Qualitative evaluation to explain success of multifaceted technology-driven hypertension intervention

American Journal of Managed Care

Volumn 17, Issue SPEC. ISSUE, 2011, Pages

  Millery, Mari ^a   Shelley, Donna ^b   Wu, Daren ^c   Ferrari, Pamela ^c   Tseng, Tuo Yen ^b   Kopal, Helene ^d  

^a Department of Medicine   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Open Door Family Medical Center   (United States)

^d Primary Care Development Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; DISEASE CONTROL; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTERVENTION STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

ALGORITHMS; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84555178597     PISSN: 10880224     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121(7):e46-e215.
2. Millery M, Kukafka R. Health information technology and quality of health care: strategies for reducing disparities in underresourced settings. Med Care Res Rev. 2010;67(5 suppl):268S-298S.
3. Persell SD, Kaiser D, Dolan NC, et al. Changes in performance after implementation of a multifaceted electronic-health-record-based quality improvement system. Med Care. 2011;49(2):117-125.
4. Hicks LS, Sequist TD, Ayanian JZ, et al. Impact of computerized decision support on blood pressure management and control: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(4):429-441. (Pubitemid 351464862)
5. Bosworth HB, Olsen MK, Dudley T, et al. Patient education and provider decision support to control blood pressure in primary care: a cluster randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2009;157(3):450-456.
6. Choma NN, Huang RL, Dittus RS, Burnham KE, Roumie CL. Quality improvement initiatives improve hypertension care among veterans. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(4):392-398.
7. Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10(4):282-298. (Pubitemid 26081505)
8. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
9. Linnan L, Steckler A. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. In: Steckler A, Linnan L, eds. Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
10. Stetler CB, Legro, MW, Wallace CM, et al. The role of formative evaluation in implementation research and the QUERI experience. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(s2):S1-S8.
11. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 2003;27(3): 425-478.
12. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. 2000;46(2):186-204. (Pubitemid 30594361)
13. Holden RJ. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43(1):159-172.
14. DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inform Syst. 2003; 19(4):9-30.
15. Øvretveit J, Scott T, Rundall TG, Shortell SM, Brommels M. Implementation of electronic medical records in hospitals: two case studies. Health Policy. 2007;84(2-3):181-190. (Pubitemid 47633724)
16. US Department of Health and Human Services; National Heart Lung and Blood Institure. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure-Complete Report. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jnc7full.htm. Published 2004. Accessed August 15, 2011.
17. Shelley D, Tseng, T, Matthews A, et al. Technology-driven intervention to improve hypertension outcomes in community health centers. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(12 Spec No.):SP103-SP110.
18. Shelley D, Tseng T, Andrews H, et al. Controlled hypertension among a low income diverse population with access to care in community health centers. Am J Hypertens. In press.
19. Frechtling JA. Logic Modeling Methods in Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007.
20. Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Managing Technological Change: Organizational Aspects of Health Informatics. New York, NY: Springer; 2004.
21. Ludwick DA, Doucette J. Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78 (1):22-31.
22. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):501-504.