Photosynthetic parameters and cut-flower yield of rose 'Eurored' (H.T.) are adversely affected by mild water stress irrespective of substrate composition

Scientia Horticulturae

Volumn 126, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 390-394

  Bolla, Androniki ^a   Voyiatzis, Demetrios ^a   Koukourikou Petridou, Magdalene ^a   Chimonidou, Dora ^b  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources Cyprus   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

Photosynthetic parameters; Rose; Substrate cultivation; Water deficit

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPHYLL; CROP YIELD; CULTIVATION; DICOTYLEDON; GROWTH RATE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; SUBSTRATE; WATER STRESS;

PRUNUS DULCIS;

EID: 84755161465     PISSN: 03044238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.07.034     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barrs H.D., Weatherley P.E. A re-examination of the turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1962, 15:413-428.
2. Brestic M., Cornic G., Fryer M.J., Baker N.R. Does photorespiration protect the photosynthetic apparatus in French bean leaves from photoinhibition during drought stress?. Planta 1995, 196:450-457.
3. Chimonidou D. Yield and quality of Rose 'Madelon' as affected by four irrigation and three shading regimes. Acta Hortic. 1998, 458:95-102.
4. Chimonidou-Pavlidou D. Irrigation and sensitive stages of rose development. Acta Hortic. 1999, 481:393-402.
5. 3 plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Elatostema repens (Lour.) Hall f.). Planta 1989, 177:84-90.
6. Cornic G. Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture-not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5:187-188.
7. Evans J.R., von Caemmerer S. Carbon dioxide diffusion inside leaves. Plant Physiol. 1996, 110:39-346.
8. 3 plants: stomatal and non stomatal limitations revisited. Ann. Bot. 2002, 89:183-189.
9. Gunasekera D., Berkowitz G.A. Use of transgenic plants with Rubisco antisense DNA to evaluate the rate limitation of photosynthesis under water stress. Plant Physiol. 1993, 103:629-635.
10. Heuvelink E., Bakker M., Stanghellini C. Salinity effects on fruit yield in vegetable crops: a simulation study. Acta Hortic. 2003, 609:133-140.
11. Lieth J.H., Burger D.W. Growth of chrysanthemum using an irrigation system controlled by soil moisture tension. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1989, 114:387-392.
12. 3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Ann. Bot. 2002, 89:895-905.
13. Moran R. Formulae for determination of chlorophyll pigments extracted with N,N-dimethylformamine. Plant Physiol. 1982, 69:1376-1381.
14. Neocleous D., Vasilkakis M. Effects of NaCl stress on red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L 'Autumn Bliss'). Sci. Hortic. 2007, 112:282-289.
15. Örgen E., Öquist G. Effects of drought on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and photoinhibition susceptibility in intact willow leaves. Planta 1985, 166:380-388.
16. Percival D.C., Proctor J.T.A., Privé J.P. Gas exchange, stem water potential and leaf orientation of Rubus idaeus L. are influenced by drought stress. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 1998, 73:831-840.
17. Raviv M., Blom T.J. The effect of water availability and quality on photosynthesis and productivity of soilless-grown cut roses. Sci. Hortic. 2001, 88:257-276.
18. Steduto P., Albrizio R., Giorgio P., Sorrentino G. Gas-exchange response and stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to carbon assimilations of sunflower under salinity. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2000, 44:243-255.
19. Williams M.H., Rosenqvist E., Buchhave M. Response of potted miniature roses (Rosa×hybrida) to reduced water availability during production. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 1999, 74:301-308.
20. Wise R.R., Sparow D.H., Ortiz-Lopez A., Ort D.R. Biochemical regulation during the mid-day decline of photosynthesis in field-grown sunflower. Plant Sci. 1991, 74:45-52.