Local/global model order reduction strategy for the simulation of quasi-brittle fracture

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 154-179

  Kerfriden, P ^a   Passieux, J C ^b   Bordas, S P A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive model order reduction (MOR); Local global approach; Newton Krylov solver; Nonlinear fracture mechanics; Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD)

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MODELS; LOCAL/GLOBAL APPROACH; NEWTON/KRYLOV SOLVER; NONLINEAR FRACTURE MECHANICS; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION (POD);

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); FRACTURE MECHANICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

BRITTLE FRACTURE;

EID: 84655163838     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.3234     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. International Journal of Engineering Science 1999; 46: 131-150.
2. Allix O, Corigliano A. Modeling and simulation of crack propagation in mixed-modes interlaminar fracture specimens. International Journal of Fracture 1996; 77: 11-140.
3. Jefferson AD, Bennett T. A model for cementitious composite materials based on micro-mechanical solutions and damage-contact theory. Computers and Structures 2009; 88: 1361-1366.
4. Ladevèze P, Lubineau G. An enhanced mesomodel for laminates based on micromechanics. Composites Science and Technology 2002; 62(4):533-541.
5. Grassl P, Jirásek M. Damage-plastic model for concrete failure. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2006; 43(22-23):7166-7196.
6. Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A geometrically non-linear three-dimensional cohesive crack method for reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2008; 75(16):4740-4758.
7. Fish J, Shek K, Pandheeradi M, Shephard MS. Computational plasticity for composite structures based on mathematical homogenization: theory and practice. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1997; 148: 53-73.
8. 2 multiscale approach for modelling the elastoviscoplastic behaviour of long fibre SiC/Ti composite materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2000; 183(3-4):309-330.
9. Xiao QZ, Karihaloo BL. Two-scale asymptotic homogenisation-based finite element analysis of composite materials. Computational and Experimental Methods in Structures - Multiscale Modeling in Solid Mechanics: Computational Approaches 2010; 3: 43-100.
10. Belytschko T, Loehnert S, Song J-H. Multiscale aggregating discontinuities: a method for circumventing loss of material stability. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2007; 73: 869-894.
11. Nguyen VP, Lloberas-Valls O, Stroeven M, Sluys LJ. Homogenization-based multiscale crack modelling: from micro-diffusive damage to macro-cracks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2010; 200(9-12):1220-1236.
12. Cazès F, Coret M, Combescure A, Gravouil A. A thermodynamic method for the construction of a cohesive law from a nonlocal damage model. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2009; 46(6):1476-1490.
13. Verhoosel CV, Remmers JC, Gutiérrez MA, De Borst R. Computational homogenization for adhesive and cohesive failure in quasi-brittle solids. International Journal for numerical Methods in Engineering 2010; 83(8-9):1155-1179.
14. Barrault M, Maday Y, Nguyen NC, Patera AT. An 'empirical interpolation' method: application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations. Comptes Rendus de Mathématiques 2004; 339(9):667-672.
15. Ryckelynck D. A priori hyperreduction method: an adaptive approach. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 202(1):346-366.
16. Niroomandi S, Alfaro I, Cueto E, Chinesta F. Model order reduction for hyperelastic materials. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2009; 81(9):1180-1206.
17. Verdon N, Allery C, Béghein C, Hamdouni A, Ryckelynck D. Reduced-order modelling for solving linear and non-linear equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 2009; 27(1):43-58.
18. Kerfriden P, Gosselet P, Adhikari S, Bordas S. Bridging proper orthogonal decomposition methods and augmented Newton-Krylov algorithms: an adaptive model order reduction for highly nonlinear mechanical problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2010; 200(5-8):850-866.
19. Antoulas C, Sorensen DC. Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems: an overview. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 2001; 11(5):1093-1121.
20. Rayleigh JWS, Lindsay RB. The Theory of Sound. Dover Publications: Mineola, NY, 1877.
21. Dickens JM, Nakagawa JM, Wittbrodt MJ. A critique of mode acceleration and modal truncation augmentation methods for modal response analysis. Computers and Structures 1997; 62(6):985-998.
22. Craig R, Bampton M. Coupling of substructures for dynamic analysis. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 1968; 6(7):1313-1319.
23. Kerschen G, Peeters M, Golinval JC, Vakakis AF. Nonlinear normal modes, part I: a useful framework for the structural dynamicist. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2009; 23(1):170-194.
24. Sirovich L. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. Part I: coherent structures. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 1987; 45: 561-571.
25. Karhunen K. Über lineare methoden in der wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Series A1, Mathematical Physics 1947; 37: 1-79.
26. Loeve M. Probability Theory, 3rd edn. Van Nostrand: Princeton, NJ, 1963.
27. Nouy A. A generalized spectral decomposition technique to solve a class of linear stochastic partial differential equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2007; 196(45-48):4521-4537.
28. Chinesta F, Ammar A, Cueto E. Recent advances and new challenges in the use of the proper generalized decomposition for solving multidimensional models. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering-State of the Art Reviews 2010; 17(4):327-350.
29. Ladevèze P, Passieux JC, Néron D. The LATIN multiscale computational method and the proper generalized decomposition. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2009; 199(21-22):1287-1296.
30. Nouy A, Le Maître OP. Generalized spectral decomposition method for stochastic non linear problems. Journal of Computational Physics 2008; 228(1):202-235.
31. Galland F, Gravouil A, Malvesin E, Rochette M. A global model reduction approach for 3D fatigue crack growth with confined plasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2010; 200(5-18):699-716.
32. Rixen DJ. A dual Craig-Bampton method for dynamic substructuring. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2004; 168(1-2):383-391.
33. Markovic D, Ibrahimbegovic A, Park KC. Partitioning based reduced order modelling approach for transient analyses of large structures. Engineering Computations 2009; 26: 46-68.
34. Ammar A, Prulière E, Ferec J, Chinesta F, Cueto E. Coupling finite elements and reduced approximation bases. European Journal of Computational Mechanics 2009; 18(5-6):445-463.
35. Ryckelynck D, Chinesta F, Cueto E, Ammar A. On the a priori model reduction: overview and recent developments. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering-State of the Art Reviews 2006; 13(1):91-128.
36. Farhat C, Roux F-X. Implicit parallel processing in structural mechanics. Computational Mechanics Advances 1994; 2: 1-24.
37. Kerfriden P, Allix O, Gosselet P. A three-scale domain decomposition method for the 3D analysis of debonding in laminates. Computational Mechanics 2009; 44(3):343-362.
38. Gendre L, Allix O, Gosselet P, Comte F. Non-intrusive and exact global/local techniques for structural problems with local plasticity. Computational Mechanics 2009; 44(2):233-245.
39. Allix O, Kerfriden P, Gosselet P. A relocalization technique for the multiscale computation of delamination in composite structures. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences 2010; 55(3):271-291.
40. Saad Y. Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 2nd edn. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Philadelphia, PA, 2003.
41. Knoll DA, Keyes DE. Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: a survey of approaches and applications. Journal of Computational Physics 2004; 193(2):357-397.
42. Dembo RS, Eisenstat SC, Steihaug T. Inexact Newton methods. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analyses 1982; 19(2):400-408.
43. Risler F, Rey C. Iterative accelerating algorithms with Krylov subspaces for the solution to large-scale nonlinear problems. Numerical Algorithms 2000; 23(1):1-30.
44. Dostál Z. Conjugate gradient method with preconditioning by projector. International Journal of Computer Mathematics 1988; 23(3):315-323.
45. Riks E. The application of Newton's method to the problem of elastic stability. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1972; 39(4):1060-1065.
46. Gosselet P. Méthodes de décomposition de domaine et méthodes d'accélération pour les problèmes multichamps en mécanique non-linéaire. PhD Thesis, Université Paris 6, 2003.
47. Astrid P, Weiland S, Willcox K, Backx T. Missing point estimation in models described by proper orthogonal decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2008; 53(10):2237-2251.