A polymorphic context frame to support scalability and evolvability of information system development processes

ICEIS 2004 - Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 131-138

  Mirbel, Isabelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NICE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS   (France)

Author keywords

Evolution; Fragment; Information System; Method Engineering; Reuse

Indexed keywords

HEURISTIC METHODS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCESS CONTROL; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EVOLUTION; FRAGMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; METHOD ENGINEERING; REUSE;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 8444251015     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Boehm, B. (1988). A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer, 21:61-72.
2. Brinkkemper, S., Saeki, M., and Harmsen, F. (1998). Assembly techniques for method engineering. In 10th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Pisa, Italy.
3. Cauvet, C., Rieu, D., Fron-Conte, A., and Ramadour, P. (2001). Ingnierie des systmes d'information, chapter Rutilisation dans I'ingnierie des systmes d'information, pages 115-147. Hermes.
4. Finkelstein, A., Kramer, J., and Goedicke, M. (1990). Viewpoint oriented software developement. In Le gnie logiciel et ses applications, Toulouse, France.
5. Fowler, M. (1997). Analysis Patterns: Reusable Object Models. Object Technology Series. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
6. Franckson, M. and Peugeot, C. (1991). Spcification of the object and process modeling language ESF. Technical Report D122-OPML-1.0.
7. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., and Vlissides, J. (1995). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York, NY.
8. Gnatz, M., Marschall, F., Popp, G., Rausch, A., and Schwerin, W. (2001). Modular process patterns supporting an evolutionary software development process. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2188.
9. Henderson-Sellers, B. and Edwards, J. (1990). The object-oriented systems life cycle. Communications of the ACM, 33(9):142-159.
10. Mirbel, I. and de Rivieres, V. (2002a). Adapting Analysis and Design to Software Context: the JECKO Approach. In 8th International Conference on Object-Oriented Information S ystems.
11. Mirbel, I. and de Rivieres, V. (2002b). Introducing Flexibility in the Heart of Analysis and Design. In 6th world multiconference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics (SCI).
12. Mirbel, I. and de Rivieres, V. (2003). UML and the Unified Process, chapter Towards a UML profile for building on top of running software. IRM Press.
13. Object Management Group (2001). Uml specification.
14. Potts, C. (1989). A generic model for representing design methods. In 11th International Conference on Software Engineering.
15. Ralyte, J. (2001). Ingenierie des methodes a base de composants. PhD thesis, Universite Paris I - Sorbonne.
16. Rolland, C. and Souveyet, C. (1995). An approach for defining ways-of-working. Information Systems Journal.
17. Royce, W. (1970). Managing the development of large software systems: Concepts and techniques. In WESCON.
18. Saeki, M. (2003). Toward automated method engineering: Supporting method assembly in came. In First International Workshop on Engineering methods to support information systems evolution, Geneva, Switzerland.
19. si Said, S. and Rolland, C. (1998). Formalising guidance for the CREWS goal-scenario approach to requirements engineering. In Eight European-Japanese Conference on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases.
20. van Slooten, K. and Hodes, B. (1996). Characterizing IS development projects. In S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. W., editor, IFIP TC8, WG 8.1/8.2, pages 29-44.