Surgical coronary revascularization remains relevant in the era of stents

Current Opinion in Cardiology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 589-592

  Cohn, William E ^a  

^a TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Coronary artery bypass; Coronary restenosis; Percutaneous coronary; Stents; Transluminal

Indexed keywords

ANGIOPLASTY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY SURGERY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; GENE THERAPY; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTENOSIS; REVIEW; STENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; HUMANS; STENTS;

EID: 8444221609     PISSN: 02684705     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.hco.0000142472.04595.e5     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA: Patencies of 2127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg 2004, 77:93-101.
2. Nalysnyk L, Fahrbach K, Reynolds MW, et al.: Adverse events in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) trials: a systematic review and analysis. Heart 2003, 89:767-772.
3. Zacharias A, Habib RH, Schwann TA, et al.: Improved survival with radial artery versus vein conduits in coronary bypass surgery with left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery grafting. Circulation 2004, 109:1489-1496.
4. Hueb W, Soares PR, Gersh BJ, et al.: The Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS-II): a randomized, controlled clinical trial of three therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease: one-year results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43:1743-1751.
5. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002, 360:965-970.
6. Holmes DR Jr, Leon MB, Moses JW, et al.: Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis. Circulation 2004, 109:634-640.
7. Legrand VM, Serruys FW, Unger F, et al.: Three-year outcome after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease. Circulation 2004, 109:1114-1120.
8. Schwartz L, Kip KE, Frye RL, et al.: Coronary bypass graft patency in patients with diabetes in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Circulation 2002, 106:2652-2658.
9. Holmes DR Jr, Hirshfeld J Jr, Faxon D, et al.: ACC Expert Consensus document on coronary artery stents: document of the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998, 32:1471-1482.
10. Smith SC Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, et al.: ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1993 Guidelines for Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and interventions. Circulation 2001, 103:3019-3041.
11. Delacretaz E, Meier B: Therapeutic strategy with total coronary artery occlusions. Am J Cardiol 1997, 79:185-187.
12. Hamburger JN, Gijsbers GH, Ozaki Y, et al.: Recanalization of chronic total coronary occlusions using a laser guide wire: a pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997, 30:649-656.
13. Serruys PW, Hamburger JN, Koolen JJ, et al.: Total occlusion trial with angioplasty by using laser guidewire: the TOTAL trial. Eur Heart J 2000, 21:1797-1805.
14. van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, et al.: Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation 2001, 104:1761-1766.
15. Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, et al.: Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2002, 359:1194-1199.
16. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, et al.: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003, 125:797-808.
17. Lloyd CT, Ascione R, Underwood MJ, et al.: Serum S-100 protein release and neuropsychologic outcome during coronary revascularization on the beating heart: A prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000, 119:148-154.
18. Zamvar V, Williams D, Hall J, et al.: Assessment of neurocognitive impairment after off-pump and on-pump techniques for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: prospective randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2002, 325:1268.
19. Grondin CM, Campeau L, Thornton JC, et al.: Coronary artery bypass grafting with saphenous vein. Circulation 1989, 79:124-129.
20. Mann MJ, Whittemore AD, Donaldson MC, et al.: Ex-vivo gene therapy of human vascular bypass grafts with E2F decoy: the PREVENT single-centre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 1999, 354:149371498.
21. Vassiliades TA Jr, Nielsen JL, Lonquist JL: Effects of obesity on outcomes in endoscopically assisted coronary artery bypass operations. Heart Surg Forum 2003, 6:99-101.
22. Vassiliades TA Jr, Rogers EW, Nielsen JL, et al.: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: intermediate-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 2000, 70:1063-1065.
23. Detter C, Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, et al.: Robotically-assisted coronary artery surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass-from first clinical use to endoscopic operation. Med Sci Monit 2002, 8:MT118-MT123.
24. Dogan S, Aybek T, Andressen E, et al.: Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass with robotically enhanced telemanipulation: report of forty-five cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002, 123:1125-1131.
25. Tabaie HA, Graper WP, Reinbolt JA: Clinical investigation: endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with robotic assistance. Heart Surg Forum 2002, 5:328-333.
26. Casula RP, Athanasiou T, Cherian A, et al.: Totally endoscopic robotically enhanced coronary artery bypass on the beating heart. J R Soc Med 2003, 96:400-401.
27. Falk V, Jacobs S, Gummert J, et al.: Robotic coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-the Leipzig experience. Surg Clin North Am 2003, 83:1381-1386.