Optimization of cone beam CT exposure for pre-surgical evaluation of the implant site

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 70-74

  Dawood, A ^a,b   Brown, J ^c   Sauret Jackson, V ^a   Purkayastha, S ^a  

^a Cavendish Imaging   (United Kingdom)

^b Dawood and Tanner Dental Practice   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Dental implant; Radiation dose; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; METHODOLOGY; NOSE CAVITY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; NASAL CAVITY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84855264144     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/16421849     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Dawood A, Patel S, Brown J. Cone beam CT in dental practice. Br Dent J 2009; 207: 23-28.
2. Sur J, Seki K, Koizumi H, Nakajima K, Okano T. Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110: e29-33.
3. Eggers G, Klein J, Welzel T, Muhling J. Geometric accuracy of digital volume tomography and conventional computed tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 46: 639-644.
4. Mischkowski A, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Brochhagen H, Keeve E, et al. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 551-559.
5. Lofthag-Hansen S, Thilander-Klang A, Ekestubbe A, Helmrot E, Gröndahl K. Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 72-79.
6. Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MAG. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 268-273.
7. Loubele M, Van Assche N, Carpentier Maes F, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, Suetens P. Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 512-518.
8. Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, Tsiklakis K, Whaites E. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 187-195.
9. SEDENTEXCT guideline development panel. Radiation protection: cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Provisional guidelines (v 1.1) May 2009. Available from: www. sedentexct.eu
10. HPA working party on dental cone beam CT equipment.Guidance on the safe use of dental cone beam CT (computed tomography) equipment. HPA-CRCE-010 2010 Nov. Available from: www.hpa.org.uk
11. Sanna A, Molly L, van Steenberghe D. Immediately loaded CAD-CAM manufactured fixed complete dentures using flapless implant placement procedures: a cohort study of consecutive patients. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97: 331-339.
12. Dawood A, Purkayastha S, Patel S, MacKillop F, Tanner S. Microtechnologies in implant and restorative dentistry: a stroll through a digital dental landscape. Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineering. J Engineering in Medicine 2010; 224: 789-796.
13. Liang X, Lambrichts I, Sun Y, Denis K, Hassan B, Li L, et al. A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: 270-274.
14. Lofthag-Hansen S, Gröndahl K, Ekestubbe A. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11: 246-255.