Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: Comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1269-1277

  Meissner, Oliver A ^a   Verrel, Frauke ^b   Tató, Federico ^b   Siebert, Uwe ^b,c   Ramirez, Heldin ^b   Ruppert, Volker ^b   Schoenberg, Stefan O ^a   Reiser, Maximilian ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; IOHEXOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; BYPASS SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT FAILURE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; LEG REVASCULARIZATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STANDARD; STENOSIS; ULTRASOUND SCANNER;

EID: 8444230391     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000137404.44683.75     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Marks J, King TA, Baele H, Rubin J, Marmen C. Popliteal-to-distal bypass for limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg 1992; 15:755-759.
2. Raffetto JD, Chen MN, LaMorte WW, et al. Factors that predict site of outflow target artery anastomosis in infrainguinal revascularization. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35:1093-1099.
3. Rhodes JM, Gloviczki P, Bower TC, Panneton JM, Canton LG, Toomey BJ. The benefits of secondary interventions in patients with failing or failed pedal bypass grafts. Am J Surg 1999; 178:151-155.
4. Kalra M, Gloviczki P, Bower TC, et al. Limb salvage after successful pedal bypass grafting is associated with improved long-term survival. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33:6-16.
5. Singh S, Evans L, Datta D, Gaines P, Beard JD. The costs of managing lower limb-threatening ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 12:359-362.
6. Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg 2000; 31(suppl):S1-S296.
7. Landry GJ, Moneta GL, Taylor LM Jr, et al. Duplex scanning alone is not sufficient imaging before secondary procedures after lower extremity reversed vein bypass graft. J Vasc Surg 1999; 29:270-280.
8. Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Holland GA, Barker CF. Peripheral vascular surgery with magnetic resonance angiography as the sole preoperative imaging modality. J Vasc Surg 1994; 20:861-869.
9. Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Neufang A, et al. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:171-179.
10. Dorweiler B, Neufang A, Kreitner KF, Schmiedt W, Oelert H. Magnetic resonance angiography unmasks reliable target vessels for pedal bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35:766-772.
11. Bertschinger K, Cassina PC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. Surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with three-dimensional MR angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:215-220.
12. Bandyk DF, Cato RF, Towne JB, et al. A low flow velocity predicts failure of femoropopliteal and femorotibial bypass grafts: prospective validation of threshold criteria for intervention in infrainguinal vein grafts undergoing duplex surveillance. Surgery 1985; 98:799-809.
13. Westerband A, Mills JL, Kistler S, Berman SS, Hunter GC, Marek JM. Prospective validation of threshold criteria for intervention in infrainguinal vein grafts undergoing duplex surveillance. Ann Vasc Surg 1997; 11:44-48.
14. Dalman RL, Taylor LM, Jr. Basic data related to infrainguinal revascularization procedures. Ann Vasc Surg 1990; 4:309-312.
15. Whittemore AD, Clowes AW, Couch NP, Mannick JA. Secondary femoropopliteal reconstruction. Ann Surg 1981; 193:35-42.
16. Beidle TR, Brom-Ferral R, Letourneau JG. Surveillance of infrainguinal vein grafts with duplex sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:443-448.
17. Idu MM, Buth J, Hop WC, Cuypers P, van de Pavoordt ED, Tordoir JM. Vein graft surveillance: is graft revision without angiography justified and what criteria should be used? J Vasc Surg 1998; 27:399-411.
18. Brewster DC, LaSalle AJ, Robison JG, Strayhorn EC, Darling RC. Femoropopliteal graft failures. secondary reconstructions. Arch Surg 1983; 118:1043-1047.
19. Moody P, de Cossart LM, Douglas HM, Harris PL. Asymptomatic strictures in femoro. Eur J Vasc Surg 1989; 3:389-392.
20. Decrinis M, Doder S, Stark G, Pilger E. A prospective evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of the ankle/brachial index in the follow-up of superficial femoral artery occlusions treated by angioplasty. Clin Investig 1994; 72:592-597.
21. Ray SA, Minty I, Buckenham TM, Belli AM, Taylor RS, Dormandy JA. Clinical outcome and restenosis angioplasty for ischaemic rest pain. Br J Surg 1995; 82:1217-1221.
22. Idu MM, Buth J, Cuypers P, Hop WC, van de Pavoordt ED, Tordoir JM. Economising vein-graft surveillance programs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998; 15:432-438.
23. Mills JL, Harris EJ, Taylor LM Jr, Beckett WC, Porter JM. The importance of routine surveillance of distal bypass grafts with duplex scanning: a study of 379 reversed vein grafts. J Vasc Surg 1990; 12:379-386.
24. Stierli P, Aeberhard P, Livers M. The role of colour flow duplex screening in infra-inguinal vein grafts. Eur J Vasc Surg 1992; 6:293-298.
25. Foshager MC, Sane SS. Evaluation of lower extremity bypass grafts with use of color duplex sonography. Radiographics 1996; 16:9-25.
26. Treiman GS, Lawrence PF, Galt SW, Kraiss LW. Revision of reversed infrainguinal bypass grafts without preoperative arteriography. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26:1020-1028.
27. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and non-ionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 1990; 175: 621-628.
28. Morsey H, Aslam M, Standfield N. Patients with critical ischemia of the lower limb are at risk of developing kidney dysfunction. Am J Surg 2003; 185:360-363.
29. Willmann JK, Mayer D, Banyai M, et al. Evaluation of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with multi-detector row CT angiography: comparison with duplex US and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2003; 229:465-474.
30. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital the aorta and lower extremity arteries. Radiology 1999; 211: 59-67.
31. Vigen KK, Peters DC, Grist TM, Block WF, Mistretta CA. Undersampled projection-reconstruction imaging contrast-enhanced imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43:170-176.
32. Wang Y, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM, et al. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography from the abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries: combined dynamic two-dimensional and boluschase three-dimensional acquisitions. Invest Radiol 2001; 36:170-177.
33. Reid SK, Pagan-Marin HR, Menzoian JO, Woodson J, Yucel EK. Contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography: prospective comparison to catheter arteriography for treatment planning in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:45-53.
34. Khilnani NM, Winchester PA, Prince MR, et al. Peripheral vascular disease: combined 3D bolus chase and dynamic 2D MR angiography compared with x-ray angiography for treatment planning. Radiology 2002; 224:63-74.
35. Hany TF, Carroll TJ, Omary RA, et al. Aorta and runoff vessels: single-injection MR angiography with automated table movement compared with multi-injection time-resolved MR angiography-initial results. Radiology 2001; 221:266-272.