Shrinkage evaluation of heavyweight and lightweight polypropylene meshes in inguinal hernia repair: A randomized controlled trial

Hernia

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 629-634

  Silvestre, A C ^a   De Mathia, G B ^a   Fagundes, D J ^b   Medeiros, L R ^c   Rosa, M I ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE DO EXTREMO SUL CATARINENSE   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Inguinal hernia; Mesh; Randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

POLYPROPYLENE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; HEAVYWEIGHT MESH; HERNIOPLASTY; HUMAN; INGUINAL HERNIA; LIGHTWEIGHT MESH; MALE; MESH SHRINKAGE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ADULT; HERNIA, INGUINAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMANS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MIDDLE AGED; POLYPROPYLENES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SURGICAL MESH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855257560     PISSN: 12654906     EISSN: 12489204     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-011-0853-6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. P Primatesta MJ Goldacre 1996 Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality Int J Epidemiol 25 835 839 8921464 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FnvFOmsQ%3D%3D 10.1093/ije/25.4.835 (Pubitemid 26290069)
2. M Bay-Nielsen H Kehlet L Strand, et al. 2001 Quality assessment of 26, 304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark; a prospective nationwide study Lancet 358 1124 1128 11597665 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrltFOmtQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06251-1 (Pubitemid 32971844)
3. BJ Lammers HJ Meyer HG Huber, et al. 2001 Developments in inguinal hernia based on newly introduced intervention techniques in the North Rhine district Chirurg 72 448 452 11357540 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ms1Oluw%3D%3D 10.1007/s001040051330 (Pubitemid 33681971)
4. EH Collaboration 2000 Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials Br J Surg 87 854 859 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01539.x (Pubitemid 30487685)
5. A Grant 2002 EU Hernia Trialist collaboration. Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia: meta-analysis of randomized trials based on individual patient data Hernia 6 130 136 12209302 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vltlGhsQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s10029-002-0073-1
6. D Weyhe O Belyaev C Muller Meurer, et al. 2007 Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes-a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature World J Surg 31 234 244 17180568 10.1007/s00268-006-0123-4 (Pubitemid 46089571)
7. B Klosterhalfen U Klinge B Hermanns, et al. 2000 Pathology of traditional surgical nets for hernia repair after long-term implantation in humans Chirurg 71 43 51 10663001 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ivFymug%3D%3D
8. D Akolekar S Kumar LR Khan, et al. 2008 Comparison of recurrence with lightweight composite polypropylene mesh and heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an audit of 1, 232 repairs Hernia 12 39 43 17851728 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c%2Fpt1KhsA%3D%3D 10.1007/s10029-007- 0275-7 (Pubitemid 351234437)
9. ZT Awad V Puri K LeBlanc, et al. 2005 Mechanisms of ventral hernia recurrence after mesh repair and a new proposed classification J Am Coll Surg 201 132 140 15978454 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.035 (Pubitemid 40840574)
10. LM Nyhus R Pollack CT Bruceck 1988 The preperitoneal approach and prosthetic buttress repair for recurrent hernia Ann Surg 208 733 737 3196094 1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2FmtFWqug%3D%3D 10.1097/00000658-198812000-00010 (Pubitemid 19002513)
11. C Schug-Pass C Tamme F Sommerer, et al. 2008 A lightweight, partially absorbable mesh (Ultrapro) for endoscopic hernia repair: experimental biocompatibility results obtained with a porcine model Surg Endosc 22 1100 1106 17963002 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3kvVCqug%3D%3D 10.1007/s00464-007-9585-1 (Pubitemid 351534083)
12. D Moher KF Schulz D Altman 2001 The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials JAMA 285 1987 1991 11308435 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3kvFagug%3D%3D 10.1001/jama.285.15.1987 (Pubitemid 32366951)
13. KF Schulz G Douglas DG Altman, et al. 2010 CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials J Clin Epidemiol 63 834 840 20346629 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.005
14. PK Amid 1997 Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery Hernia 1 15 21 10.1007/BF02426382
15. U Klinge B Klosterhalfen M Muller, et al. 1998 Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs Eur J Surg 164 965 969 10029393 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7ltFymsw%3D%3D 10.1080/110241598750005156 (Pubitemid 29057881)
16. G Welty U Klinge B Klosterhalfen, et al. 2001 Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes Hernia 5 142 147 11759800 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fjt1egsA%3D%3D 10.1007/s100290100017 (Pubitemid 33039809)
17. SA Kapiris WA Brough CM Royston, et al. 2001 Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017 patients Surg Endosc 15 972 975 11605111 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrlvVCrsw%3D%3D 10.1007/s004640080090 (Pubitemid 32852852)
18. JM Anderson KM Miller 1984 Biomaterial, biocompatibility and the macrophage Biomaterials 5 5 10 6375747 1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXhtVWhs7c%3D 10.1016/0142-9612(84)90060-7 (Pubitemid 14151097)
19. RS Bhardwaj U Henze B Klein 1977 Monocyte-biomaterial interaction inducing phenotypic dynamics of monocytes: a possible role of monocyte subsets in biocompatibility J Mater Sci Mater Med 8 737 742 10.1023/A:1018552326808
20. Dirk Weyhe Inge Schmitz Orlin Belyaev, et al. 2006 Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less Biol Response 8 1586 1591
21. C Tamme N Garde A Klingler, et al. 2005 Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty with titanium-coated lightweight polypropylene mesh: early results Surg Endosc 19 1125 1129 16021367 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrlvVOiug%3D%3D 10.1007/s00464-004-8219-0 (Pubitemid 41494833)
22. K Junge R Rosch U Klinge, et al. 2006 Risk factors related to recurrence in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis Hernia 10 309 315 16721504 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28vnt12iug%3D%3D 10.1007/s10029-006-0096-0 (Pubitemid 44203404)
23. S Bringman J Conze D Cuccurullo, et al. 2010 Hernia repair: the search for ideal meshes Hernia 14 81 87 20012333 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c%2FnsFeqtQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s10029-009-0587-x
24. RG Holzheimer 2007 Low recurrence rate in hernia repair-results in 300 patients with open mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia Eur J Med Res 12 1 5 17363351 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s7mt1eqtQ%3D%3D
25. K Junge R Rosch CJ Krones, et al. 2005 Influence of polyglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) supplementation on the biocompatibility of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair Hernia 9 212 217 15703859 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FmsVGmtw%3D%3D 10.1007/s10029-004-0315-5 (Pubitemid 43192937)