In prospective study using Specific Quality of Life & Outcomes Response-Venous (SQOR-V) questionnaire the recall bias had the same magnitude as the minimally important difference

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1589-1593

  Lurie, Fedor ^a   Kistner, Robert L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Bias; Chronic venous disease; Patient reported outcomes; Quality of life; Symptoms; Treatment outcomes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECALL; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; VASCULAR DISEASE; VEIN;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; VASCULAR DISEASES; VEINS;

EID: 84355163107     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9910-y     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. MH Meissner B Eklof P Gloviczki JM Lohr F Lurie R Kistner G Moneta TW Wakefield 2007 Mapping the future: organizational, clinical, and research priorities in venous disease Journal of Vascular Surgery 46 Suppl S 84S 93S
2. S Kundu F Lurie SF Millward F Padberg Jr S Vedantham S Elias NM Khilnani W Marston JF Cardella MH Meissner MC Dalsing TW Clark RJ Min 2007 Recommended reporting standards for endovenous ablation for the treatment of venous insufficiency: Joint statement of The American Venous Forum and The Society of Interventional Radiology Journal of Vascular Surgery 46 3 582 589 (Pubitemid 47361633)
3. F Lurie D Creton B Eklof LS Kabnick RL Kistner O Pichot C Sessa S Schuller-Petrovic 2005 Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): Two-year follow-up European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 29 1 67 73 (Pubitemid 39618994)
4. MA Testa 2000 Interpretation of quality-of-life outcomes: Issues that affect magnitude and meaning Medical Care 38 9 Suppl II166 II174
5. JA Husted RJ Cook VT Farewell DD Gladman 2000 Methods for assessing responsiveness: A critical review and recommendations Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53 5 459 468 (Pubitemid 30254341)
6. P Erickson 2000 Assessment of the evaluative properties of health status instruments Medical Care 38 9 Suppl II95 II99
7. JL Brozek GH Guyatt D Heels-Ansdell A Degl'Innocenti D Armstrong CA Fallone I Wiklund SV van Zanten N Chiba AN Barkun EA Akl HJ Schünemann 2009 Specific HRQL instruments and symptom scores were more responsive than preference-based generic instruments in patients with GERD Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62 1 102 110
8. HC de Vet CB Terwee DL Knol LM Bouter 2006 When to use agreement versus reliability measures Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59 10 1033 1039 (Pubitemid 44376776)
9. D Revicki RD Hays D Cella J Sloan 2008 Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61 2 102 109
10. CB Terwee LD Roorda J Dekker SM Bierma-Zeinstra G Peat KP Jordan P Croft HC de Vet 2010 Mind the MIC: Large variation among populations and methods Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63 5 524 534
11. JP Browne JH van der Meulen JD Lewsey DL Lamping NJ Black 2010 Mathematical coupling may account for the association between baseline severity and minimally important difference values Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63 8 865 874
12. RD Crosby RL Kolotkin GR Williams 2004 An integrated method to determine meaningful changes in health-related quality of life Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57 11 1153 1160 (Pubitemid 39573022)
13. GR Norman P Stratford G Regehr 1997 Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 50 8 869 879 (Pubitemid 27423516)
14. B Eklöf RB Rutherford JJ Bergan PH Carpentier P Gloviczki RL Kistner MH Meissner GL Moneta K Myers FT Padberg M Perrin CV Ruckley PC Smith TW Wakefield American Venous Forum International Ad Hoc Committee for Revision of the CEAP Classification 2004 Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statement Journal of Vascular Surgery 40 6 1248 1252 (Pubitemid 40037299)
15. JM Bland DG Altman 1996 Measurement error British Medical Journal 313 7059 744
16. KW Wyrwich WM Tierney FD Wolinsky 1999 Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52 9 861 873 (Pubitemid 29385600)
17. GH Guyatt GR Norman EF Juniper LE Griffith 2002 A critical look at transition ratings Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 55 9 900 908 (Pubitemid 35246561)
18. FJ Oort MR Visser MA Sprangers 2009 Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62 11 1126 1137
19. RD Hays SS Farivar H Liu 2005 Approaches and recommendations for estimating minimally important differences for health-related quality of life measures COPD 2 1 63 67 (Pubitemid 40776225)
20. U Maurins BH Hoffmann C Lösch KH Jöckel E Rabe F Pannier 2008 Distribution and prevalence of reflux in the superficial and deep venous system in the general population-results from the Bonn Vein Study, Germany Journal of Vascular Surgery 48 3 680 687
21. DL Lamping S Schroter X Kurz SR Kahn L Abenhaim 2003 Evaluation of outcomes in chronic venous disorders of the leg: Development of a scientifically rigorous, patient-reported measure of symptoms and quality of life Journal of Vascular Surgery 37 2 410 419 (Pubitemid 36236921)