. Hays W.L. Statistics 1988, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, p. 723. 3rd ed.
11. Heegaard E., Birks H.H., Gibson C.E., Smith S.J., Wolfe-Murphy S. Species-environmental relationships of aquatic macrophytes in Northern Ireland. Aquat. Bot. 2001, 70:175-223.
12. Horppila J., Nurminen L. Effects of different macrophyte growth forms on sediment and P resuspension in a shallow lake. Hydrobiologia 2005, 545:167-175.
13. Ilyashuk B.P. Growth and production of aquatic mosses in acidified lakes of Karelia Republic, Russia. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2002, 135:285-290.
14. Karttunen K., Toivonen H. Ecology of aquatic bryophyte assemblages in 54 small Finnish lakes, and their change in 30 years. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 1995, 32:75-90.
15. Lehmann A., Castella E., Lachavanne J.-B. Morphological traits and spatial heterogeneity of aquatic plants along sediment and depth gradients, Lake Geneva, Switzerland. Aquat. Bot. 1997, 55:281-299.
16. Madsen J.D., Chambers P.A., James W.F., Koch E.W., Westlake D.F. The interaction between water movement, sediment dynamics and submersed macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 2001, 444:71-84.
17. Mäkirinta U. Classification of south Swedish Isoetid vegetation with the help of numerical methods. Vegetatio 1989, 81:145-157.
18. Meister K., Liebert H.-P. A new method for evaluation of a bog ecosystem by measuring the Sphagnum vitality. Herzogia 2004, 17:287-302. (in German).
19. Murphy K.J. Plant communities and plant diversity in softwater lakes of northern Europe. Aquat. Bot. 2002, 73:287-324.
20. Rooney N., Kalff J. Inter-annual variation in submerged macrophyte community biomass and distribution: the influence of temperature and lake morphometry. Aquat. Bot. 2000, 68:321-335.
21. Rørslett B. A gradient spatial niche model for aquatic macrophytes. Aquat. Bot. 1987, 29:63-81.
22. Søndergaard M., Bruun L., Lauridsen T., Jeppesen E., Madsen T.V. The impact of waterfowl on submerged macrophytes: in situ experiments in a shallow eutrophic lake. Aquat. Bot. 1996, 53:73-84.
23. Spence D.H.N. Factors controlling the distribution of freshwater macrophytes with particular reference to the lochs of Scotland. J. Ecol. 1967, 55:147-170.
24. Spence D.H.N. The zonation of plants in freshwater lakes. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1982, 12:37-125.
25. Steinberg C.E.W. Ecology of Humic Substances in Freshwaters: Determinants from Geochemistry to Ecological Niches 2003, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.
26. Szmeja J. An individual's status in populations of isoetid species. Aquat. Bot. 1994, 48:203-224.
27. Szmeja J. Dynamics of the abundance and spatial organisation of isoetid populations in an oligotrophic lake. Aquat. Bot. 1994, 49:19-32.
28. Szmeja J. Changes in the aquatic moss Sphagnum denticulatum Brid population abundance in a softwater lake over a period of three years. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2010, 79:167-173.
29. Szmeja J., Bociag K., Merdalski M. Effect of light competition with filamentous algae on the population dynamics development of the moss species Warnstorfia exannulata in a softwater lake. Pol. J. Ecol. 2010, 58:221-230.
30. Ter Braak C.J.F., Smilauer P. CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination 1998, Microcomputer Power, New York.
31. Ter Braak C.J.F., Smilauer P. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5) 2002, Microcomputer Power, USA, Ithaca, NY.
32. Tipping E. Cation Binding by Humic Substances 2002, Cambridge University Press, New York.
33. Van den Berg M.S., Joosse W., Coops H. A statistical model predicting the occurrence and dynamics of submerged macrophytes in shallow lakes in the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 2003, 506-509:611-623.
34. Wetzel R.G. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems 2001, Academic Press, San Diego/San Francisco/New York/Boston/London/Sydney/Tokyo.