Multidisciplinary optimization with applications to sonic-boom minimization

Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics

Volumn 44, Issue , 2011, Pages 505-526

  Alonso, Juan J ^a   Colonno, Michael R ^a  

^a Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Department of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial for Computational and Mathematical Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Aircraft design; Boom propagation; Noise; Perceived loudness; Robust design; Supersonic design; Supersonic flow

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT DESIGN; CURRENT STATUS; HUMAN EAR; KEY CONSTRAINTS; MAN-MADE STRUCTURES; MULTI-DISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATIONS; NOISE; PERCEIVED LOUDNESS; PRESSURE DISTURBANCE; RESEARCH EFFORTS; ROBUST DESIGNS; SONIC BOOMS;

AERODYNAMICS; DESIGN; SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT; SUPERSONIC FLOW;

AEROSERVOELASTICITY;

ACOUSTIC WAVE; AERODYNAMICS; AIRCRAFT; FUTURE PROSPECT; OPTIMIZATION; SEISMIC NOISE; SONIC BOOM; WAVE PROPAGATION;

EID: 84555196963     PISSN: 00664189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101133     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alonso J, Kroo I, Jameson A. 2002. Advanced algorithms for design and optimization of quiet supersonic platforms. Presented at AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Exhib., 40th, Reno, NV, AIAA Pap. 2002-0144
2. Aronstein D, Schueler K. 2005. Two supersonic business aircraft conceptual designs, with and without sonic boom constraint. J. Aircr. 42:775-86 (Pubitemid 41013381)
3. Ashley H, Landahl M. 1965. Aerodynamics of Wings and Bodies. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
4. Campbell R, Carter M, Deere K, Waithe K. 2008. Efficient unstructured grid adaptation methods for sonic boom prediction. Presented at AIAA Appl. Aerodyn. Conf., 26th, Honolulu, AIAA Pap. 2008-7327
5. Cheung S, 1994. Sonic boom softening of reference-H. Tech. Rep., NASA Langley Res. Cent., Orlando, FL
6. Cheung S, Edwards T, Lawrence S. 1992. Application of CFD to sonic boom near-and mid-field prediction. J. Aircr. 29:920-26 (Pubitemid 23558697)
7. Chiba K, Makino Y, Takatoya T. 2008. Evolutionary-based multidisciplinary design exploration for the silent supersonic technology demonstrator wing. J. Aircr. 45:1481-94
8. Choi S, Alonso J, Kroo I, Wintzer M. 2008. Multifidelity design optimization of low-boom supersonic jets. J. Aircr. 45:106-18 (Pubitemid 351607263)
9. Choi S, Alonso JJ, van der Weide E. 2009. Numerical and mesh resolution requirements for accurate sonic boom prediction. J. Aircr. 46:1126-39
10. Choi S, Chung HS, Alonso JJ. 2004. Design of low-boom supersonic business jet with evolutionary algorithms using adaptive unstructured mesh. Presented at AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct., Struct. Dyn. Mater. Conf., 45th, Palm Springs, CA, AIAA Pap. 2004-1758
11. Chung HS, Alonso JJ. 2002. Design of a low-boom supersonic business jet using Cokriging approximation models. Presented at AIAA/ISSMO Symp. Multidiscip. Anal. Optim., 9th, Atlanta, AIAA Pap. 2002-5598
12. Collard D, 1991. Concorde airframe design and development. SAE Trans. 100:2620-41 (Pubitemid 23587139)
13. Colonno M, Alonso J. 2010. Sonic boom minimization revisited: the robustness of optimal low-boom designs. Presented at AIAA/ISSMO Multidiscip. Anal. Optim. Conf., 13th, Fort Worth, TX, AIAA Pap. 2010-9364
14. Coulouvrat F, 2009. The challenges of defining an acceptable sonic boom overland. Presented at AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoust. Conf. (30th AIAA Aeroacoust. Conf.), 15th, Miami, AIAA Pap. 2009-3384
15. Cowart R, Grindle T. 2008. An overview of the Gulfstream/NASA quiet spike flight test program. Presented at AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Exhib., 46th, Reno, NV, AIAA Pap. 2008-123
16. Darden C, 1975. Minimization of sonic-boom parameters in real and isothermal atmospheres. Tech. Rep. TN D-7842, NASA
17. Darden C. 1977. Sonic boom theory: its status in prediction and minimization. J. Aircr. 14:569-76
18. Fund. Aeronaut. Prog. 2008. Fundamental aeronautics program overview. http://www.aeronautics.nasa.gov/fap/documents.html
19. George A, Seebass R. 1971. Sonic boom minimization including both front and rear shocks. AIAA Tech. Notes 9:2091-93
20. Gill PE, Murray W, Wright M. 1982. Practical Optimization. New York: Academic
21. Gold T. 1952. The 'double bang' of supersonic aircraft. Nature 170:808
22. Hayes W, 1947. Linearized supersonic flow. North Am. Aviat. Rep. AL-222, Calif. Inst. Technol.
23. Hayes WD, Haefeli RC, Kulsrud HE. 1969. Sonic boom propagation in a stratified atmosphere, with computer program. Tech. Rep. NASA/CR 1299, NASA
24. Henne P. 2003. The case for small supersonic civil aircraft. Presented at AIAA/ICAS Int. Air Space Symp. Expo., Dayton, OH, AIAA Pap. 2003-2555
25. Henne P, 2005. Case for small supersonic civil aircraft. J. Aircr. 42:765-74 (Pubitemid 41013380)
26. Howe D, Waithe K, Haering E. 2008. Quiet spike near field flight test pressure measurements with computational fluid dynamics comparisons. Presented at AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Exhib., 46th, Reno, NV, AIAA Pap. 2008-128
27. Jones L, 1961. Lower bounds for sonic bangs. J. R. Aeronaut. Soc. 65:1-4
28. Jones R, 1953. Theory of wing-body drag at supersonic speeds. Tech. Rep. RM A53H18a, NACA
29. Jung T, Starkey R, Argrow B. 2011. Feasibility study of using a small-scale UAS for sonic boom minimization research. Presented at AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet., 49th, Orlando, FL, AIAA Pap. 2011-1280
30. Li W, Shields E, Le D. 2008. Interactive inverse design optimization of fuselage shape for low-boom supersonic concepts. J. Aircr. 45:1381-97
31. Makino Y, Kroo I. 2006. Robust objective functions for sonic-boom minimization. J. Aircr. 43:1301-6 (Pubitemid 44713936)
32. McLean FE, 1965. Some nonasymptotic effects on the sonic boom of large aircraft. Tech. Rep. NASA/TN D-2877, NASA
33. McLean FE. 1968. Configuration design for specified pressure signature characteristics. Tech. Rep. NASA/SP 180, NASA
34. Morgenstern J, Norstrud N, Stelmack M, Skoch C. 2010. Final report for the advanced concept studies for supersonic commercial transports entering service in the 2030 to 2035 period, N+3 supersonic program. Tech. Rep. NASA/CR 2010-216796, Lockheed Martin Aeronaut. Co. Natl. Res. Council. 1997. U.S. supersonic commercial aircraft: assessing NASA's high speed research program. Tech. Rep., Natl. Res. Council, Washington, DC
35. Ozcer I. 2007. Sonic boom prediction using Euler/full potential methodology. Presented at AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Exhib., 45th, Reno, NV, AIAA Pap. 2007-369
36. Pawlowski J, Graham D, Boccadoro C, Coen P, Maglieri D. 2005. Origins and overview of the shaped sonic boom demonstration program. Presented at AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Exhib., 43rd, Reno, NV, AIAA Pap. 2005-0005
37. Plotkin K, 1989. Review of sonic boom theory. Presented at Aeroacoust. Conf., 12th, San Antonio, TX, AIAA Pap. 89-1105
38. Plotkin K, 2002. Extrapolation of sonic boom signatures from CFD solutions. Presented at AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Exhib., 40th, Reno, NV, AIAA Pap. 2002-922
39. Rallabhandi S, 2011. Advanced sonic boom prediction using augmented Burger's equation. Presented at 49th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet., Orlando, FL, AIAA Pap. 2011-1278
40. Reuther JJ, Jameson A, Alonso JJ, Rimlinger MJ, Saunders D. 1999. Constrained multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization using an adjoint formulation and parallel computers, parts 1 and 2. AIAA J. Aircr. 36:51-74
41. Seebass A, 1973. The design or operation of aircraft to minimize their sonic boom. Presented at 5th AIAA Aircr. Des., Flight Test, Oper. Meet., St. Louis, AIAA Pap. 1973-817
42. Seebass A, Argrow B. 1998. Sonic boom minimization revisited. Presented at Theoret. Fluid Mech. Meet., 2nd, Albuquerque, NM, AIAA Pap. 1998-2956
43. Seebass A, George A. 1973. Sonic boom reduction through aircraft design and operation. AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet., 11th, Washington, DC, AIAA Pap. 1973-241
44. Seebass A, George A. 1974. Design and operation of aircraft to minimize their sonic boom. J. Aircr. 11:509-17
45. Seebass R, 1969a. Minimum sonic boom shock strengths and overpressures. Nature 221:651-53
46. Seebass R, 1969b. Sonic boom theory. J. Aircr. 6:177-84
47. Seebass R, George A. 1972. Sonic-boom minimization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51:686-94
48. Tetzloff I, Crossley W. 2011. Evaluating market and environmental impacts of an N+3 supersonic aircraft. Presented at AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Exhib., 49th, Orlando, FL, AIAA Pap. 2011-463
49. Thomas C, 1972. Extrapolation of sonic boom pressure signatures by the waveform parameter method. Tech. Rep. D-6832, NASA
50. Warren CHE. 1953. Noise from aircraft at supersonic speeds. Nature 171:214-16
51. Welge H, Nelson C, Bonet J. 2010. Supersonic vehicle systems for the 2020 to 2035 timeframe. Presented at AIAA Appl. Aerodyn. Conf., 28th, Chicago, AIAA Pap. 2010-4930
52. Whitham G, 1952. The flow pattern of a supersonic projectile. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 5:301-48
53. Wintzer M, Nemec M, Aftosmis M. 2010. Adjoint-based adaptive mesh refinement for sonic boom prediction. Presented at AIAA Appl. Aerodyn. Conf., 26th, Honolulu, AIAA Pap. 2008-6593
54. Yamashita H, Obayashi S. 2009. Sonic boom variability due to homogeneous atmospheric turbulence. J. Aircr. 46:1886-93