Surgical site infections after abdominal closure in colorectal surgery using triclosan-coated absorbable suture (PDS Plus) vs. Uncoated sutures (PDS II): A randomized multicenter study

Surgical Infections

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 483-489

  Baracs, Jozsef ^a   Huszár, Orsolya ^a   Sajjadi, Shahram Ghotb ^a   Peter Horvath O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSORBABLE SUTURE; POLYDIOXANONE; TRICLOSAN;

ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COLON FLORA; COLORECTAL SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; ENTEROCOCCUS; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FEMALE; GRAM POSITIVE INFECTION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LITERATURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT CODING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK FACTOR; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; SURGICAL INFECTION; SUTURE; WOUND DRESSING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS, LOCAL; COLONIC DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTAL DISEASES; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; SUTURES; TRICLOSAN; WOUND HEALING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84555196247     PISSN: 10962964     EISSN: 15578674     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2011.001     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Smyth ET, Emmerson AM. Surgical site infection surveil-lance. J Hosp Infect 2000;45:173-184.
2. Beilman GJ Dunn DL. Surgical infections. In: Brunicardi FC (ed): Schwartz's Principles of Surgery. Ninth edition. New York. McGraw-Hill 2009:113-134.
3. Katsunori N, Nobuyoshi H, Masami Y, et al. How can we control intraoperative bacterial contamination and surgical-site infection during an anterior resection or Hartmann's/ Miles' operation? J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:1995-2000.
4. Akihiro W, Shunji K, Rinshun S, et al. Risk factors associated with surgical site infection in upper and lower gastrointes-tinal surgery. Surg Today 2008;38:404-412.
5. Porras-Hernandez J, Bracho-Blanchet E, Tovilla-Mercado J. A standardized peri-operative surgical site infection care process among children with stoma closure: A before-after study. World J Surg 2008;32:2316-2323.
6. Kobayashi M, Mohri Y, Inoue Y, et al. Continuous follow-up of surgical site infections for 30 days after colorectal surgery. World J Surg 2008;32:1142-1146.
7. Nichols RL, Smith JW, Garcia RY, et al. Current practices of preoperative bowel preparation among North American colorectal surgeons. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:609-619. (Pubitemid 27143554)
8. Nichols RL, Choe EU, Weldon CB. Mechanical and anti-bacterial bowel preparation in colon and rectal surgery. Chemotherapy 2005;51(Suppl 1):115-121. (Pubitemid 40663198)
9. Nichols RL, Holmes JW. Prophylaxis in bowel surgery. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis 1995;15:76-96.
10. Jimenez JC, Wilson SE. Prophylaxis of infection for elective colorectal surgery. Surg Infect 2003;4:273-280. (Pubitemid 37428281)
11. Clarke JS, Condon RE, Bartlett JG, et al. Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce septic complications of colon operations: Results of prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study. Ann Surg 1977;186:251-259. (Pubitemid 8170966)
12. Kaya E, Paksoy E, Ozturk E, et al. Subcutaneous closed-suction drainage does not affect surgical site infection rate following elective abdominal operations: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Acta Chir Belg 2010;110:457-462.
13. Rothenburger S, Spangler D, Bhende S. In vitro antimicro-bial evaluation of coated VICRYL® Plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 with triclosan) using zone of inhi-bition assays. Surg Infect 2002;3(Suppl 1):539-587.
14. Edmiston CE, Seabrook GR, Goheen MP, et al. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: Can antibacterial-coated su-tures reduce the risk of microbial contamination? J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:481-489. (Pubitemid 44416259)
15. Fleck T, Moidl R, Blacky A, et al. Triclosan-coated sutures for the reduction of sternal wound infections: Economic con-siderations. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:232-236. (Pubitemid 46921148)
16. Deliaert AE, Van den Kerckhove E, Tuinder S, et al. The effect of triclosan-coated sutures in wound healing: A dou-ble blind randomised prospective pilot study. J Plast Re-constr Aesthet Surg 2008;62:771-773.
17. Justinger C, Moussavian MR, Schlueter C, et al. Antibiotic coating of abdominal closure sutures and wound infection. Surgery 2009;145:330-334.
18. Gómez-Alonso A, Garć?a-Criado FJ, Parreño-Manchado FC, et al. Study of the efficacy of coated VICRYL Plus antibac-terial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) in two animal models of general surgery. J Infect 2007;54:82-88. (Pubitemid 44932941)
19. Storch ML, Rothenburger SJ, Jacinto G Experimental effi-cacy study of coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture in guinea pigs challenged with Staphylococcus aureus. Surg In-fect 2004;5:281-288. (Pubitemid 39462171)
20. Storch M, Perry LC, Davidson JM, et al. A 28-day study of the effect of coated VICRYL® Plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) on wound healing in guinea pig linear incisional skin wounds. Surg Infect 2002;3(Suppl 1):S89-S98.
21. Gilbert P, McBain AJ. Literature-based evaluation of the potential risks associated with impregnation of medical de-vices and implants with triclosan. Surg Infect 2002;3(Suppl 1):S55-S63.
22. Williams N Sweetland H, Goyal S, et al. Randomized trial of antimicrobial-coated sutures to prevent surgical site infec-tion after breast cancer surgery. Surg Infect 2011;12:XXX-XXX.
23. Ford HR, Jones P, Gaines B, et al. Intra-operative handling and wound healing: Controlled clinical trial comparing coated VICRYL Plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with coated VICRYL suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture). Surg Infect 2005;6:313-321. (Pubitemid 41645597)
24. Barbolt TA. Chemistry and safety of triclosan, and its use as an antimicrobial coating on coated VICRYL® Plus antibac-terial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan). Surg Infect 2002;3(Suppl 1):S45-S53.
25. Müller G, Kramer A. Biocompatibility index of antiseptic agents by parallel assessment of antimicrobial activity and cellular cytotoxicity. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;61:1281-1287. (Pubitemid 351753595)
26. Müller G, Kramer A. Effect of selected wound antiseptics on adult articular cartilage (bovine sesamoid bone) in the presence of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J Or-thop Res 2005;23:127-133. (Pubitemid 40045086)
27. Alicia JM, Teresa CH, Michele LP, et al. Guidelines for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250-280.
28. Ho VP, Barie PS, Stein SL, et al. Antibiotic regimen and the timing of prophylaxis are important for reducing surgical site infection after elective abdominal colorectal surgery. Surg Infect 2011;12:255-260. Available at www.itplan.hu/sebstudy/
29. Fry DE. Fifty ways to cause surgical site infections. Surg Infect 2011;12:497-500.
30. Tsuyoshi K, Toshiaki W, Junji K, et al. Elective colon and rectal surgery differ in risk factors for wound infection. Ann Surg 2006;244:758-763.
31. Robert LS, Jamie KB, Shannon TM, et al. Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 2004;239: 599-607.
32. Reiping T, Hong HC, Yung LW, et al. Risk factors for sur-gical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: A single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecu-tive patients. Ann Surg 2001;234:181-189.
33. Weber WP, Mart WR, Zwahlen M, et al. The timing of sur-gical antimicrobial prophylaxis. Ann Surg 2008;247:918-926.
34. Kirchoff P, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D. Complications in co-lorectal surgery: Risk factors and preventive strategies. Pa-tient Safety Surg 2010;4:5-27.
35. Blumetti J, Luu M, Sarosi G, et al. Surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: Do risk factors vary depending on the type of infection considered? Surgery 2007;142:704-711. (Pubitemid 350018841)
36. Ming X, Rothenburger S, Nichols MM. In vivo and in vitro antibacterial efficacy of PDS plus (polidioxanone with tri-closan) suture. Surg Infect 2008;9:451-457.
37. Marco F, Vallez R, Gonzalez P, et al. Study of the efficacy of coated Vicryl Plus antibacterial suture in an animal model of orthopaedic surgery. Surg Infect 2007;8:359-365. (Pubitemid 47186306)
38. Storch M, Scalzo H, Van LS, et al. Physical and functional comparison of coated VICRYL Plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with coated VICRYL suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture). Surg Infect 2002;3(Suppl 1):S65-S77.