Protein subcellular localization of fluorescence imagery using spatial and transform domain features

Bioinformatics

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 91-97

  Tahir, Muhammad ^a   Khan, Asifullah ^a   Majid, Abdul ^a  

^a PAKISTAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCES   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HELA CELL; HUMAN; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

HELA CELLS; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84855185013     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr624     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Boland, M. V. et al. (1998) Automated recognition of patterns characteristic of subcellular structures in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytometry, 33, 366-375.
2. Boland, M. V. and Murphy, R. F. (2001) Aneural network classifier capable of recognizing the patterns of all major subcellular structures in fluorescence microscope images of HeLa cells. Bioinformatics, 17, 1213-1223.
3. Chebira, A. et al. (2007) A multiresolution approach to automated classification of protein subcellular location images. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 210.
4. Gunn, S. R. (1998) SupportVector Machines for Classification and Regression. Technical Report. Faculty of Engineering, Science and Mathematics, School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton.
5. Hamilton, N. A. et al. (2006) Automated Sub-Cellular Phenotype Classification: An Introduction and Recent Results. The 2006 Workshop on Intelligent Systems for Bioinformatics (WISB 2006). Australian Computer Society, Inc., Hobart, Australia, pp. 67-72.
6. Hamilton, N. A. et al. (2007) Fast automated cell phenotype image classification. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 110.
7. Haralick, R. M. (1979) Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture. In Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 67. IEEE, pp. 786-804.
8. Hayat, M. and Khan, A. (2011) Predicting membrane protein types by fusing composite protein sequence features into pseudo amino acid composition. J. Theor. Biol., 271, 10-17.
9. Hu, Y. and Murphy, R. F. (2004) Automated interpretation of subcellular patterns from immunofluorescence microscopy. J. Immunol. Methods, 290, 93-105.
10. Khan, A. et al. (2008) Machine learning based adaptive watermark decoding in view of an anticipated attack. Patt. Recognit., 41, 2594-2610.
11. Khan, A. et al. (2011) CE-PLoc: an ensemble classifier for predicting protein subcellular locations by fusing different modes of Pseudo amino acid composition. Comput. Biol. Chem., 35, 218-229.
12. Lin, C. -C. et al. (2007) Boosting multiclass learning with repeating codes and weak detectors for protein subcellular localization. Bioinformatics, 23, 3374-3381.
13. Majid, A. et al. (2006) Combining support vector machines using genetic programming. Int. J. Hybrid Intell. Syst., 3, 109-125.
14. Murphy, R. F. et al. (2000) Towards a systematics for protein subcellular location: quantitative description of protein localization patterns and automated analysis of fluorescence microscope images. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. AAAI Press, La Jolla/San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 251-259.
15. Murphy, R. F. et al. (2002) Robust classification of subcellular location patterns in fluorescence microscope images. In Proceedings of the 2002 12th IEEE International Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing. IEEE, pp. 67-76.
16. Murphy, R. F. et al. (2003) Robust numerical features for description and classification of subcellular location patterns in fluorescence microscope images. J. VLSI Signal Process., 35, 311-321.
17. Nanni, L. et al. (2009) Automated cell phenotype image classification combining different methods. In Proceeding of theWorkshop on Automated Interpretation and Modeling of Cell Images (ICML-UAI-COLT 2009). McGill University, Montreal QC, Canada.
18. Nanni, L. and Lumini, A. (2008) A reliable method for cell phenotype image classification. Art. Intell. Med., 43, 87-97.
19. Nanni, L. et al. (2010a) Novel features for automated cell phenotype image classification. Adv. Comput. Biol. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 680, 207-213.
20. Nanni, L. et al. (2010b) Selecting the best performing rotation invariant patterns in local binary/ternary patterns. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing, Computer Vision, & Pattern Recognition (IPCV'10). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, pp. 369-375.
21. Nanni, L. et al. (2010c) Fusion of systems for automated cell phenotype image classification. Exp. Syst. Appl., 37, 1556-1562.
22. Ojala, T. et al. (1996) Acomparative study of texture measures with classification based on feature distribution. Patt. Recognit., 29, 51-59.
23. Srinivasa, G. et al. (2006) Adaptive multiresolution techniques for subcellular protein location classification. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics Speech Signal Process, 5, 14-19.
24. Tan, X. and Triggs, B. (2007) Enhanced local texture feature sets for face recognition under difficult lighting conditions. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Analysis and Modeling of Faces and Gestures. Springer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 168-182.