Hemodynamic and morphologic changes after portal vein embolization: Differential effects in central and peripheral zones in the liver on multiphasic computed tomography

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 804-810

  Kobayashi, Satoshi ^a   Ng, Chaan S ^a   Kazama, Toshiki ^a   Madoff, David C ^a   Faria, Silvana C ^a   Vauthey, Jean N ^a   Charnsangavej, Chusilp ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Blood supply; Computed tomography; Flow dynamics; Liver; Portal vain; Portal vein, therapeutic embolization

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

BLOOD SUPPLY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EMBOLIZATION; FLOW DYNAMICS; HEMODYNAMIC CHANGES; HEPATIC VEINS; PORTAL VAIN; PORTAL VEIN, THERAPEUTIC EMBOLIZATION; PORTAL VEINS; THERAPEUTIC EMBOLIZATION;

LIVER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON ADENOCARCINOMA; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LIVER METASTASIS; MALE; OVARY CARCINOMA; PORTAL VEIN; PREOPERATIVE TREATMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMALL INTESTINE CARCINOMA;

EID: 8444241548     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200411000-00013     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Sobhonslidsuk A, Reddy KR. Portal vein thrombosis: a concise review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:535-541.
2. Takayasu K, Makuuchi M, Moriya Y. Portal vein obstruction complicating intra-arterial chemoinfusion for hepatic metastases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1990;5:708-713.
3. Itai Y, Hachiya J, Makita K, et al. Transient hepatic attenuation differences on dynamic computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1987;11:461-465.
4. Itai Y, Moss AA, Goldberg HI. Transient hepatic attenuation difference of lobar or segmental distribution detected by dynamic computed tomography. Radiology. 1982;144:835-839.
5. Matsui O, Takashima T, Kadoya M, et al. Segmental staining on hepatic arteriography as a sign of intrahepatic portal vein obstruction. Radiology. 1984;152:601-606.
6. Itai Y, Matsui O. Blood flow and liver imaging. Radiology. 1997;202:306-314.
7. Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al. Immediate increase in arterial blood flow in embolized hepatic segments after portal vein embolization: CT demonstration. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1037-1039.
8. Fujii Y, Shimada H, Endo I, et al. Changes in clinicopathological findings after portal vein embolization. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:1560-1563.
9. Yamakado K, Takeda K, Matsumura K, et al. Regeneration of the unembolized liver parenchyma following portal vein embolization. J Hepatol. 1997;27:871-880.
10. Ishikawa M, Yogita S, Iuchi M, et al. Experimental and clinical studies on liver regeneration following transcatheter portal embolization. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:226-233.
11. Vauthey JN, Chaoui A, Do KA, et al. Standardized measurement of the future liver remnant prior to extended liver resection: methodology and clinical associations. Surgery. 2000;127:512-519.
12. Abdalla EK, Hicks ME, Vauthey JN. Portal vein embolization: rationale, technique and future prospects. Br J Surg. 2001;88:165-175.
13. Hemming AW, Reed AI, Howard RJ, et al. Prospective portal vein embolization for extended hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2003;237:686-693.
14. Abdalla EK, Barnett CC, Doherty D, et al. Extended hepatectomy in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies with and without preoperative portal vein embolization. Arch Surg. 2002;137:675-681.
15. Freeny PC, Marks WM. Hepatic perfusion abnormalities during CT angiography: detection and interpretation. Radiology. 1986;159:685-691.
16. Hellekant C. Vascular complications following needle puncture of the liver. Clin Angiogr Acta Radiol. 1976;17:209-222.
17. Madoff DC, Hicks ME, Abdalla EK, et al. Portal vein embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles and coils in preparation for major liver resection for hepatobiliary malignancy: safety and effectiveness-study in 26 patients. Radiology. 2003;227:251-260.
18. Madoff DC, Hicks ME, Vauthey JN, et al. Transhepatic portal vein embolization: anatomy, indications, and technical considerations. Radiographics. 2002;22:1063-1076.
19. Ferguson DJ. Hemodynamics in surgery for portal hypertension. Ann Surg. 1963;158:383-386.
20. Ternberg JL, Butcher HR, Jr. Blood-flow relation between hepatic artery and portal vein. Science. 1965;150:1030-1031.
21. Bookstein JJ, Cho KJ, Davis GB, et al. Arterioportal communications: observations and hypotheses concerning transsinusoidal and transvasal types. Radiology. 1982;142:581-590.
22. Terada T, Takegoshi T, Doishita K, et al. Histological study of intrahepatic cavernous transformation in a patient with primary myelofibrosis and portal venous thrombosis. Virchows Arch. 1988;412:339-345.
23. Takayasu K, Moriyama N, Muramatsu Y, et al. Transient perihilar attenuation difference in the liver on dynamic CT secondary to portal vein thrombosis: report of two cases. Gastroenterol Jpn. 1989;24:205-208.
24. Mathieu D, Vasile N, Dibie C, et al. Portal cavernoma: dynamic CT features and transient differences in hepatic attenuation. Radiology. 1985;154:743-748.
25. Nakanuma Y, Tsuneyama K, Ohbu M, et al. Pathology and pathogenesis of idiopathic portal hypertension with an emphasis on the liver. Pathol Res Pract. 2001;197:65-76.