Effects of individual differences on driving behavior and traffic flow characteristics

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2248, 2011, Pages 1-9

  Rong, Jian ^a   Mao, Kejun ^a   Ma, Jianming ^b  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Texas Department of Transportation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLUSTER ANALYSIS;

DRIVING BEHAVIOUR; DRIVING SIMULATOR; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; LEVEL OF SERVICE; TRAFFIC CRASHES; TRAFFIC FLOW; TRAFFIC FLOW CHARACTERISTICS; TRAFFIC SIMULATIONS; VEHICLE DESIGN; VEHICLE SAFETY;

VEHICLE SAFETY;

EID: 84255199264     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2248-01     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Lownes, N. E., and R. B. Machemehl. Sensitivity of Simulated Capacity to Modification of VISSIM Driver Behavior Parameters. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1988, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 102-110. (Pubitemid 46325530)
2. Yannes, C. D., and N. E. Lownes. Identifying Capacity Interactions in Response to Simulated Driver Behavior. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
3. Pueboobpaphan, R., and B. van Arem. Driver and Vehicle Characteristics and Platoon and Traffic Flow Stability: Understanding the Relation-ship for Design and Assessment of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2189, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 88-97.
4. Gomes, G., A. May, and R. Horowitz. Congested Freeway Microsimulation Model Using VISSIM. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1876, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2004, pp. 71-81. (Pubitemid 40400510)
5. Brockfeld, E., R. D. Kühne, and P. Wagner. Calibration and Validation of Microscopic Models of Traffic Flow. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1934, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 179-187.
6. Knipling, R. R., E. C. B. Olsen, and T. D. Prailey. Individual Differences and the "High-Risk" Commercial Driver. Commercial Truck and Bus Safety Synthesis Program, Washington, D.C. www.national-academies. org/trb/bookstore. Accessed June 18, 2010.
7. Vladisavljevic, I., J. M. Cooper, P. T. Martin, and D. L. Strayer. Importance of Integrating Driving and Traffic Simulations: Case Study of Impact of Cell Phone Drivers on Traffic Flow. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
8. Greenwood, M., and H. M. Woods. The Incidence of Industrial Accidents upon Individuals with Special Reference to Multiple Accidents. Report 4. Industrial Fatigue Research Board, Medical Research Committee, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1919.
9. Motor Vehicle Driver Physical Condition and Evaluation Requirements. GB 18463-2001. China Standard Press, Beijing, 2001.
10. Liu, D. H., and N. Li. SPSS 15.0 Statistical Analysis. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 2009.
11. Zhang, Z., J. Rong, and F. Ren. Review of Car-Following Model Research. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, Vol. 21, No. 18, 2004, pp. 108-113.
12. Li, D. H. Research on Drivers' Difference and Simulation in Traffic Flow. PhD dissertation. Beijing University of Technology, 2008.
13. Rong, J. Capacity of Basic Expressway Sections. PhD dissertation. Beijing University of Technology, 1999.