Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 365, Issue 24, 2011, Pages 2338-2339

  Koppel, Ross ^a   Majumdar, Sumit R ^b   Soumerai, Stephen B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIABETES CARE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; NOTE;

DIABETES MELLITUS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84855173837     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1111722     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Cebul RD, Love TE, Jain AK, Hebert CJ. Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care. N Engl J Med 2011;365:825-33.
2. Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, et al. The Impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med 2011;8(1):e1000387.
3. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.
4. Report to the President: realizing the full potential of health information technology to improve healthcare for Americans: the path forward. Washington, DC: President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, December 2010 (http://www .whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ pcast-health-itreport. pdf).
5. Greenhalgh T, Potts HWW, Wong G, Bark P, Singlehurst D. Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Q 2009;87:729-88.
6. Institute of Medicine. Health IT and patient safety: building safer systems for better care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=13269).