Investigation on the 3 D geometric accuracy and on the image quality (MTF, SNR and NPS) of volume tomography units (CT, CBCT and DVT);Untersuchung zur geometrischen 3-D-Genauigkeit und zur Bildqualität (MTF, SRV und W) von Volumentomografie-Einrichtungen (CT, CBCT und DVT)

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 184, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 24-31

  Blendl, C ^a   Fiebich, M ^b   Voigt, J M ^b   Selbach, M ^a   Uphoff, C ^a  

^a Institute for Media and Imaging Technology   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer Tomography (CT, CBCT); Digital Volume Tomography (DVT); Geometrical 3 D Accuracy; Image Quality (MTF, NPS)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; GEOMETRY; IMAGE QUALITY; KERNEL METHOD; MODULATION TRANSFER FUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; X RAY;

ARTIFACTS; CALIBRATION; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOTHERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84655176386     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281818     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Feldkamp L A., Davis L C., Kress J W. Practical cone-beam algorithm. Optical Society of America 1984
2. The Phantom Laboratory. Catphan 500 and 600 Manual. 2010 18
3. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H et al. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2004 33 83-86
4. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. European Journal of Radiology 2009 71 461-468
5. Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K et al. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003 95 371-377 (Pubitemid 36877346)
6. Schietinger M, Hoffmann J, Heuschmid M et al,. Messung der Dosisexposition bei radiologischen Untersuchungen in der Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie mit hochempfindlichen Thermolumineszenzdosimetern. In: Fix M K. Manser P Mini R (Hrsg) Dreiländertagung Medizinphysik 2007 Tagungsband. Bern, Schweiz 2007 136-137
7. Kyriakou Y, Kolditz D, Langner O et al. Digitale Volumentomographie (DVT) und Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT (MSCT): eine objektive Untersuchung von Dosis und Bildqualität. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011 183 144-153
8. Horn Berthold K P. Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1987 6 629-642
9. Noak M. Verschiedene Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Parameter einer Helmerttransformation. Seminararbeit Technische Universität Berlin 2002
10. Hsieh J. Computed tomography: principles, design, artifacts, and recent advances. 2003 115-116
11. Boedeker K L., Cooper V N., McNitt-Gray M F. Application of the noise power spectrum in modern diagnostic MDCT. Kapitel 1.1 und 1.1.1. 2007
12. Schulze R et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2011 40 265-273