Contraception in primary care - Embracing the Institute of Medicine challenge

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 365, Issue 25, 2011, Pages 2438-2439

  Pace, Lydia E ^a   Cohen, Laura ^a   Schwarz, E Bimla ^b  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTRACEPTION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FAMILY PLANNING; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICE; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; LETTER; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY; WOMEN'S HEALTH; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; NOTE; PREGNANCY; UNWANTED PREGNANCY;

CONTRACEPTION; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, UNWANTED;

EID: 84855174342     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1109240     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Institute of Medicine. Clinical preventive services for women: closing the gaps. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011.
2. Cleland K, Peipert JF, Westhoff C, Spear S, Trussell J. Family planning as a cost-saving preventive health service. N Engl J Med 2011;364(18):e37.
3. Steinauer J, LaRochelle F, Rowh M, Backus L, Sandahl Y, Foster A. First impressions: what are preclinical medical students in the US and Canada learning about sexual and reproductive health? Contraception 2009;80:74-80.
4. Eisenberg DL, Stika C, Desai A, Baker D, Yost KJ. Providing contraception for women taking potentially teratogenic medications: a survey of internal medicine physicians' knowledge, attitudes and barriers. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:291-7.
5. Kavanaugh ML, Jerman J, Hubacher D, Kost K, Finer LB. Characteristics of women in the United States who use long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:1349-57.