Final kissing ballooning and long-term clinical outcomes in coronary bifurcation lesions treated with 1-stent technique: Results from the COBIS registry

Heart

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 225-231

  Gwon, Hyeon Cheol ^a   Hahn, Joo Yong ^a   Koo, Bon Kwon ^b   Song, Young Bin ^a   Choi, Seung Hyuk ^a   Choi, Jin Ho ^a   Lee, Sang Hoon ^a   Jeong, Myung Ho ^c   Kim, Hyo Soo ^b   Seong, In Whan ^d   Yang, Ju Young ^e   Rha, Seung Woon ^f   Jang, Yangsoo ^g   Yoon, Jung Han ^h   Tahk, Seung Jea ⁱ   Seung, Ki Bae ^j   Park, Seung Jung ^k  

^a Samsung Medical Center   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Chonnam National University Medical School   (South Korea)

^d Chungnam National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^e National Health Insurance Corporation   (South Korea)

^f Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^g Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^h Yonsei University Wonju   (South Korea)

ⁱ Ajou University Medical Center   (South Korea)

^j The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^k University of Ulsan   (South Korea)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RAPAMYCIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY BIFURCATION LESION; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FEMALE; FINAL KISSING BALLOONING; FOLLOW UP; HEART DEATH; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; REVASCULARIZATION; SCORING SYSTEM; STENT THROMBOSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TARGET LESION REVASCULARIZATION;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CAUSE OF DEATH; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REGISTRIES; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; STENTS; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84655161438     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300322     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Zhang F, Dong L, Ge J. Simple versus complex stenting strategy for coronary artery bifurcation lesions in the drug-eluting stent era: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Heart 2009;95:1676-81.
2. Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic Bifurcation Study. Circulation 2006;114:1955-61. (Pubitemid 44665390)
3. Colombo A, Bramucci E, Sacca S, et al. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: the CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study. Circulation 2009;119:71-8.
4. Hildick-Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, et al. Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation 2010;121:1235-43.
5. Latib A, Colombo A, Sangiorgi GM. Bifurcation stenting: current strategies and new devices. Heart 2009;95:495-504.
6. Niemela M, Kervinen K, Erglis A, et al. Randomized comparison of final kissing balloon dilatation versus no final kissing balloon dilatation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with main vessel stenting: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III. Circulation 2011;123:79-86.
7. Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, et al. Sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary bifurcations results: from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1743-50.
8. Lansky AJ, Dangas G, Mehran R, et al. Quantitative angiographic methods for appropriate end-point analysis, edge-effect evaluation, and prediction of recurrent restenosis after coronary brachytherapy with gamma irradiation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:274-80. (Pubitemid 34084633)
9. Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M. [A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions] (In Spanish). Rev Esp Cardiol 2006;59:183.
10. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 2007;115:2344-51. (Pubitemid 46685903)
11. Breslow N. Covariance adjustment of relative-risk estimates in matched studies. Biometrics 1982;38:661-72. (Pubitemid 13286342)
12. Gwon HC, Choi SH, Song YB, et al. Long-term clinical results and predictors of adverse outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation for bifurcation lesions in a real-world practice: the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) registry. Circ J 2010;74:2322-8.
13. Romagnoli E, De Servi S, Tamburino C, et al. Real-world outcome of coronary bifurcation lesions in the drug-eluting stent era: results from the 4,314-patient Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology (SICIeGISE) Italian Multicenter Registry on Bifurcations (IeBIGIS). Am Heart J 2010;160:535-42.e1.
14. Hoye A, Iakovou I, Ge L, et al. Long-term outcomes after stenting of bifurcation lesions with the "crush" technique: predictors of an adverse outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1949-58.
15. Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Morice MC. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary disease. Heart 2004;90:713-22. (Pubitemid 38668558)
16. de Lezo JS, Medina A, Martin P, et al. Ultrasound findings during percutaneous treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions. Rev Esp Cardiol 2008;61:930-5.
17. Williams AR, Koo BK, Gundert TJ, et al. Local hemodynamic changes caused by main branch stent implantation and subsequent virtual side branch balloon angioplasty in a representative coronary bifurcation. J Appl Physiol 2010;109:532-40.
18. Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, et al. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:633-7.