On estimating the amount of learning materials: A case study

ICEIS 2003 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

Volumn 4, Issue , 2003, Pages 127-135

  Tyrväinen, Pasi ^a   Järvenpää, Matti ^a   Sievänen, Ari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Communication forms; Digital media; E learning; Metrics

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL COMPUTERS; DIGITAL STORAGE; E-LEARNING; INVESTMENTS; TEACHING;

ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION; COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; IT INVESTMENTS; LEARNING MATERIALS; METRICS; TEACHING AND LEARNING;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 8444239115     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Bazerman, C., 1994. Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions, in Freedman, A. and Medway, P. (ed.) Genre and the New Rhetoric London, Taylor & Francis, 79-101.
2. Berghout, E. and Renkema, T., 2001. Methodologies for IT investment evaluation: a review and assessment, in van Grembergen, W. Information Technology Evaluation Methods and Management, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishin, 78-97.
3. Campbell, K. 2000. E-Learning: Fact or Fiction? Dynamic Business Magazine. March 2000. Retrieved from http://www.smc.org/.
4. Cisco, 2001. E-Learning for ISO Compliance, available at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/elea rning/educate/cases/iso.pdf, dated August 24. 2001
5. Fallah, M & Ubell, R. 2000. Blind scores in a graduate test: Conventional compared with web-based outcomes. ALN Magazine, 4(2), 1-5.
6. Feuerstein, R. 1980. Instrumental Enrichment: An Intervention Program for Cognitive Modifiability. Baltimore: University Park Press.
7. Fitzpatrick, R. 2001. Is distance education better than the traditional classroom?
8. Johnson, S., Aragon, N. & Palma-Rivas, N. 2000. Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11, 29-49.
9. Karjalainen, A., Päivärinta, T., Tyrväinen, P., and Rajala, J. 2000, Genre-Based Metadata for Enterprise Document Management, in HICSS-33, the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: Los Alamitos CA, IEEE Computer Society.
10. Knight, J., Ridley, D. R., & Davies, E. S. 1998. Assessment of student academic achievement in an on-line program. Presented in Annual Forum of Association for Institutional Research, May 1998, Minneapolis, MN.
11. Landauer, T. K., 1986. How much do people remember? Some estimates on the quantity of learned information in long-term memory, Cognitive Science, 10 (4) Oct-Dec. 1986. 477-493.
12. McNurlin, B. and Spraque, R. 2001, Information Systems management in Practice, Prentice Hall.
13. Pack, T., 2002. Corporate Learning Gets Digital. EContent, Jul2002, Vol. 25 Issue 7.
14. Päivärinta, T., Halttunen, V., and Tyrväinen, P., 2001, A Genre-Based Method for Information Systems Planning, in Information Modelling in the New Millennium: Hershey PA, Idea Group, 70-93.
15. Ridley, D. R. 1998. The 1998 assessment report on CNU on-line. Presented at State Council of Higher Education for Virginia, June 1998. Newport News, VA.
16. Ruttenberg, A. & Ruttenberg, R. 2000. Railway Workers Hazardous Materials Tarining Program: Evaluation of On-line Eight-Hour Awareness Training Pilot. Unpublished Paper: George Meany Center for Labor Studies-National Labor College. Bethesda, MD.
17. Sonner, B. 1999. Success in the capstone business course - assessing the effectiveness of distance learning. Journal of Education for Business, 7, 243-248.
18. Tucker, S. 2001. Distance education: Better, worse, or as good as traditional education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4. 4.
19. Tyrväinen, P., 2003, Estimating Applicability of New Mobile Content Formats to Organizational Use. In HICSS-36, 36rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society.
20. th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, ICEIS Press.
21. Van Grembergen, W., 2002 Information Systems Evaluation Management, IRM Press.
22. Waschull, S. B. 1997. Teaching and learning over the WWW. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Alliance of Community and technical Colleges, Biloxi, MS, September 1997.
23. Yates, J. and Orlikowski, W. J. 1992, Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media, Academy of Management Review, 17, 2, 299-326.
24. Yates, J., Orlikowski, W. J. and Okamura, K., 1999 Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres in Electronic Communication: Reinforcement and Change of Social Interaction, Organization Science, 10, 1, 83-103.
25. Yoshioka, T., Herman, G., Yates, J., and Orlikowski. W. 2001, Genre taxonomy: A knowledge repository of communicative actions, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 19, 4, 431-456.
26. Zmud, R. W., Lind, M. R. and Young, F. W., 1990. An Attribute Space for Organizational Communication Channels, Information Systems Research, 1, 4, 440-457.