Artifacts, activities, and design knowledge

Design Integrations: Research and Collaboration

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 67-85

  Kuutti, Kari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84555219687     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Buchanan, Richard. 2001. Design Research and the New Learning. Design Issues, 17.4, 3–23.
2. Chaiklin, S., M. Hedegaard and U.J. Jensen (eds.). 1999. Activity Theory and Social Practice. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
3. Cole, M. and Y. Engeström. 1993. A cultural–historical approach to distributed cognition. In Salomom, G. (ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1–47.
4. Cross, Nigel. 2001. Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline versus Design Science. Design Issues, 17.3, 49–55.
5. Dewey, John. 1938-1991. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. In Boydston, J. (ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925-1953. Vol. 12. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
6. Engeström, Yrjö. 1987. Learning by expanding. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
7. Findeli, Alain. 2001. Rethinking Design Education for the 21st Century: Theoretical, Methodological and Ethical Discussion. Design Issues, 17.1, 5–17.
8. Gay, G. and H. Hembrooke. 2004. Activity-Centered Design: An Ecological Approach to Designing Smart Tools and Usable Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Iacucci, G., A. Juustila, K. Kuutti, P. Pehkonen and A. Ylisaukko-oja. 2003. Connecting Remote Visits and Design Environment: User Needs and Prototypes for Architecture Design. In Luca Chittaro (Ed.): Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 5th International Symposium, Mobile HCI 2003, Udine, Italy, September 8-11, 2003, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2795. Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 45–60.
10. Koestler, Arthur. 1970. Act of Creation. New York, NY: MacMillan Publishing Company.
11. Kuutti, Kari. 1996. Activity Theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In Nardi, B. (ed.), Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 17–44.
12. Leont’ev, A.N. 1978. Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Leontjev, A.N. 1989. The Problem of Activity in the History of Soviet Psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27.1, 22–39.
14. Moholy-Nagy, Lazlo. 1938. Why Bauhaus Education? Shelter (March 1938), 7–22. Cited in Findeli, A. 2001. Rethinking Design Education in the 21th Century: Theoretical, Methodological, and Ethical Discussion. Design Issues, 17.1, 5–16.
15. Nelson, Harold G. and Erik Stolterman. 2003. The Design Way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
16. Raeithel, Arne. 1992. Activity Theory as a Foundation for Design. In Floyd, Züllighoven, Budde and Keil- Slawik (eds.), Software development and reality construction. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
17. Simon, Herbert. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Toulmin, Stephen. 2001. Return to Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.