Formulation and evaluation of montelukast sodium mucoadhesive buccal patches for chronic asthma attacks

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Raghavendra Rao, N G ^a   Suryakar, V B ^a  

^a Luqman College of Pharmacy   (India)

Author keywords

Buccal patch; Eudragit RL 100; In vitro release; Montelukast sodium; Physical properties; PVP

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; EUDRAGIT; HYDROXYETHYLCELLULOSE; MONTELUKAST; POLYMER; POVIDONE IODINE; PROPYLENE GLYCOL;

ARTICLE; ASTHMA; BURSTING STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG BIOAVAILABILITY; DRUG CONTENT UNIFORMITY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG DETERMINATION; DRUG DOSAGE FORM; DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPARISON; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG HALF LIFE; DRUG RELEASE; EXCIPIENT COMPATIBILITY; FOLDING ENDURANCE; IN VITRO STUDY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MEAN RESIDENCE TIME; MUCOADHESIVE BUCCAL PATCH; PHYSICAL APPEARANCE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; SURFACE PH; SURFACE TEXTURE; SWELING INDEX; THICKNESS; WEIGHT UNIFORMITY;

EID: 84455169019     PISSN: None     EISSN: 09756299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. R. Anders, H.P. Merkle. Evaluation of laminated mucoadhesive patches for buccal drug delivery. Int J Pharm1989;49: 240.
2. W.G. Chem, G. Hwang. Adhesive and in vitro release characteristics of proponolol Bioadhesive disc system. Int J Pharm1992; 82:61-66.
3. H.H. Alur, S.I. Pather, A.K. Mitra. Transdermal sustained delivery of chlopheniramine maleate in rabbits using a novel natural mucoadhesive gum as excipients in buccal tablets. Int J Pharm1999; 188:1-10.
4. J.H. Guo. Bioadhesive polymer buccal patches for buprenorphine controlled delivery formulation in vitro adhesion and release properties. Drug Dev Ind. Pharm1994; 20: 2809-2821.
5. A. Ahuja, M. Dorga, S.P. Agrawal. Development of buccal tablets of diltiazem HCL. Indian J Pharm Sci.1995; 57: 26-30.
6. T. Nagai, R. Koshini. Buccal/gingival drug delivery systems. J Control release1987; 6: 353-360.
7. D. Harris, J.R. Robinson. Drug delivery via the mucous membrane of the oral cavity. J. Phram Sci 1992; 81(1): 234.
8. R. Khanna, S.P. Agarwal, A. Ahuja. Mucoadhesive buccal drug delivery: A potential alternative to conventional therapy. Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 1998; 60 (1):1-11.
9. K.P.R. Chowdary, G. Sundari Balatripura. Design and Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Controlled Release Oral Tablets of Glipizide. Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 2003, 65(6): 591-594.
10. G.V.P. Kumar, R.V. Krishna, G.J. William, A. Konde. Formulation and evaluation of buccal films of salbutamol sulphate. Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 2005; 67(2): 160-164.
11. S. Saisivam, M.H. Mohammed Ashreff, N.S. Maria Gerals, S. Rajan, Jayprakash, M. Nagarajan. Design and evaluation of diltiazem hydrochloride buccal patches. Indian J. Pharm. Sci., May-June 2000: 236-238.
12. R. Hango, S. Kavimani, A.R. Mullaicharam, B. Jayakar. In vitro studies on buccal strips of glibenclamide using chitosan. Indian J. Pharm, Sci., 1997; 59: 232-235.
13. S.C, Shin, J.P, Bum, J.S. Choi. Enhanced bioavailability by buccal administration of trimcinolone acetonide from the Bioadhesive gels in rabbits. Int J Pharm 2000; 209: 37-43.
14. Martindale, the Complete Drug Reference, 33rd Edition, Page No. 455-456.
15. rd Edition, 2004:P.No.1299-1300.
16. http://www.drugs.com/cons/Montelukast.html.
17. H. Amir. Buccal Mucosa as route for systemic drug delivery, A review J. Pharm Sci. 1998; 1(1): 15-30.
18. A. Semalty, M. Bhojwani, G.K.Bhatt, G.D. Gupta, A.K. Shrinivas. Design and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal film of diltiazem hydrochloride. Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 2005; 67(5):548-552.
19. Mona Semalty, A. Semalty, G. Kumar. Formulation and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal films of glipizide. Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 2008 Jan-Feb; 43-48.
20. R.C. Doijad, F.V. Manvi, R. Malleswara and P.S. Patel. Bucoadhesive drug delivery system of isosorbide dinitrate: Formulation and evaluation. Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 2006; 68(6):744-748.
21. L. Perioli, V. Ambrogi, F. Angelici, M. Ricci, S. Giovagnoli, M. Capuccella, C. Rossi. Development of mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of ibuprofen. J Control Release. 2004; 97:269-79.
22. R. Khurana, A. Ahuja, R.K. Khar. Development and evaluation of mucoadhesive films of miconazole nitrate. Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 2000; 447-453.
23. P.M. Dandagi, F.V. Manvi, V.S. Mustiholimath, S.P. Hiremath, and P.T. Thomas. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of Diltiazem hydrochloride buccal films. The Indian Pharmacist, 2005 July; Vol-IV, No.37: 59-62.
24. R. Khanna, S.P. Agarwal, and A. Ahuja. Preparation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal films of clotrimazole for oral Candida infection. Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 1997; 59(6): 299-305.
25. C. Eouani, P.H. Piccerelle, P. Prinderre, J. Joachim. In vitro comparative study of buccal mucoadhesive performance of different polymeric films. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001; 52:45-55.
26. S. Senel, G. Ikinci, S. Kas, A. Yousefi-Rad, M.F. Sargon, A.A. Hincal. Chitosan films and hydrogels of chlorhexidine gluconate for oral mucosal delivery. Int J Pharm. 2000; 193:197-203.
27. A. Talesara, V.S. Patidar, M.S. Rathore, D.K. Sharma and A. Jain. Preparation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal films of carvedilol. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2007 April-June; 77-82