Who gets struck off?

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 343, Issue 7837, 2011, Pages

  Wakeford, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL FEE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; REGISTRATION; SPECIALIZATION; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICINE; STATISTICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MALPRACTICE; MEDICINE; PHYSICIANS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 84455206100     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d7842     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. General Medical Council. Annual Statistics 2009. www.gmc-uk.org/ publications/2009-annual-statistics.asp.
2. Wakeford R. Licentious licentiates, medical malfeasants: a study of doctors struck off the medical register for disciplinary reasons 1860-1991. Cambridge Medicine 1996;12:10-4.
3. Smith RG. Medical discipline: the professional conduct jurisdiction of the General Medical Council, 1858-1990. Clarendon Press, 1994.
4. IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 19. IBM UK.
5. Wakeford R. LMSSA: a back door entry into medicine? BMJ 1987;294:890-1. (Pubitemid 17046391)
6. Wakeford R. Apothecaries reduce exams. BMJ 1989;298:604.
7. Watmough S, Bowhay A. An evaluation of the impact of country of primary medical qualification on performance in the UK Royal College of Anaesthetists' examinations. Medical Teacher 2011;33:938-40.
8. Bruce L, ed. The state of medical education and practice in the UK. General Medical Council, 2011:82 (Word version).