Partnering to harmonize IRBs for community-engaged research to reduce health disparities

Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

Volumn 22, Issue 4 SUPPL., 2011, Pages 8-15

  Hammatt, Zoë H ^a   Nishitani, Junko ^b   Heslin, Kevin C ^c   Theresa Perry, M ^e   Szetela, Carolyn ^d   Jones, Loretta ^b   Williams, Pluscedia ^b   Antoine Lavigne, Donna ^e   Forge, Nell G ^b   Norris, Keith C ^b  

^a University of Hawaii William S Richardson School of Law   (United States)

^b DREW UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Veterans Health Administration Emergency Management Evaluation Center   (United States)

^d MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^e JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community academic partnerships; Health disparities; Institutional review boards; Reliance agreement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855251048     PISSN: 10492089     EISSN: 15486869     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0157     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Menikoff J. The paradoxical problem with multiple-IRB review. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct. 21; 363(17):1591-3.
2. Edgar H, Rothman DJ. The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation. Milbank Q. 1995;73(4):489-506.
3. Christian MC, Goldberg JL, Killen J, et al. A central institutional review board for multi-institutional trials. N Engl J Med. 2002 May 2; 346(18):1405-8. (Pubitemid 34754617)
4. Lind SE. The institutional review board: an evolving ethics committee. J Clin Ethics. 1992 Winter; 3(4):278-82.
5. Moreno JD. IRBs under the microscope. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998 Sep; 8(3):329-37. (Pubitemid 128445241)
6. National Center for Research Resources, Clinical and Translational Science Awards. Regulatory Knowledge and Support Program. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, 2010.
7. Institutional Review Boards. A time for reform. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1998.
8. Gelijns AC, Thier SO. Medical innovation and institutional interdependence: rethinking university-industry connections. JAMA. 2002 Jan 2; 287(1):72-7. (Pubitemid 34251678)
9. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, Williams MV, et al. Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Sep; 14(9):537-46. (Pubitemid 29441632)
10. Gifford AL, Cunningham WE, Heslin KC, et al. Participation in research and access to experimental treatments by HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002 May 2; 346(18):1373-82. (Pubitemid 34754611)
11. Task Force on Financial Interests in Human Subjects Research. Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2001.
12. Wolf LE, Croughan M, Lo B. The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research. Med Care. 2002 Jun; 40(6):521-9.
13. Sirotin N, Wolf LE, Pollack LM, et al. IRBs and ethically challenging protocols: views of IRB chairs about useful resources. IRB. 2010 Sep-Oct; 32(5):10-19.