The Unity of Public Law

The Unity of Public Law

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-496

  Dyzenhaus, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84455196119     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (330)

1. ABEL, AS (1963-4) ‘Materials Proper for Consideration in Certiorari to Tribunals: I’ 15 University of Toronto Law Journal 102.
2. AIKEN, S and SCOTT, S (2002) ‘Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) and the Rights of Children’ 14 Journal of Law and Social Policy 211.
3. ALLAN, TRS (1998) ‘Procedural Fairness and the Duty of Respect’ 18 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 497.
4. ALLAN, TRS (1998) ‘Fairness, Equality, Rationality: Constitutional Theory and Judicial Review’ in C Forsyth and I Hare (eds), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
5. ALLAN, TRS (2001) Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
6. ALLARS, M (1990) Introduction to Australian Administrative Law (Sydney, Butterworths).
7. ALLARS, M (1995) ‘One Small Step for Legal Doctrine, One Giant Leap Towards Integrity in Government: Teoh’s Case and the Internationalization of Administrative Law’ 17 Sydney Law Review 204.
8. ALLARS, M (1999) ‘Human Rights, Ukases and Merits Review Tribunals: The Impact of Teoh’s case on the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in Australia’ in M Harris and M Partington (eds), Administrative Justice in the Twenty First Century (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
9. ALLEN, T (2000) The Right to Property in Commonwealth Constitutions (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
10. ALSTON, P (1997) ‘The Myopia of the Handmaidens: International Lawyers and Globalization’ 3 European Journal of International Law 435.
11. ALSTON, P (ed) (1999) The EU and Human Rights (New York, Oxford University Press).
12. ALVARO, A (1991) ‘Why Property Rights Were Excluded from the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ 24 Canadian Journal of Political Science 309.
13. ANGHIE, A (1999) ‘Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in Nineteenth-Century International Law’ 40 Harvard International Law Journal 1.
14. ARENDT, H (1977), Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought (New York, Penguin Books).
15. ARONSON, M and DYER, B (2000) Judicial Review of Administrative Action (Sydney, LBC Information Services).
16. ARTHURS, H (1985) ‘Without the Law’: Administrative Justice and Legal Pluralism in Nineteenth Century England (Toronto, University of Toronto Press).
17. AQUINAS, T (1964-75) Summa Theologicae (New York, Eyre & Spottiswoode and McGraw-Hill).
18. AUST, A (2000) Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
19. AUSTIN, J (1954) The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson).
20. BAKER, JH (1989) ‘Records, Reports and the Origins of Case-Law in England’ in JH BAKER (ed), Judicial Records, Law Reports and the Growth of Case Law (Berlin, Duncker & Humblot).
21. BALDWIN, R and HOUGHTON, J (1985) ‘Circular Arguments: The Status and Legitimacy of Administrative Rules’ Public Law 239-84.
22. BALDWIN R and HAWKINS (1984) ‘Discretionary Justice: David Reconsidered’ Public Law 570.
23. BARING-GOULD, WS and BARING-GOULD, C (1962) (eds & compliers) The Annotated Mother Goose: Nursery Rhymes Old and New, Arranged and Explained (New York, Bramhall House).
24. BARNARD, K ST C (1999) ‘Reflections on the Human Rights Role of the European Parliament’, in P Alston (ed), The EU and Human Rights (New York, Oxford University Press).
25. BASTARACHE, M (2000) ‘The Honourable GV La Forest’s Use of Foreign Materials in the Supreme Court of Canada and His Influence on Foreign Courts’ in R Johnson et al (eds), Gérard V LaForest at the Supreme Court of Canada 1985-1997 (Winnipeg, Canadian Legal History Project).
26. BELLEY, J (1997) ‘Law as terra incognita: Constructing Legal Pluralism’ 12(2) Canadian Journal of Law and Society 17.
27. BENTHAM, J [1789] An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation’ JH Bwns and HLA Hart (eds) (London, Methuens, 1980)
28. BERMANN, HJ and REID, CJ ‘Roman Law in Europe and the Jus Commune: A Historical Overview with emphasis on the New Legal Science of the Sixteenth Century’ (1994) 20 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce.
29. BERRYMAN, J (2000) The Law of Equitable Remedies (Toronto, Irwin Law).
30. BESSELINK, L (1998) ‘Entrapped by the Maximum Standard: On Fundamental Rights, Pluralism and Subsidiarity in the European Union’ 35 Common Market Law Review 629.
31. BLACHE, P and COMTOIS, S (1997) ‘L’affaire Ross: Normes de contrôle judiciaire-Droits de la personne-Insuffisance de preuve. Rapport entre la norme de raisonnabilité de l’article 1 de la Charte et celle du droit administratif’, Revue du Barreau du Québec 105.
32. BLACKSTONE, W [1765] Commentaries on the Laws of England (Oxford, Clarendon Press; facsimile, University of Chicago Press, 1979), Volume I.
33. BOHMAN, J (1997) ‘The Public Spheres of the World Citizen’ in J Bohman and M Lutz-Bachman (eds), Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal (Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press).
34. BOHMAN, J and LUTZ-BACHMANN, M (1997) ‘Introduction’, in J Bohman and M Lutz-Bachmann (eds), Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal (Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press).
35. BOUCHARD, G and WAKE CARROL, B (2002) ‘Policy-Making and Administrative Discretion: The Case of Immigration in Canada’ 45 Canadian Public Administration 239.
36. BOYLE, C and MACCRIMMON, M (2002) ‘Reasons for Judgment: A Comment on R v Sheppard and R v Braich’ 47 Criminal Law Quarterly 39.
37. BRANDON, E (2002) ‘Does international law mean anything in Canadian Courts?' 11 Journal of Environmental Law and Practice.
38. BRIDGES, L, MESZAROS, G and SUNKIN, M (1995) Judicial Review in Perspective (London, Cavendish).
39. BROWN, D and EVANS, J ‘Discretionary Justice: Reasons and Reasonableness: Case Comment on Baker’ www. brownandevans.com/case.
40. BRUDNER, A (1985) ‘The Domestic Enforcement of International Covenants on Human Rights: A Theoretical Framework’, 35 University of Toronto Law Journal 219.
41. BRUNNÉE, J (2002) ‘A Long and Winding Road: Bringing International Environmental Law into Canadian Courts’ in M Anderson and P Galizzi (eds), International Environmental Law in National Courts (London, British Institute of International and Comparative Law) 45.
42. BRUNNÉE J and TOOPE, SJ (2000) ‘International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an Interactional Theory of International Law’ 39 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 19.
43. BRUNNÉE J (2002) A Hesitant Embrace: The Application of International Law by Canadian Courts 40 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 3.
44. BRUNNÉE J (2002) ‘The Changing Nile Basin Regime: Does Law Matter?' 43 Harvard International Law Journal 105.
45. CALABRESI, G (1985) Ideals, Beliefs and Attitudes: Private Law Perspectives on a Public Law Problem (Syracuse, NY, Syracuse University Press).
46. CAIRNS, JA and MACLEOD, G (2002) (eds) ‘The dearest birth right of the people of England’: The jury in the history of the common law (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
47. CAMPBELL, A and GLASS, KATHLEEN C (2001) ‘The Legal Status of Clinical and Ethics Policies, Codes, and Guidelines in Medical Practice and Research’ 46 McGill Law Journal 473-489.
48. CANON, B (2002) ‘Studying Bureaucratic Implementation of Judicial Policies: Conceptual Approaches’ paper presented to Tilburg Workshop on Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact (7 November 2002).
49. CANON, B and JOHNSON, C (1999) Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact, 2nd edn. (Washington, CQ Press).
50. CARTIER, G (2001) ‘La discrétion administrative: une occasion de dialogue entre citoyens et tribunaux?' in SG Coughlan and D Russell (eds), Citizenship and Citizen Participation in the Administration of Justice (Montreal, Éditions Thémis).
51. CARTIER, G (forthcoming, 2003) ‘Administrative Law Twenty Years After the Charter’, Revue du Barreau du Québec, Numero Special 197.
52. CASSESE, A CLAPHAM, A, and WEILER, J (eds) (1991) Human Rights and the European Community (Baden-Baden, Nomos).
53. CHAMBERS, R [1767-1773] A Course of Lectures on the English Law: Delivered at the University of Oxford, 1767-1773 TM Curley (ed) (Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1986).
54. CHOUDRY, S (1999) ‘Globalization in Search of Justification: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation’ Indiana Law Journal 819.
55. CHINKIN, C (1989) ‘The Challenge of Soft-Law: Development and Change in International Law’ 38 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 850.
56. CHWIALKOWSKA, L ‘Global law emerging, judge tells conference-Canada struggling to accommodate international treaties and tribunals’ The National Post (13 April 2002) A6.
57. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION CANADA, The Ethical Compass (March 1998), at http: //www.cic.gc.ca/english/pub/values%2De.html#case4.
58. CLAPHAM, A (1990) ‘A Human Rights Policy for the European Community’ 10 Yearbook of European Law 309.
59. COOKE, R (1992) ‘The Quest for Administrative Justice’ 18 Commonwealth Law Bulletin 1326.
60. COPPEL, J and O’NEILL, A (1992) ‘The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously?' Legal Studies: The Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law 227.
61. COWEL, J (1651) The Institutes of the Lawes of England (London, Tho Roycroft).
62. CRAIG, P (1994) ‘The Common Law, Reasons and Administrative Justice’ 53 Cambridge Law Journal 282.
63. CRAIG, P (1997) ‘Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework’ [1997] Public Law 467
64. CRAIG, P (1998) ‘Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review’ Cambridge Law Journal 63.
65. CRAIG, P (1999) ‘Competing Models of Judicial Review’ Public Law 428
66. CRAIG, P (1999) Administrative Law 4th edn (Sweet & Maxwell, London).
67. CRAIG, P [2000] ‘Public Law, Political Theory and Legal Theory’ Public Law 211.
68. CRAIG, P (2001) ‘The Courts, the Human Rights Act and Judicial Review’ 117 Law Quarterly Review 589.
69. CRAIG and DE BÚRCA (2002) EU Law, Text, Cases and Materials 3rd edn, (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
70. CREYKE, R and MACMILLAN, J (2002) ‘The External Review Project’ 9 Australian Journal of Administrative Law 163.
71. CRUMP, D (1996) ‘How Do the Courts Really Discover Unenumerated Fundamental Rights? Cataloguing the Methods of Judicial Alchemy’ 19 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 795.
72. CROSS, SIR RUPERT (1995) Statutory Interpretation 3rd edn, (London, Butterworths).
73. CURRIE, JH (2001) Public International Law (Toronto, Irwin Law).
74. CURSON, H (1699) A Compendium Of The Laws and Government Ecclesiasitical, Civil and Military (London, Asssigns of Rich & Edw Atkins for J Walthoe).
75. DANIELS, RJ, MACKLIN, P, and ROACH, K (eds) (2001) The Security of Freedom: Essays on Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Bill (Toronto, University of Toronto Press).
76. DAVIS, KC (1969) Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry (Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University)
77. DAUSES, M (1985) ‘The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Community Legal Order’ European Law Review 398.
78. DE BRACTON, H (1968) De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae, SE Thorne (tr) (Cambridge, Mass, Belknap Press).
79. DE BÚRCA, G (1993) ‘The Principle of Proportionality and its Application in EC Law’ 13 Yearbook of European Law 105.
80. DE BÚRCA, G (1993) ‘Fundamental Human Rights and the Reach of EC law’ 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 283.
81. DE BÚRCA, G (1997) ‘The Role of Equality in European Community Law’ in S O’Leary and A Dashwood (eds), The Principle of Equal Treatment in EC Law (London, Sweet & Maxwell).
82. DE SMITH, SA (1960) The Lawyers and the Constitution (London, G Bell and Sons Ltd) 8 (published Inaugural Lecture at the University of London, London School of Economics, 10 May 1960).
83. DE SMITH (1995) in Woolf and Jowell, Judicial Review of Administrative Action 4th edn, (London, Sweet & Maxwell).
84. DE WITTE, B (1997). ‘The Past and Future Role of the European Court of Justice in the Protection of Human Rights’ in P Alston (ed), The EU and Human Rights (New York, Oxford University Press).
85. DE ZULUETA, F (tr) (1946) The Institutes of Gauis (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
86. DES ROSIERS N and FELDTHUSSEN, B (1992) ‘Discretion in Social Assistance Legislation’ Journal of Law & Social Policy 204.
87. DETRICK, S (comp & ed) (1992) The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Guide to the ‘Travaux Préparatoires’ (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).
88. DEVLIN, P (1966) Trial by Jury (London, Stevens).
89. DICEY, AV (1908) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution 7th edn (London, MacMillan & Co).
90. DOYLE, HON J (1999) ‘Accountability: Parliament, the Executive and the Judiciary’ in S Kneebone (ed), Administrative Law and the Rule of Law: Still Part of the Same Package? 1998 Administrative Law Forum (Canberra, AIAL).
91. DUGDALE, W (1671) Origines Juridiciales, Or Historical Memorials Of The English Laws, 2nd edn (Savoy, Tho Newcomb).
92. DWORKIN, R (1978) Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press).
93. DWORKIN, R (1986) Law’s Empire (Cambridge, Mass, Belknap Press).
94. DYZENHAUS, D (1997) ‘The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy’ in M Taggart (ed), The Province of Administrative Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
95. DWORKIN, R (1998) ‘Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik’s Conception of Legal Culture’ 14 South African Journal on Human Rights 11.
96. DWORKIN, R (1998) ‘Reuniting the Brain: The Democratic Basis of Judicial Review’ 9 Public Law Review 98.
97. DWORKIN, R (1999) (ed) Recrafting the Rule of Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
98. DWORKIN, R (2000) ‘Form and Substance in the Rule of Law: A Democratic Justification for Judicial Review?' in C FORSYTH (ed), Judicial Review and the Constitution (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
99. DYZENHAUS D and FOX-DECENT, E (2001) ‘Rethinking the Process/Substance Distinction: Baker v Canada’ 51 University of Toronto Law Journal 193.
100. DYZENHAUS D and TAGGART, M and HUNT, M (2001) ‘The Principle of Legality in Administrative Law: Internationalization as Constitutionalization’ 1 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 5.
101. DYZENHAUS D (2002) ‘Constituting the Rule of Law: Fundamental Values in Administrative Law’ 27 Queen’s Law Journal 445.
102. DYZENHAUS D (forthcoming) ‘Humpty Dumpty Rules or the Rule of Law: Legal Theory and the Adjudication of National Security’ Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy.
103. DYZENHAUS D (forthcoming) ‘The Justice of the Common Law: Judges, Democracy and the Limits of the Rule of Law’ in C SAUNDERS and K LE ROY (eds), Perspectives on the Rule of Law, (Sydney, Federation Press).
104. ELLIOT, M (1999) ‘The Demise of Parliamentary Sovereignty: The Implications for Justifying Judicial Review’, 115 Law Quarterly Review 119.
105. ELLIOT, M [1999] ‘The Ultra Vires Doctrine in a Constitutional Setting: Still the Central Principle of Administrative Law’ Cambridge Law Journal 129.
106. ELLIOT, M (2001) The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
107. ELLIS, E (ed) (1999) The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
108. EVANS, JM (1991) ‘The Principles of Fundamental Justice: The Constitution and The Common Law’ 29 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 51.
109. EVANS, JM and JANISCH, H, MULLAN, D, RISK, RCB (1995) Administrative Law: Cases, Text, and Materials 4th edn, (Toronto, Edmond Montgomery Publications Ltd).
110. EWING, K (1999) ‘The Human Rights Act 1998' 62 Modern Law Review 79.
111. EWING, K and GEARTY, C (1997) ‘Rocky Foundations for Labour’s New Rights’ European Human Rights Law Review 146.
112. FINN, P (1995) ‘The Forgotten “Trust”: The People and the State’ in M Cope (ed) Equity Issues and Trends, 1995 (The Foundation Press).
113. FLIKSCHUH, K (2000) Kant and Modern Political Philosophy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
114. FLYNN, L (1999) ‘The Implications of Article 13-After Amsterdam Will Some Forms of Discrimination be More Equal than Others?' 36 Common Market Law Review 1127.
115. FORSYTH, C [1996] ‘Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review’ Cambridge Law Journal 122.
116. FOX-DECENT, E (2003) ‘Sovereignty’s Promise: The State as Fiduciary’ (PhD thesis, Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto).
117. FRANKFURTER, F (1942) ‘The Final Report of the Attorney-General’s Committee on Administrative Procedure’ 42 Col LR 585.
118. FULLER, L (1969) The Morality of Law (New Haven, Yale University Press).
119. FULLER, L (1958) ‘Human Purpose and Natural Law’ 3 Natural Law Forum 68.
120. GALLIGAN, D (1986) Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
121. GALLIGAN, D (1996) Due Process and Fair Procedures: A Study of Administrative Procedures (Oxford, Clarendon Press)
122. GANZ, G (1987) Quasi-Legislation: Recent Developments in Secondary Legislation (London, Sweet & Maxwell).
123. GEARTY, C (2002) ‘Reconciling Parliamentary Democracy and Human Rights’ 118 Law Quarterly Review 248.
124. GIERKE, O (1958) Political Theories of the Middle Ages, FW Maitland (tr) (Boston, Beacon Hill Press).
125. GILLIS, C ‘Mother in battle over deportation legally a resident’, National Post 22 December 2001.
126. GLEESON, HON M (2000) The Rule of Law and the Constitution Boyer Lectures 2000 (Sydney, ABC Books).
127. GLENN, P (1987) ‘Persuasive Authority’ 32 McGill Law Journal 262.
128. GOUGH, GW (1955) Fundamental Law in English Constitutional History (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
129. GRAHAM, CB and HAYS, SW (1986) ‘Citizen Access and the Control of Administrative Discretion’ in DH Shumavon and HK Hibbeln (ed), Administrative Discretion and Public Policy Implementation (New York, Praeger Publishing).
130. GRAZIADEI, M (1993) ‘Changing Images of the Law in XIX Century English Legal Thought (The Continental Impulse)' in M Reimann (ed), The Reception of Continental Ideas in the Common Law World 1820-1920 (Berlin, Duncker & Humblot).
131. GRIFFITHS, JAG (1977) The Politics of the Judiciary (London, Penguin Books).
132. GRIFFITHS, JAG (1985) ‘Judicial Decision-Making in Public Law’ Public Law 564.
133. GROTIUS, H [1646] De jure belli ac pacis libri tres 2 Volumes, Volume II: FW Kelsey (trs) (Washington, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1913 (Volume I) 1925 (Volume II)).
134. HABERMAS, J (1997) ‘Kant’s Idea of Perpetual Peace, with the Benefit of Two Hundred Years’ Hindsight’ in J Bohman and M Lutz-Bachman (eds), Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal (Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press).
135. HAHN, RK (1988) ‘The British Influence on the Initiation and Introduction of Commonwealth Bill of Rights’ 26 Journal of Commonwealth Comparative Politics 54.
136. HALLIDAY, S (2000) ‘The Influence of Judicial Review on Bureaucratic Decision-Making’ Public Law 110.
137. HAMMOND (1998) ‘Judicial Review: the continuing interplay between law and policy’ Public Law 34.
138. HANDLER, J (1988) ‘Dependent People, the State and the Modern/Postmodern Search for the Dialogic Community’ 35 UCLA Law Review 999.
139. HARLOW, C (1995) ‘A Special Relationship? American Influences on Judicial Review in England’ in I Loveland (ed)A Special Relationship? American Influences on Public Law in the UK (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
140. HARRINGTON, J (2002) ‘The Year in Review: Developments in International Law and Its Application in Canada’ (Presentation to the Canadian Bar Association Conference on Directions in International Law and Practice, Ottawa, 30 March 2002) at 8 [unpublished, on file with authors].
141. HARVEY, C (2000) Seeking Asylum in the UK: Problems and Prospects (London, Butterworths).
142. HAWKINS, K (1992) ‘The Uses of Legal Discretion: Perspectives from Law and Social Science’ in K Hawkins (ed), The Uses of Discretion (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
143. HAWKINS, RE (1983) ‘Making Section 1 Work’ in The Law Society of Upper Canada, Charter of Rights and Administrative Law 1983-1984 (Toronto, Carswell).
144. HEDLEY, S (1995) ‘Words, Words, Words: Making Sense of Legal Judgments, 1875-1940' in C Stebbings (ed), Law Reporting in Britain (London, The Hambledon Press) 169.
145. HELD, D (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Cambridge, Polity Press).
146. HELD, D (2002) ‘Law of States, Law of Peoples: Three Models of Sovereignty’ 8 Legal Theory 1.
147. HELMHOLZ, H (1999) ‘Magna Carta and Ius Commune’ 66 University of Chicago Law Review 297.
148. HEYDON, HON JD (2003) ‘Judicial Activism and the Death of the Rule of Law’ 47 Quadrant 9.
149. HIEBERT, J (1991) Determining the Limits of Charter Rights: How Much Discretion do Governments Retain (Toronto, Ph.D. Dissertation).
150. HO, HL (2000) ‘The judicial duty to give reasons’ 20 Legal Studies 42.
151. HOBBES, T [1681] A Dialogue Between A Philosopher and A Student of The Common Laws of England, J Cropsey (ed) (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1971).
152. HOGG, P and BUSHELL, A (1997) ‘The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn’t Such a Bad Thing After All)' 35 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 75.
153. HOULE, F (2001) ‘La zone fictive de l’infra-droit: l’integration des regles administratives dans la categorie des texts reglementaires’ (2001) 47 McGill Law Journal 161.
154. HOULE, F (2002) ‘L’arrêt Baker: Le rôle des règles administratives dans la réception du droit international des droits de la personne en droit interne’ 28 Queen’s Law Journal 511.
155. HUNT M (1998) Using Human Rights Law in English Courts (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
156. HUNT M (forthcoming) ‘Sovereignty’s Blight: Why Contemporary Public Law Needs the Concept of “Due Deference”' in N Bamforth and P Leyland (eds), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
157. JACKSON, KT (1993) ‘Global Rights and Regional Jurisprudence’ 12 Law & Philosophy 157.
158. JACOBS, F and WHITE, R (1996) The European Convention on Human Rights 2nd edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
159. JANIS, MW (1984) ‘Jeremy Bentham and the Fashioning of “International Law”' 78 American Journal of International Law 405.
160. JANISCH, HN (1992) ‘The Choice of Decision-Making Method: Adjudication, Policies, and Rule-Making’ in Administrative Law: Principles, Practices, and Pluralism, Special Lectures of the Law Society of Upper Canada (Scarborough, Carswell)
161. JANISCH, HN and MULLAN DJ and RISK, RCB (1995) Administrative Law-Cases, Text and Materials, 4th edn (Toronto, Emond Montgomery Publications).
162. JANISCH, HN and SMITH, E (1995) Administrative Law Supplement, a supplement to Administrative Law-Cases, Text and Materials, 4th edn (Toronto, Emond Montgomery Publications)
163. JOSEPH, P (2002) Constitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand 2nd edn (Wellington, Brookers).
164. JOWELL, JL ‘Is Equality a Constitutional Principle?' (1994) 47 Current Legal Problems 1.
165. JOWELL, JL(1999) ‘Of Vires and Vacuums: The Constitutional Context of Judicial Review’ Public Law 448.
166. JOWELL, JL and LESTER, A (1987) ‘Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law’ Public Law 368.
167. KANT, I [1795] ‘Toward Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Project’ in MJ Gregor (tr and ed), Practical Philosophy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996).
168. KANT, I The Metaphysics of Morals, in MJ Gregor (tr and ed) Practical Philosophy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996).
169. KANT, I Groundwork of The Metaphysics of Morals, in MJ Gregor (tr and ed) Practical Philosophy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996).
170. KANT, I Theory and Practice, in MJ Gregor (tr and ed) Practical Philosophy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996).
171. KELLEY, K and TREBILCOCK, M (1998) The Making of the Mosaic: A History of Canadian Immigration Policy (Toronto, University of Toronto Press).
172. KELLY, J (1999) ‘Bureaucratic Activism and the Charter of Rights: The Department of Justice and its entry into the Centre of Government’ 42 Canadian Public Administration 476.
173. KERANS, RP (1994) Standards of Review Employed by Appellate Courts (Edmonton, Juriliber).
174. KINDRED, HM (2002) ‘The Use of Unimplemented Treaties in Canada: Practice and Prospects in the Supreme Court’ in C Carmody et al (eds), Trilateral Perspectives on International Legal Issues: Conflict and Coherence [forthcoming in 2002] [manuscript on file with the authors; page references to manuscript].
175. KIRBY, M (1986) ‘Accountability and the Right to Reasons’ in M Taggart (ed, Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the 1980s: Problem and Prospects (Auckland, Oxford University Press).
176. KIRBY, M (1994) ‘Reasons for Judgment: “Always Permissible, Usually Desirable and Often Obligatory”' 12 Australian Bar Review 121.
177. KLATER, CE (1994) ‘The Americanization of Blackstone’s Commentaries’ in EA Cawthorn & DE Narrett (eds), Essays on English Law and the American Experience (Texas, Texas A & M University Press).
178. KNOP, K (2000) ‘Here and There: International Law in Domestic Courts’ 32 New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 507.
179. KOH, HH (1988) ‘Bringing International Law Home’ 35 Houston Law Review 623.
180. KOH, HH (1997) ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?' 106 Yale Law Journal 2599.
181. KOSKENNIEMI, M (2002) The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870-1960 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
182. KUNKEL, W (1966) An Introduction to Roman Legal and Constitutional History (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
183. KUPER, A (2000) ‘Rawlsian Global Justice: Beyond The Law of Peoples to a Cosmopolitan Law of Persons’ 28 Political Theory 640.
184. LAFOREST, GV (1988) ‘The Use of International and Foreign Materials in the Supreme Court of Canada’ 17 Canadian Council of International Lawyers Proceedings 230.
185. LAFOREST, GV (1996) ‘The Expanding Role of the Supreme Court of Canada in International Law Issues’ 34 Canadian Yeabook of International Law 89.
186. LANDAUER, C (2002) ‘From Status to Treaty: Henry Summer Maine’s International Law’ 15 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 219.
187. LAUTERPACHT, H (1939) ‘Is International Law a Part of the Law of England?' 25 Transactions of the Grotius Society 51.
188. LAWS, J (1998) ‘Wednesbury’, in C Forsyth and I Hare, The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays on Public Law in Honour of Sir William Wade (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
189. LEBEL, L and CHAO, G (2002) ‘The Rise of International Law in Canadian Constitutional Litigation: Fugue or Fusion? Recent Developments and Challenges in Internalizing International Law’ (Fifth Annual Analysis of the Constitutional Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada, Osgoode Hall Law School, 12 April 2002) at 6 [unpublished, on file with authors].
190. LEIGH, I (2002) ‘Taking Rights Proportionately: Judicial Review, the Human Rights Act and Strasbourg’ Public Law 265.
191. LENAERTS, K (1991) ‘Fundamental Rights to be Included in a Community Catalogue’16 European Law Review 367.
192. LE SUEUR, AP (1999) ‘Legal Duties To Give Reasons’ 52 Current Legal Problems 150.
193. L’HEUREUX-DUBÉ (1998) ‘The Importance of Dialogue: Globalisation and the International Impact of the Rehnquist Court’ 34 Tulsa Law Journal 15.
194. L’HEUREUX-DUBÉ (2001) ‘From Many Different Stones: A House of Justice’, Notes for an Address to the International Association of Women Judges, Montreal 10 Nov 2001.
195. LIPSKY, M (1980) Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).
196. LOWE, V (2000) ‘The Politics of Law-Making: Are the Method and Character of Norm Creation Changing?' in M Byers (ed), The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law (New York, Oxford University Press).
197. MACDONALD, RA (1980) ‘Judicial Review and Procedural Fairness in Administrative Law: I’ McGill Law Journal 520.
198. MACDONALD, RA and LAMETTI, D (1990) ‘Reasons for Decisions in Administrative Law’ 3 Canadian Journal of Law and Administrative Practice 123.
199. MACDONALD, RA (1998) ‘Metaphors of Multiplicity: Civil Society, Regimes and Legal Pluralism’ (1998) 15 Arizona Journal of Comparative and International Law 69.
200. MACDONALD, R St J (1974) ‘The Relationship between International Law and Domestic Law in Canada’ in R St J Macdonald, G Morris and DM Johnston (eds), Canadian Perspectives on International Law and Organization (Toronto, University of Toronto Press).
201. MACKINTOSH, J (1934) Roman Law in Modern Practice (Edinburgh, W Green & Son).
202. MACKINTOSH, J (1799) A Discourse on the Study of the Law of Nature and Nations (London, J Debrett & W Clarke).
203. MAINE, HS (1888) International Law: A Series of Lectures Delivered Before the University of Cambridge, 1887 (New York, H Holt).
204. MAINE, HS (1905) Ancient Law (London, John Murray).
205. MARKESINIS, BS (1997) The German Law of Obligations 3rd edn (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
206. MASHAW, J (1985) Due Process in the Administrative State (New Haven, Conn, Yale University Press).
207. MASON, K (1995) ‘The Rule of Law’ in P Finn (ed), Essays on Law and Government Vol 1 Principles and Values (Sydney, Law Book Co).
208. MCGOLDRICK, D (1991) ‘The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child’ 5 International Journal of Law and the Family 132.
209. MCLACHLIN, B (1999) ‘The Role of Administrative Tribunals and Courts in Maintaining the Rule of Law’ 12 Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practice 171.
210. MILSOM, SFC (1985) Studies in the History of the Common Law (London, The Hambledon Press).
211. MORAN, M (2001) ‘An Uncivil Action: The Tort of Torture and Cosmopolitan Private Law’ in C Scott (ed), The Tort of Torture (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
212. MORAN, M (2003) Rethinking the Reasonable Person: An Egalitarian Reconstruction of the Objective Standard (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
213. MORRIS, MH (1998) ‘Administrative Decision-makers and the Duty to Give Reasons: An Emerging Debate’ 11 Canadian Journal of Law and Administrative Practice 155.
214. MULLAN, D (1999) ‘Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)-A Defining Moment in Canadian Immigration Law’ 7 Reid’s Administrative Law 145;
215. MULLAN, D (2000) ‘The Role of the Judiciary in the Review of Administrative Policy Decisions: Issues of Legality’ Mossman and Otis (eds), The Judiciary as Third Branch of Government: Manifestations and Challenges to Legitimacy (Montréal, Les Éditions Thémis).
216. MULLAN, D (2001) ‘The Supreme Court of Canada and Tribunals-Deference to the Administrative Process: A Recent Phenomenon or a Return to Basics?' 80 Canadian Bar Review 399.
217. MULLAN, D (2001) Administrative Law (Toronto, Irwin Law).
218. NANDA, VP (2001) ‘Self-Determination and Secession Under International Law’ 29 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 305.
219. NEUWAHL, N and ROSAS, R (eds) (1995) The European Union and Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; The Hague, Kluwer Law International).
220. NEDELSKY, J (1997) ‘Embodied Diversity and the Challenges to Law’ 42 McGill Law Journal 91.
221. NUSSBAUM, M (1997) ‘Kant and Cosmopolitanism’, in J Bohman and M Lutz-Bachman (eds), Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal (Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press).
222. O’LEARY, S (1995) ‘The Relationship between Community Citizenship and the Protection of Fundamental Rights in Community Law’ 32 Common Market Law Review 519.
223. O’LEARY, S and DASHWOOD, A (ed) (1977), The Principle of Equal Treatment in EC Law (London, Sweet & Maxwell).
224. OLIVER, D (1987) ‘Is the Ultra Vires Rule the Basis of Judicial Review?' Public Law 543.
225. OLIVER, D (1999) Common Values and the Public-Private Divide (London, Butterworths).
226. OPIE, I and P (eds) (1951) The Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
227. PEERS, S (2002) ‘The New Regulation on Access to Documents: A Critical Analysis’ 21 Yearbook of European Law.
228. PENNINGTON, K (1993) The Prince and the Law, 1200-1600: Sovereignty and Rights in the Western Legal Tradition (Berkeley, University of California Press).
229. PERRY, S (1987) ‘Judicial Obligation, Precedent and the Common Law’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 215.
230. PHELAN, D (1992) ‘Right to Life of the Unborn v Promotion of Trade in Services: The European Court of Justice and the Normative Shaping of the European Union’ 55 Modern Law Review 670.
231. PLAXTON, MC (2002) ‘Thinking about Appeals, Authority, and Judicial Power after R v Sheppard’ 47 Criminal Law Quarterly 59.
232. PLUCKNETT, TFT and BARTON, JL (eds) (1974) St. German’s Doctor and Student (London, Selden Society)
233. PUFENDORF, S [1688] De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo, 2 Volumes, Volume II: CH Oldfather and WA Oldfather (trs) (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1934).
234. RAWLS, J (1993) Political Liberalism (New York, Columbia University Press).
235. RAWLS, J (1999) The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press).
236. RAZ, J (1977) ‘The Rule of Law and its Virtues’ 93 Law Quarterly Review 195.
237. RAZ, J (1979) The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
238. RAZ, J (1990) ‘The Politics of the Rule of Law’ 3 Ratio Juris 331.
239. RICHARDSON, G and MACHIN, D (2000) ‘Judicial Review and Tribunal Decision-Making: A Study of the Mental Health Review Tribunal’ Public Law 494.
240. RICHARDSON, H (1999) ‘Administrative Policy-Making: Rule of Law or Bureaucracy?' in D Dyzenhaus (ed), Recrafting the Rule of Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
241. RISHWORTH, P, HUSCROFT, G, OPTICAN, S, and MAHONEY, R (2003) The New Zealand Bill of Rights (Melbourne, Oxford University Press).
242. RISK, RCB and POND, RC (1996) ‘Rights Talk in Canada in the Late Nineteenth Century: The Good Sense and Right Feeling of the People’ 14 Law and History Review 1.
243. ROACH, K (2001) ‘Constitutional and Common Law Dialogues Between the Supreme Court and Canadian Legislatures’ 80 Canadian Bar Review 481.
244. ROACH, K (2001) The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism and Democratic Dialogue (Toronto, Irwin Law).
245. ROBSON, P (1998) ‘Judicial Review and Social Security’ in T Buck (ed), Judicial Review and Social Welfare (London, Pinter).
246. SANDARS, TC (tr) (1874) The Institutes of Justinian (London, Longmans, Green & Co).
247. SANTOS, B (1995) Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition (London, Routledge).
248. SCHABAS, WA (2000) ‘Twenty-five Years of Public International Law at the Supreme Court of Canada’ 79 Canadian Bar Review 174.
249. SCHEININ, M (unpublished 2002) ‘The Human Rights Committee’s Pronouncements on the Right to an Effective Remedy-an Illustration of the Legal Nature of the Committee’s Work under the Optional Protocol’
250. SCHWARZE, J (1992) European Administrative Law (London, Sweet & Maxwell).
251. SEDLEY, S (1995) ‘Human Rights: a Twenty-Frist Century Agenda’, Public Law 386.
252. SCHWARZE, J (1994) ‘Sounds of Silence: Constitutional Law Without A Constitution’ 110 Law Quarterly Review 270.
253. SHAPIRO, M (1992) ‘The Giving Reasons Requirement’ The University of Chicago Legal Forum 179.
254. SHAPIRO, S and LEVY, R (1987) ‘Heightened Scrutiny of the Fourth Branch: Separation of Powers and the Requirement of Adequate Reasons for Agency Decisions’ Duke Law Journal 387.
255. SHARPE, RJ (1995) The Law of Habeas Corpus 2nd edn (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
256. SHARPE, RJ (2001) review of D Clark and G McCoy, The Most Fundamental Legal Right: Habeas Corpus and the Commonwealth, 1 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 287.
257. SHELTON, D (2002) ‘Hierarchy of Norms and Human Rights: Of Trumps and Winners’ 65 Saskatchewan Law Review 301.
258. SHILTON, E (1993) ‘Charter Litigation and the Policy Processes of Government: A Public Interest Account’ in P Monahan and M Finkelstein (eds), The Impact of the Charter on the Public Policy Process (North York, On, York University Centre for Public Law and Public Policy).
259. SIMON, W ‘Legality, Bureaucracy and Class in the Welfare System’ 92 Yale Law Journal 1198.
260. SIMPSON, AWB (1973) ‘The Common Law and Legal Theory’ in Simpson (ed) Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence 2nd series, (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
261. SIMPSON, AWB (2001) Human Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of the European Convention (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
262. SIMPSON, AWB (1992) In the Highest Degree Odious: Detention Without Trial in Wartime Britain (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
263. SOSSIN, L (1992) ‘The Politics of Discretion: Toward a Critical Theory of Public Administration’ 36 Canadian Public Administration 364.
264. SOSSIN, L (1994) ‘Redistributing Democracy: Authority, Discretion and the Possibility of Engagement in the Welfare State’ 26 Ottawa Law Review 1.
265. SOSSIN, L (2000) ‘Developments in Administrative Law: The 1997-98 and 1998-99 Terms’, 11 Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 37.
266. SOSSIN, L (2001) ‘Regulating Virtue: A Purposive Approach to the Administration of Charities in Canada’ in J Phillips, et al (eds), Charities: Between State and Market (Kingston, McGill-Queen’s Press).
267. SOSSIN, L (2002) ‘An Intimate Approach to Fairness, Impartiality and Reasonableness in Administrative Law’ 27 Queen’s Law Journal 809.
268. SOSSIN, L (2002) ‘Law and Intimacy in the Bureaucrat-Citizen Relationship’ in N des Rosiers (ed), No Person is an Island: Personal Relationships of Dependence and Independence (Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press).
269. SOSSIN, L (2002) ‘The Politics of Soft Law: How Judicial Decisions Influence Bureaucratic Discretion in Canada’ paper presented to the Tilburg Workshop on Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact.
270. SOSSIN, L (2003) ‘Public Fiduciary Obligations, Political Trusts and the Evolving Duty of Reasonableness in Administrative Law’ 66 Saskatchewan Law Review 101.
271. SOSSIN, L ‘Discretion Unbound: Reconciling Soft Law and the Charter’ (2002) 45 Canadian Public Administration (forthcoming).
272. SOSSIN L and BRYANT, M (2002) Public Law (Toronto, Carswell).
273. SOSSIN L and SMITH, C (2003) ‘Hard Choices and Soft Law: Ethical Codes, Policy Guidelines and the Role of the Courts in Regulating Government’ 40 Alberta Law Review (forthcoming).
274. SPIELMANN, D (1999) ‘Human Rights Case Law in the Strasbourg and Luxembourg Courts: Conflicts, Inconsistencies and Complementarities’ in P Alston (ed), The EU and Human Rights (New York, Oxford University Press).
275. SPIRO, PJ (2000) ‘Globalization, International Law, and the Academy’ 32 New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 567.
276. SPRAGUE, JLH (1999) ‘Another View of Baker’, 7 Reid’s Administrative Law 163.
277. SPRAGUE, JLH (2000) ‘Remedies for the Failure to Provide Reasons’ 13 Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practice 209.
278. STERETT, S (1997) Creating Constitutionalism? The Politics of Legal Expertise and Administrative Law in England and Wales (Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press).
279. STUART, MACKENZIE LORD. (1977) The European Communities and the Rule of Law (London, Stevens).
280. SULLIVAN, R (1994) Driedger on the Construction of Statutes 3rd edn (Markham, Butterworths).
281. SUNKIN, M (2002) ‘Methodological and Conceptual Issues in Researching the Impact of Judicial Review on Government Bureaucracies’ (paper presented to Tilburg Workshop on Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact).
282. SUNKIN, M and PICK, K (2001) ‘The Changing Impact of Judicial Review’ Public Law 736.
283. TAGGART, M (1983) ‘Should Canadian Judges Be Legally Required To Give Reasoned Decisions in Civil Cases’ 33 University of Toronto Law Journal 1.
284. SUNKIN, M and PICK, K (1986) (ed) Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the 1980s: Problems and Prospects (Auckland, Oxford University Press).
285. SUNKIN, M and PICK, K (1988) ‘Expropriation, Public Purpose and the Constitution’ in C Forsyth and I Hare (eds), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays in Public Law in Honour of Sir William Wade QC (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
286. SUNKIN, M and PICK, K (1992) ‘The Rationalisation of Administrative Tribunal Procedure: The New Zealand Experience’ in R Creyke (ed), Administrative Tribunals: Taking Stock (Australian National University, Canberra, Centre for International & Public Law).
287. SUNKIN, M and PICK, K (1996) ‘Outside Canadian Administrative Law’ 46 University of Toronto Law Journal 649.
288. SUNKIN, M and PICK, K (1996) ‘Legitimate Expectations and Treaties in the High Court of Australia’ 112 Law Quarterly Review 50.
289. SUNKIN, M and PICK, K (1997) ‘The Contribution of Lord Cooke to Scope of Review Doctrine in Administrative Law: A Comparative Common Law Perspective’ in P Rishworth (ed), The Struggle for Simplicity in Law: Essays for Lord Cooke of Thorndon (Wellington, Butterworths).
290. SUNKIN, M and PICK, K (2002) Private Property and Abuse of Rights in Victorian England: The Story of Edward Pickles and the Bradford Water Supply (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
291. SUNKIN, M and PICK, K (2003) ‘The Nature of the State’ in P Cane and M Tushnet (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
292. SUNKIN, M and PICK, K (2003) ‘Reinventing Administrative Law’ in N Bamforth and P Leyland (eds), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
293. TAYLOR, C (1985) ‘What’s wrong with negative liberty’ in Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2 211.
294. TAYLOR, GDS (1991) Judicial Review: A New Zealand Perspective (Wellington, Butterworths).
295. TOOHEY (1993) ‘A Government of Laws, Not Men?' 4 Public Law Review 159.
296. TOOPE, S (1998) ‘Canada and International Law’ 27 Canadian Council of International Lawyers Proceedings 33.
297. TOOPE, S (1999) Case Comment on Quebec Secession Reference 5 American Journal of International Law 519.
298. TOOPE, S (2001) ‘The Uses of Metaphor: International Law and the Supreme Court of Canada’ 80 Canadian Bar Review 534.
299. TOOPE, S (2001) ‘Inside and Out: The Stories of International Law and Domestic Law’ 50 University of Brunswick Law Journal 11
300. TREMBLAY, LB (1984) ‘Section 7 of the Charter: Substantive Due Process?' 18 University of British Columbia Law Review 201.
301. TRIDIMAS, T (1999) The General Principles of EC Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
302. TROUWBORST, A (2002) Evolution and Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law (Boston, Kluwer Law International).
303. TUBBS, JW (2000) The Common Law Mind: Medieval and Early Modern Conceptions (Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press).
304. TUCK, R (1979) Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
305. TULLY, J (2000) ‘The Unattained Yet Attainable Democracy: Canada and Quebec Face the New Century’ (Montreal, Programme d’études sur le Québec de L’Université McGill).
306. TUSHNET, M (1999) ‘The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law’ 108 Yale Law Journal 1225.
307. TWINING, W (2000) Globalization and Legal Theory (Evanston, Northwestern University Press).
308. TWOMEY, P (1994) ‘The European Union: Three Pillars without a Human Rights Foundation’ in D O’Keeffe and P Twomey (eds), Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty (London, Chancery Law).
309. VAJDA, C (1979) ‘Some Aspects of Judicial Review within the Common Agricultural Policy-Part II’ 4 European Law Review 341.
310. VAN DIJK, P and VAN HOOF, G (1998) Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd edn (Netherlands, Kluwer).
311. VAN ERT, G (2000) ‘Using Treaties in Canadian Courts’ 38 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 3.
312. VAN ERT, G (2002) Using International Law in Canadian Courts (The Hague, Kluwer Law International).
313. VINING, J (1986) The Authoritative and the Authoritarian (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
314. VINING, J (1991) ‘Authority and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Deference’ 43 Admin Law Review 135.
315. VITORINO, A (2001) The Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Foundation for the Area of Freedom, Justice and Security (Centre for European Legal Studies, Exeter Paper in European Law, No 4).
316. VON BOGDANY (2000) ‘The European Union as a Human Rights Organization? Human Rights and the Core of the European Union’ 37 Common Market Law Review 1307.
317. WADE, HWR and FORSYTH, C (2000) Administrative Law 8th edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
318. WADHAM, J (2001) ‘The Human Rights Act: One Year On’ European Human Rights Law Review 620.
319. WALDRON, J (2002) ‘Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida)' 21 Law and Philosophy 137.
320. WALTERS, M (2001) ‘The Common Law Constitution in Canada: Return of Lex Non Scripta as Fundamental Law’ 51 University of Toronto Law Journal 91.
321. WEILER, J (1992)? ‘Thou Shalt not Oppress a Stranger: On the Judicial Protection of the Human Rights of Non-Community Nationals-a Critique’ European Journal of International 65.
322. WEILER J and LOCKHART, N (1995) '“Taking Rights Seriously” Seriously: The European Court and its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence’ 32 Common Market Law Review 51.
323. WEILER J and FRIES, S (1999) ‘A Human Rights Policy for the European Community and Union: The Question of Competences’ in P Alston (ed), The EU and Human Rights (New York, Oxford University Press).
324. WEINRIB, LE (2000) ‘The Supreme Court of Canada in the Age of Rights’ 80 Canadian Bar Review 200.
325. WEINRIB LE and WEINRIB, EJ (2001) ‘Constitutional Values and Private Law in Canada’ in D Friedmann and D Barak-Erez (eds), Human Rights in Private Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
326. WEISER, I (1998) ‘Effect in Domestic Law of International Human Rights Treaties Ratified Without Implementing Legislation’ 27 Canadian Council of International Lawyers Proceedings 132.
327. WEISER, I (2002) ‘Undressing the Window: A Proposal for Making International Human Rights Law Meaningful in the Canadian Commonwealth System’ (September 2002; on file with authors).
328. WEST, CC (1991) ‘England: ancient constitution and common law’ in JH Burns (ed), The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
329. WEXLER, S (1981) ‘The Forms of Action and Administrative Law’ in Proceedings of the Administrative Law Conference, Faculty of Law, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, 18-19 October 1979 292.
330. WOOD, T (1712) A New Institute of the Imperial or Civil Law (London, WB for Richard Sare).