The politics of marginality in wallowa county, Oregon: Contesting the production of landscapes of consumption

Journal of Rural Studies

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 30-37

  Abrams, Jesse B ^a   Gosnell, Hannah ^b  

^a WHITMAN COLLEGE   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Governance; Land use policy; Legitimacy; Rural gentrification; Rural restructuring

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; AMENITY; GENTRIFICATION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LAND USE PLANNING; RURAL DEVELOPMENT;

OREGON; UNITED STATES; WALLOWA COUNTY;

EID: 84855216802     PISSN: 07430167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abbott C., Howe D., Adler S. Planning the Oregon Way: A Twenty-year Evaluation 1994, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR.
2. Abrams, J., 2011. Restructuring of Land and Community in the Remote Rural West: The Case of Wallowa County, Oregon. Doctoral Dissertation, Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
3. Baker M., Kusel J. Community Forestry: Learning from the Past, Crafting the Future 2003, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
4. Bliss J.C., Martin A.J. Identity and private forest management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 1988, 1:365-376.
5. Bromley D.W. Rousseau's revenge: the demise of the freehold estate. Who Owns America? Social Conflict over Property Rights 1998, 19-28. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. H.M. Jacobs (Ed.).
6. Bunce M. The Countryside Ideal: Anglo-American Images of Landscape 1994, Routledge, New York, NY.
7. Bunce M. Thirty years of farmland preservation in North America: discourses and ideologies of a movement. J.Rural Stud. 1998, 14:233-247.
8. Burton R.J.F. Seeing through the 'good farmer's' eyes: towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of 'productivist' behaviour. Sociol. Ruralis 2004, 44:195-215.
9. Cadieux K.V. Competing discourses of nature in exurbia. GeoJournal 2009, 76:341-363.
10. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis 2006, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
11. Christoffersen N. Wallowa Resources: gaining access and adding value to natural resources on public lands. Natural Resources as Community Assets: Lessons from Two Continents 2005, 147-175. Sand County Foundation, Madison, WI. B. Child, M.W. Lyman (Eds.).
12. Dwyer J.F., Childs G.M. Movement of people across the landscape: a blurring of distinctions between areas, interests, and issues affecting natural resource management. Landscape Urban Plan. 2004, 69:153-164.
13. Feldman T.D., Jonas A.E.G. Sage scrub revolution? Property rights, political fragmentation, and conservation planning in Southern California under the Endangered Species Act. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2000, 90:256-292.
14. Flynn A., Lowe P. Local politics and rural restructuring: the case of the contested countryside. Agricultural Restructuring and Rural Change in Europe 1994, 247-259. Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. D. Symes, A.J. Jansen (Eds.).
15. Freyfogle E.T. The Land We Share: Private Property and the Common Good 2003, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
16. Gosnell H., Abrams J. Amenity migration: diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal 2011, 76:303-322.
17. Gosnell H., Kline J.D., Chrostek G., Duncan J. Is Oregon's land use planning program conserving forest and farm land? A review of the evidence. Land Use Policy 2011, 28:185-192.
18. Green G.P., Marcouiller D., Deller S., Erkkila D., Sumathi N.R. Local dependency, land use attitudes, and economic development: comparisons between seasonal and permanent residents. Rural Sociol. 1996, 61:427-445.
19. Groll B.J. Oregon Comprehensive Land Use Planning 1982, Atkinson Graduate School of Management, Willamette University, Salem, OR.
20. Gurran N., Blakely E.J., Squires C. Governance responses to rapid growth in environmentally sensitive areas of coastal Australia. Coast. Manage. 2007, 35:445-465.
21. Gustafson G.C., Daniels T.L., Shirack R.P. The Oregon land use act: implications for farmland and open space protection. J.Am. Plan. Assoc. 1982, 365-373.
22. Hibbard M., Lurie S. Saving land but losing ground: challenges to community planning in the era of participation. J.Plan. Educ. Res. 2000, 20:187-195.
23. Holloway L. Smallholding, hobby farming, and commercial farming: ethical identities and the production of farming spaces. Environ. Plan. A 2002, 34:2055-2070.
24. Holmes J. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: gaps in the research agenda. J.Rural Stud. 2006, 22:142-160.
25. Hunnicut D.J. Oregon land-use regulation and ballot measure 37: Newton's third law at work. Environ. Law 2006, 36:25-52.
26. Huntsinger L., Hopkinson P. Viewpoint: Sustaining rangeland landscapes: a social and ecological process. J.Range Manage. 1996, 49:167-173.
27. Hurley P.T., Walker P.A. Whose vision? conspiracy theory and land-use planning in Nevada County, California. Environ. Plan. A 2004, 36:1529-1547.
28. Jackson P.L., Kuhlken R. ARediscovered Frontier: Land Use and Resource Issues in the New West 2006, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
29. Klepeis P., Gill N., Chisholm L. Emerging amenity landscapes: invasive weeds and land subdivision in rural Australia. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:380-392.
30. Knaap G. Land use politics in Oregon. Planning the Oregon Way: A Twenty-year Evaluation 1994, 3-23. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR. C. Abbott, D. Howe, S. Adler (Eds.).
31. Krishnaswamy A.K. The national community forestry center: an experiment in institutionalizing community forestry in the United States. Communities and Forests: Where People Meet the Land 2005, 193-209. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis. R.G. Lee, D.R. Field (Eds.).
32. Liffmann R.H., Huntsinger L., Forero L.C. To ranch or not to ranch: home on the urban range?. J.Range Manage. 2000, 53:362-370.
33. Lockie S., Lawrence G., Cheshire L. Reconfiguring rural resource governance: the legacy of neo-liberalism in Australia. Handbook of Rural Studies 2006, 29-43. Sage, London. P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P.H. Mooney (Eds.).
34. Lowe P., Murdoch J., Marsden T., Munton R., Flynn A. Regulating the new rural spaces: the uneven development of land. J.Rural Stud. 1993, 9:205-222.
35. Marsden T., Murdoch J., Flynn A. Regulating land development: local market structures and structured markets. Rural Sociol. 1993, 58:599-625.
36. Marsden T. New rural territories: regulating the differentiated rural spaces. J.Rural Stud. 1998, 14:107-117.
37. Marsden T. Rural futures: the consumption countryside and its regulation. Sociol. Ruralis 1999, 39:501-520.
38. McCarthy J. Devolution in the woods: community forestry as hybrid neoliberalism. Environ. Plan. A 2005, 37:995-1014.
39. Murdoch J., Marsden T. Reconstituting Rurality: Class, Community and Power in the Development Process 1994, UCL Press, London.
40. Murdoch J., Lowe P., Ward N., Marsden T. The Differentiated Countryside 2003, Routledge, London.
41. Nelson P.B. Rural restructuring in the American West: land use, family and class discourses. J.Rural Stud. 2001, 17:395-407.
42. Otterstrom S.M., Shumway J.M. Deserts and oases: the continuing concentration of population in the American Mountain West. J.Rural Stud. 2003, 19:445-462.
43. Pease J.R. Oregon rural land use: policy and practices. Planning the Oregon Way: A Twenty-year Evaluation 1994, 163-188. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR. C. Abbott, D. Howe, S. Adler (Eds.).
44. Pincetl S.S. The politics of growth control: struggles in Pasadena, California. Urban Geogr. 1992, 13:450-467.
45. Power T. Lost Landscapes and Failed Economies: The Search for a Value of Place 1996, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
46. Robbins W.G. The place we call home: a history of land-use planning in Oregon. Or. Humanities 2006, 14-19.
47. Shucksmith M. Farm household behaviour and the transition to post-productivism. J.Agric. Econ. 1993, 44:466-478.
48. Slavin M.I. Irreconcilable differences: economic development and land use planning in Oregon. Planning the Oregon Way: A Twenty-year Evaluation 1994, 71-86. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR. C. Abbott, D. Howe, S. Adler (Eds.).
49. Stanley K.G., Marsden T.K., Milbourne P. Governance, rurality, and nature: exploring emerging discourses of state forestry in Britain. Environ. Plan. C 2005, 23:679-695.
50. Veblen T. Absentee Ownership and Business Enterprise in Recent Times: The Case of America 1923, B.W. Huebsch, New York.
51. Vias A.C., Nelson P.B. Changing livelihoods in rural America. Population Change and Rural Society 2006, 75-102. Springer, Dordrecht. W.A. Kandel, D.L. Brown (Eds.).
52. Waage, S.A., 2000. (Re) Claiming the Watershed: Property Lines, Treaty Rights, and Collaborative Natural Resource Management Planning in Rural Oregon. Doctoral dissertation, Wildland Resource Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
53. Walker P.A., Fortmann L. Whose landscape? a political ecology of the 'exurban' Sierra. Cult. Geographies 2003, 10:469-491.
54. Walker P.A., Hurley P.T. Planning Paradise: Politics and Visioning of Land Use in Oregon 2011, University of Arizona Press, Tuscon.
55. Walker P.A., Marvin S.J., Fortmann L.P. Landscape changes in Nevada County reflect social and ecological transitions. Calif. Agric. 2003, 57:115-121.
56. Wallowa County Economic Action Team Rural Development Assistance Team Report 2007, (accessed 10.03.11.). http://www.wallowacountychamber.com/chamber/pdf_docs/RDAT%20Team%20Report.pdf.
57. Warner M.E. Competition, cooperation, and local governance. Challenges for Rural America in the Twenty-first Century 2003, 252-261. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA. D.L. Brown, L.E. Swanson (Eds.).
58. Woods M. Advocating rurality? The repositioning of rural local government. J.Rural Stud. 1998, 14:13-26.
59. Young T. Democracy or expertise? objectivity as an elusive ideal in the resolution of a Vermont land use dispute. GeoJournal 2011, 76:401-415.