The functional relationship between ectodermal and mesodermal segmentation in the crustacean, Parhyale hawaiensis

Developmental Biology

Volumn 361, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 427-438

  Hannibal, Roberta L ^a,c   Price, Alivia L ^a,b   Patel, Nipam H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Arthropod; Ectoderm; Evolution; Mesoderm; Parhyale hawaiensis; Segmentation

Indexed keywords

CELL MARKER; PH EVEN SKIPPED PROTEIN; PH TWIST PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL DIVISION; CELL MIGRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRUSTACEA; ECTODERM; EMBRYO; EMBRYO SEGMENTATION; MESODERM; NONHUMAN; PARHYALE HAWAIENSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; STEM CELL;

ANNELIDA; ARTHROPODA; CHORDATA; CRUSTACEA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENDOPTERYGOTA; HEXAPODA; PANCRUSTACEA; PARHYALE; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84355161557     PISSN: 00121606     EISSN: 1095564X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.09.033     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akam M. The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Development 1987, 101:1-22.
2. Azpiazu N., Lawrence P.A., Vincent J.P., Frasch M. Segmentation and specification of the Drosophila mesoderm. Genes Dev. 1996, 10:3183-3194.
3. Blair S.S. Interactions between mesoderm and ectoderm in segment formation in the embryo of a glossiphoniid leech. Dev. Biol. 1982, 89:389-396.
4. Bock E. Wechselbeziehung zwischen den Keimblattern bei der Organbildung von Chrysopa perla (L.). Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl. Mech. Org. 1942, 141:159-247.
5. Browne W.E., Price A.L., Gerberding M., Patel N.H. Stages of embryonic development in the amphipod crustacean, Parhyale hawaiensis. Genesis 2005, 42:124-149.
6. Budd G.E. Why are arthropods segmented?. Evol. Dev. 2001, 3:332-342.
7. Correia K.M., Conlon R.A. Surface ectoderm is necessary for the morphogenesis of somites. Mech. Dev. 2000, 91:19-30.
8. Davis G.K., Patel N.H. The origin and evolution of segmentation. Trends Cell Biol. 1999, 9:M68-M72.
9. Davis G.K., D'Alessio J.A., Patel N.H. Pax3/7 genes reveal conservation and divergence in the arthropod segmentation hierarchy. Dev. Biol. 2005, 285:169-184.
10. Dequéant M.-L., Pourquié O. Segmental patterning of the vertebrate embryonic axis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9:370-382.
11. Detwiler S.R. An experimental study of spinal nerve segmentation in Amblystoma with reference to the plurisegmental contribution to the brachial plexus. J. Exp. Zool. 1934, 67:395-441.
12. Frasch M. Intersecting signaling and transcriptional pathways in Drosophila heart specification. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 1999, 10:61-71.
13. Frasch M., Hoey T., Rushlow C., Doyle H., Levine M. Characterization and localization of the even-skipped protein of Drosophila. EMBO J. 1987, 6:749-759.
14. Gerberding M., Browne W.E., Patel N.H. Cell lineage analysis of the amphipod crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis reveals an early restriction of cell fates. Development 2002, 129:5789-5801.
15. Gibb S., Maroto M., Dale J.K. The segmentation clock mechanism moves up a notch. Trends Cell Biol. 2010, 20:593-600.
16. Goto A., Kitamura K., Shimizu T. Cell lineage analysis of pattern formation in the Tubifex embryo. I. Segmentation in the mesoderm. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 1999, 43:317-327.
17. Haget A. Analyse expérimentale des facteurs de la morphogenèse embryonnaire chez le coléoptère Leptinotarsa. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 1953, 87:123-217.
18. Keynes R.J., Stern C.D. Segmentation in the vertebrate nervous system. Nature 1984, 310:786-789.
19. Lewis J., Chevallier A., Kieny M., Wolpert L. Muscle nerve branches do not develop in chick wings devoid of muscle. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 1981, 64:211-232.
20. Liubicich D.M., Serano J.M., Pavlopoulos A., Kontarakis Z., Protas M.E., Kwan E., Chatterjee S., Tran K.D., Averof M., Patel N.H. Knockdown of Parhyale Ultrabithorax recapitulates evolutionary changes in crustacean appendage morphology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:13892-13896.
21. Martinez-Arias A., Lawrence P.A. Parasegments and compartments in the Drosophila embryo. Nature 1985, 313:639-642.
22. McGinnis W., Krumlauf R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 1992, 68:283-302.
23. Nakamoto A., Arai A., Shimizu T. Cell lineage analysis of pattern formation in the Tubifex embryo. II. Segmentation in the ectoderm. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2000, 44:797-805.
24. Palmeirim I., Dubrulle J., Henrique D., Ish-Horowicz D., Pourquie O. Uncoupling segmentation and somitogenesis in the chick presomitic mesoderm. Dev. Genet. 1998, 23:77-85.
25. Patel N.H. Imaging neuronal subsets and other cell types in whole-mount Drosophila embryos and larvae using antibody probes. Methods Cell Biol. 1994, 44:445-487.
26. Patel N., Martin-Blanco E., Coleman K., Poole S., Ellis M., Kornberg T., Goodman C. Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids, and chordates. Cell 1989, 58:955-968.
27. Pavlopoulos A., Averof M. Establishing genetic transformation for comparative developmental studies in the crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102:7888-7893.
28. Pavlopoulos A., Kontarakis Z., Liubicich D.M., Serano J.M., Akam M., Patel N.H., Averof M. Probing the evolution of appendage specialization by Hox gene misexpression in an emerging model crustacean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:13897-13902.
29. Peel A. The evolution of arthropod segmentation mechanisms. Bioessays 2004, 26:1108-1116.
30. Peel A., Akam M. Evolution of segmentation: rolling back the clock. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:R708-R710.
31. Pourquié O. Vertebrate somitogenesis: a novel paradigm for animal segmentation?. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2003, 47:597-603.
32. Price A.L., Patel N.H. Investigating divergent mechanisms of mesoderm development in arthropods: the expression of Ph-twist and Ph-mef2 in Parhyale hawaiensis. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 2008, 310B:24-40.
33. Price A.L., Modrell M.S., Hannibal R.L., Patel N.H. Mesoderm and ectoderm lineages in the crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis display intra-germ layer compensation. Dev. Biol. 2010, 341:256-266.
34. Rao Y., Vaessin H., Jan L.Y., Jan Y.N. Neuroectoderm in Drosophila embryos is dependent on the mesoderm for positioning but not for formation. Genes Dev. 1991, 5:1577-1588.
35. Regier J.C., Shultz J.W., Zwick A., Hussey A., Ball B., Wetzer R., Martin J.W., Cunningham C.W. Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature 2010, 463:1079-1083.
36. Rehm E.J., Hannibal R.L., Chaw R.C., Vargas-Vila M.A., Patel N.H. The crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis: a new model for arthropod development. Emerging Model Organisms: a Laboratory Manual, Volume 1 2009, 373-404. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York. D.A. Crotty, A. Gann (Eds.).
37. Sander K. Specification of the basic body pattern in insect embryogenesis. Adv. Insect Physiol. 1976, 12:125-238.
38. Scholtz G. The Formation, differentiation and segmentation of the post-naupliar germ band of the amphipod Gammarus pulex L. (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Peracarida). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1990, 163-211.
39. Seaver E.C. Segmentation: mono- or polyphyletic?. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2003, 47:583-595.
40. Tautz D. Segmentation. Dev Cell. 1994, 7:301-312.
41. Telford M.J., Budd G.E. The place of phylogeny and cladistics in Evo-Devo research. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2003, 47:479-490.
42. Vargas-Vila M.A., Hannibal R.L., Parchem R.J., Liu P.Z., Patel N.H. A prominent requirement for single-minded and the ventral midline in the dorsoventral axis of the crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis. Development 2010, 137:3469-3476.
43. Weisblat D.A., Shankland M. Cell lineage and segmentation in the leech. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1985, 312:39-56.