CHALLENGES FACING CROSSOVER YOUTH: AN EXAMINATION OF JUVENILE-JUSTICE DECISION MAKING AND RECIDIVISM

Family Court Review

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 305-321

  Herz, Denise C ^a   Ryan, Joseph P ^b   Bilchik, Shay ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c Master of Public Policy   (United States)

Author keywords

child welfare; crossover youth; dual jurisdiction youth; dually involved youth; juvenile justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84455175446     PISSN: 15312445     EISSN: 17441617     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01312.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Altschuler, D., Strangler, G., Berkeley, K., & Burton, L. (2009). Supporting youth in transition to adulthood: Lessons learned from child welfare and juvenile justice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, Center for Juvenile Justice Reform and Casey Family Programs.
2. Conger, D., & Ross, T. (2001). Reducing the foster care bias in juvenile detention decisions: The impact of project confirm. New York: Administration for Children's Services, The Vera Institute of Justice.
3. Cusick, G. R., Goerge, R. M., & Bell, K. C. (2009). From corrections to community: The juvenile reentry experience as characterized by multiple systems involvement. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall Center for Children at University of Chicago.
4. Dunlap, B. (2006). Dependents who become delinquents: Implementing dual jurisdiction in California under assembly bill 129. Whittier Journal of Child and Family Advocacy, 507, 1–43.
5. Halemba, G., & Lord, R. (2005). Effectively intervening with dual jurisdiction youth in Ohio. Children, Families, and the Courts, Ohio Bulletin, 2, 1–28.
6. Halemba, G. J., Siegel, G., Lord, R. D., & Zawacki, S. (2004, November 30). Arizona dual jurisdiction study: Final report. Pittsburg, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
7. Herz, D. (in press). Crossover youth research summary. In L. Lutz & M. Stewart (Eds.), Crossover youth practice model (App. A), Washington, DC: Georgetown University Public Policy Institute, Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.
8. Herz, D. C., & Ryan, J. P. (2008a). Bridging two worlds: Youth involved in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems, A policy guide for improving outcomes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Public Policy Institute, Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.
9. Herz, D. C., & Ryan, J. P. (2008b). Exploring the characteristics and outcomes of 241.1 youths in Los Angeles County. San Francisco: California Courts, The Administrative Office of the Courts.
10. Herz, D. C., Krinsky, M., & Ryan, J. (2006). Improving system responses to crossover youth: The role of research and practice partnership. The Link, 1–12.
11. Jonson-Reid, M., & Barth, R. P. (2000). From maltreatment report to juvenile incarceration: The role of child welfare services. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 505–520.
12. Jonson-Reid, M., & Barth, R. (2003). Probation foster care as an outcome for children exiting child welfare foster care. Social Work, 48, 348–361.
13. Kelley, B. T., Thornberry, T., & Smith, C. (1997). In the wake of child maltreatment. Washington, DC: OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin.
14. Kempf-Leonard, K. (2007). Minority youths and juvenile justice: Disproportionate Minority Contact after nearly 20 years of reform efforts. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 71–87.
15. Krinsky, M. A. (2004, March 29). Los Angeles Daily Journal.
16. Morris, L., & Freundlich, M. (2004). Youth involvement in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems: A case of double jeopardy? Washington, DC: CWLA Press.
17. Pope, C., Lovell, R., & Hsia, H. (2002). Disproportionate minority contact: A review of the research literature from 1989 through 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
18. Ryan, J. P. (2006). Dependent Youth in juvenile justice: Do positive peer culture programs work for victims of child maltreatment? Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 511–519.
19. Ryan, J. P., Herz, D., Hernandez, P., & Marshall, J. (2007). Maltreatment and delinquency: Investigating child welfare bias in juvenile justice processing. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 1035–1050.
20. Ryan, J. P., Marshall, J. M., Herz, D., & Hernandez, P. (2008). Juvenile delinquency in child welfare: Investigating group home effects. Children and Youth Services Review.
21. Ryan, J. P., & Testa, M. K. (2005). Child maltreatment and juvenile delinquency: Investigating the role of placement and placement instability. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 227–249.
22. Siegel, G., & Lord, R. (2004) When system collide: Improving court practices and programs in dual jurisdiction cases. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
23. Smith, C., & Thornberry, T. P. (1995). The relationship between childhood maltreatment and adolescent involvement in delinquency. Criminology, 33, 451–481.
24. Stewart, A., Dennison, S., & Waterson, E. (2002). Pathways from child maltreatment to juvenile offending. Criminology Research Council, Final Report.
25. Thornberry, T., & Krohn, M. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice (Vol. 4, pp. 33–83). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
26. Welfare and Institutions Code § 241.1. (1997).
27. Widom, C. S. (1989). Child abuse, neglect, and violent criminal behavior. Criminology, 27, 251–271.
28. Wiig, J., & Tuell, J. A. (2007). Los Angeles County AB 129/Systems Integration Initiative report. Washington, DC: Child Welfare of America.
29. Yoo, J., & Sosna, T. (2007). LARRC risk level categories: Rationale for cutoff scores. Los Angeles: Probation Department.
30. Zingraff, M., Leiter, J., Myers, K., & Johnsen, M. (1993). Child maltreatment and youthful problem behavior. Criminology, 31, 173–202.