Progress in catalytic membrane reactors for high purity hydrogen production

Wuji Cailiao Xuebao/Journal of Inorganic Materials

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1233-1243

  Yan, Yun Fei ^a   Zhang, Li ^a   Li, Li Xian ^a   Tang, Qiang ^a  

^a CHONGQING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Catalytic; Hydrogen; Membrane; Reactor; Review; Separation

Indexed keywords

CATALYTIC; CATALYTIC MEMBRANE; CATALYTIC MEMBRANE REACTORS; CATALYTIC REACTIONS; CATALYTIC REACTOR; CATALYTIC TECHNOLOGY; DUAL FUNCTION; EXISTING PROBLEMS; FUEL CELL TECHNOLOGIES; HIGH PURITY; INORGANIC MEMBRANES; LATEST DEVELOPMENT; LOW COSTS; MEMBRANE REACTOR; PREPARATION TECHNIQUE; REACTOR; SCALE METHOD;

BIOREACTORS; CATALYSIS; FUEL CELLS; HYDROGEN; MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY; MEMBRANES; OXYGEN PERMEABLE MEMBRANES; REVIEWS; SEPARATION;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

EID: 84855161096     PISSN: 1000324X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1077.2011.01233     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Cheng Y S, Pea MA, Fierro J L, et al. Performance of alumina, zeolite, palladium, Pd-Ag alloy membranes for hydrogen separation from towngas mixture. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 204(1/2): 329-340.
2. Klaiber T. Fuel cells for transport: can the promise be fulfilled? Technical requirements and demands from customers. J. Power Sources, 1996, 61(1/2): 61-69.
3. Suurs RAA, Hekkert MP, Smits REHM. Understanding the build-up of a technological innovation system around hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(24): 9639-9654.
4. 2010, 46(6): 16-20.
5. 2007, 32(4): 59-64.
6. 2005(6): 367-370.
7. Wood B J, Wise H. Dehydrogenation of cyclohexane on a hydrogenporous membrane. J. Catal., 1968, 11(1): 30-34.
8. Gryaznov V M, Smirnov V S. The reactions of hydrogenations on membrane catalysts. Russ. Chem. Rev., 1974, 43(10): 821-834.
9. Chen Y, Wang Y, Xu H, et al. Hydrogen production of membrane reformer for methane steam reforming near practical working conditions. J. Memb. Sci., 2008, 32(2): 453-459.
10. 2007, 27(6): 82-88.
11. 2007.
12. 1999.
13. CHENG Yun-Fei, et al. Rare Metal Mat. Eng., 2008, 37(12): 2069-2074.
14. Keizer K, Bruggraaf A J. Porous ceramic materials membranes in membrane applications. Sci. Ceram., 1988, 14: 83-93.
15. Bonecamp B C. Preparation of asymmetric ceramic membrane supports by dip-casting. Membr. Sci. Technol., 1996, 4: 141-225.
16. Iglesia O de la, Pedemera M, Mallada R, et al. Synthesis and characterization of MCM-48 tubular membranes. J. Memb. Sci., 2006, 280(1/2): 867-875.
17. 2002.
18. 2007.
19. Wu S Q, Gallot J E, Bousmina M, et al. Zeolite containing catalytic membrane as interphase contactor. Catal. Today, 2000, 56(1/2/3): 113-129.
20. Zaspalis V T, Praag W V, Keizer K, et al. Reactions of methanol over catalytically active alumina membranes. Appl. Catal., 1991, 74(2): 205-222.
21. Caro J, Caspary K J, Hame C, et al. Catalytic membrane reactors for partial oxidation using perovskite hollow fiber membranes and for partial hydrogenation using a catalytic membrane contactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2007, 46(8): 2286-2294.
22. Jiang H, Wang H H, Werth S, et al. Simultaneous production of hydrogen and synthesis gas by combining water splitting with partial oxidation of methane in a hollow-fiber membrane reactor. Angew. Chem., 2008, 47(48): 9341-9344.
23. Shao Z P, Dong H, Xiong G X, et al. Performance of a mixed-conducting ceramic membrane reactor with high oxygen permeability for methane conversion. J. Membr. Sci., 2001, 183(2): 181-192.
24. 2006.
25. Gellings P J, Bouwmeester H J M. The CRC Handbook of Solid State Electrochemistry. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1997: 481-553.
26. ZHU Xue-Feng, et al. Chinese J. Catal., 2009, 30(8): 801-816.
27. 2005, 21(4): 345-352.
28. Dong H, Shao Z P, Xiong G X, et al. Investigation on POM reaction in a new pervskite membrane reactor. Catal. Today, 2001, 67(1/2/3): 3-13.
29. Dong X L, Liu Z K, Jin W Q, et al. A self-catalytic mixed-conducting membrane reactor for effective production of hydrogen from methane. J. Power Sources, 2008, 185(8): 1340-1347.
30. Teraoka Y, Zhang H, Furukawa S, et al. Oxygen permeation through perovskite-type oxides. Chem. Lett., 1985, 167(11): 1743-1746.
31. 3 on mixed conductivity and oxygen permeability. Solid State Inoics, 1991, 48(3/4): 207-212.
32. 2000, 45(3): 273-276.
33. 3-δ membrane reactor. Catal. Today, 2003, 82(1-4): 157-166.
34. 3-δ ceramic membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 2002, 195(2): 277-287.
35. x asymmetric membranes by modifying support-layer porous structure. Mater. Lett., 2005, 59(11): 1356-1360.
36. 3. Solid State Ionics, 2003, 158(3/4): 287-296.
37. Balachandran U, Dusek J T, Maiya P S, et al. Ceramic membrane reactor for converting methane to syngas. Catal. Today, 1997, 36(3): 265-272.
38. Wang H H, Yang W S, Cong Y, et al. Structure and oxygen permeability of a dual-phase membrane. J. Membr. Sci., 2003, 224(1/2): 107-115.
39. Veser G, Wright A, Caretta R. On the oxidation reduction kinetics of palladium. Catal. Lett., 1999, 58(4): 199-206.
40. Hulbert R C, Konecny J O. Diffusion of hydrogen through palladium. J. Chem. Phys., 1961, 34(2): 655-658.
41. ZHANG Xiao-Liang, et al. Chinese J. Catal., 2010, 31(8): 1049-1053.
42. Galuszka J, Pandey R N, Ahmed S. Methane conversion to syngas in a palladium membrane reactor. Catal. Today, 1998, 46(2/3): 83-89.
43. Criscuoli A, Basile A, Drioli E. An economic feasibility study for water gas shift membrane reactor. J. Membr. Sci., 2001, 181(1): 21-27.
44. Tosti S, Basile A, Chiappetta G, et al. Pd-Ag membrane reactors for water gas shift reaction. Chem. Eng., 2003, 93(1): 23-30.
45. Dittmeyer R, Caro J. Catalytic Membrane Reactor-Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2008.
46. Tong J H, Matsumura Y. Effect of catalytic activity on methane steam reforming in hydrogen permeable membrane reactor. Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 2005, 286(2): 226-231.
47. Soldatov A P, Tsodikov M V, Bichkov V Y, et al. Teplyakov From micro- to nano-size catalytic membrane hydrogenation reactors with accumulated hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(1): 1264-1270.
48. 2 production. J. Membr. Sci., 2011, 368(1/2): 116-123.
49. De Falco M, Di Paola L, Marrelli L, et al. Simulation of large-scale membrane reformers by a two-dimensional model. Chem. Eng. J., 2007, 128(2/3): 115-125.
50. Teixeira M, Madeira L M, Sousa J M, et al. Modeling of a catalytic membrane reactor for CO removal from hydrogen streams-a theoretical study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(20): 11505-11513.
51. Tugnoli A, Landucci G, Cozzani V. Sustainability assessment of hydrogen production by steam reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(16): 4345-4357.
52. Gallucci F, Paturzo L, Fama A, et al. Experimental study of the methane steam reforming in a dense Pd/Ag membrane reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2004, 43(4): 928-933.
53. 2 membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 2008, 316(1/2): 53-62.
54. Cheng S H, Chen H J, Chang H, et al. Multi-objective optimization for two catalytic membrane reactors-methanol synthesis and hydrogen production. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2008, 63(6): 1428-1437.
55. Galluccia F, Basile A, Tostib S, et al. Methanol and ethanol steam reforming in membrane reactors: an experimental study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(9): 1201-1210.
56. Gallucci F, De Falco M, Tosti S, et al. Co-current and counter-current configurations for ethanol steam reforming in a dense Pd-Ag membrane reactor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(21): 6165-6171.
57. Yuab C Y, Leea D W, Parka S J, et al. Study on a catalytic membrane reactor for hydrogen production from ethanol steam reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(7): 2947-2954.
58. Rahimpour M R. Enhancement of hydrogen production in a novel fluidized bed membrane reactor for naphtha reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(5): 2235-2251.
59. Abdollahi M, Yu J, Liu P K T, et al. Hydrogen production from coal-derived syngas using a catalytic membrane reactor based process. J. Membr. Sci., 2010, 363(1/2): 160-169.
60. FENG Dong-Mei, et al. Chinese J. Chem. Eng., 2010, 24(1): 58-63.
61. Jung S H, Kusakabe K, Morooka S, et al. Effects of co-existing hydrocarbons on hydrogen permeation through a palladium membrane. J. Membr. Sci., 2000, 170(1): 53-60.
62. Ali J K, Hasler P, Newson E J, et al. Irreversible poisoning of Pd-Ag membranes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 1994, 19(11): 877-880.
63. Antoniazzi A B, Haasz A A, Stangeby P C. The effect of adsorbed carbon and sulphur on hydrogen permeation through palladium. J. Nucl. Mater., 1989, 162-164(1): 1065-1070.
64. Gallucci F, Chiaravalloti F, Tosti S, et al. The effect of mixture gas on hydrogen permeation through a palladium membrane: experimental study and theoretical approach. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(12): 1837-1845.
65. Hara S, Sakaki K, Itoh N. Decline in hydrogen permeation due to concentration polarization and CO hindrance in a palladium membrane reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1999, 38(12): 4913-4918.
66. Hou K, Hughes R. The effect of mass transfer, competitive adsorption and coking on hydrogen permeation through thin Pd/Ag membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 2002, 206(1/2): 119-130.
67. 2006.
68. Collins J P, Way J D. Catalytic decomposition of ammonia in a membrane reactor. J. Membr. Sci., 1994, 96(3): 259-274.
69. Abashar M E E. Integrated catalytic membrane reactors for decomposition of ammonia. Chem. Eng. Proc., 2002, 41(5): 403-412.
70. Abashar M E E, Al-Sughair Y S, Al-Mutaz I S. Investigation of low temperature decomposition of ammonia using spatially patterned catalytic membrane reactors. Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 2002, 236(1/2): 35-53.
71. García-García F R, Ma Y H, Rodríguez-Ramos I. High purity hydrogen production by low temperature catalytic ammonia decomposition in a multifunctional membrane reactor. Catal. Commun., 2008, 9(3): 482-486.
72. Feng W, Ji P J, Zheng D X, et al. Simulation and thermodynamic analysis of an integrated process with a two-membrane catalytic partial oxidation (CPO) reactor for producing pure hydrogen. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44(24): 9191-9198.
73. Shah M M, Drnevich R F, Balachandran U, et al. Technoeconomic Feasibility Analysis of Hydrogen Production by Integrated Ceramic Membrane System. In Proceedings of the 2001 DOE Hydrogen Program Review, Golden, CO, 2001.
74. Chen Z, Yan Y, Said E S E H. Novel circulating fast fluidised-bed membrane reformer for efficient production of hydrogen from steam reforming of methane. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2003, 58(19): 4335-4349.