Functionality evaluation of ubiquitous service ontology for dynamic service composition

Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering

Volumn 114 LNEE, Issue , 2012, Pages 475-485

  Lee, Meeyeon ^a   Lee, Jung Won ^b   Moon, Nammee ^c   Park, Seung Soo ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^b Ajou University   (South Korea)

^c Hoseo University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Dynamic service composition; Evaluation metric; Service ontology; Service oriented architecture; Ubiquitous computing

Indexed keywords

COMPUTING SYSTEM; DESIGN QUALITY; DESIGN TIME; DYNAMIC SERVICE COMPOSITION; EVALUATION INDICATORS; EVALUATION METRICS; EVALUATION MODELS; EVALUATION RESULTS; MODELING METHODOLOGY; ONTOLOGY BUILDING; QUALITY METRICS; QUALITY MODELS; SERVICE DESCRIPTION; SERVICE ONTOLOGY; SERVICE ORIENTED; SOFTWARE PRODUCTS; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT; UBIQUITOUS ENVIRONMENTS; UBIQUITOUS SERVICE;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DESIGN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION SERVICES; ONTOLOGY; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF SERVICE; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA);

EID: 84255178229     PISSN: 18761100     EISSN: 18761119     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2792-2_45     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Chakraborty D, Perich F, Joshi A, Yesha Y (2002) A reactive service composition architecture for pervasive computing environments. In: 7th Personal Wireless Communications Conference, pp 53-62
2. Chakraborty D, Joshi A (2001) Dynamic service composition: state-of-the-art and research directions. Technical Report TR-CS-01-19, University of Maryland
3. Lee M, Lee JW, Park SS, Cho W (2008) Ontology-based service description and overloading method for ubiquitous computing. J Korea Inf Process Soc 15B(5):465-476
4. Lee M, Lee JW, Park SS, Cho W (2010) SOA-based service layering for facilitating dynamic service composition and alternative service discovery. J Inf Sci Eng 26(3):991-1010
5. Erl T (2005) Service-oriented architecture: concepts technology and design. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
6. Gomez-Perez A (1995) Some ideas and examples to evaluate ontologies. In: 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, pp 299-305
7. Tartir S, Arpinar IB, Sheth AP (2008) Ontological Evaluation and Validation Theory and Applications of Ontology 2. Springer-Berlin,
8. O'Sullivan J, Edmond D, Hofstede AHM (2002) Service description: a survey of the general nature of services Technical Report. Queensland University of Technology,
9. Martin D, Burstein M, Hobbs J, Lassila O, McDermott D, Mcllraith S, Narayanan S, Paolucci M, Parsia B, Payne T, Sirin E, Srinivasan N, Sycara K (2004) OWL-S: semantic markup for web services. W3C Member Submission
10. McGuinness DL, Hamelen F (2004) OWL web ontology language overview. W3C Member Submission
11. ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 9126-1 Software engineering-product quality-part 1: quality model. ISO/IEC Technical Report (2001)
12. ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 9126-2 Software engineering-product quality-part 2: external metrics. ISO/IEC Technical Report (2003)
13. ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 9126-3 Software engineering-product quality-part 3: internal metrics. ISO/IEC Technical Report (2003)
14. ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 9126-4 Software engineering-product quality-part 4: quality in use metrics. ISO/IEC Technical Report (2004)
15. Bansiya J, Davis CG (2002) A hierarchical model for object-oriented design quality assessment. IEEE Trans Software Eng 28(1):4-17
16. Shim B, Choue S, Kim S, Park S (2008) A design quality model for service-oriented architecture. In: 15th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, pp.403-410
17. Oh S, Kim S, Rhew S (2007) UCQM: a quality model for practical evaluation of ubiquitous computing systems. J Korean Inst Inf Sci Eng Softw Appl 34(4):342-358
18. Lee S, Shin D (2008) Web service QoS in multi-domain. In: 10th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, pp 1759-1762
19. Ko JM, Kim CO, Kwon IH (2008) Quality-of-service oriented web service composition algorithm and planning architecture. J Sys Softw 81(11):2079-2090
20. Prahmkaew S (2010) Performance evaluation of convergence ad hoc networks. J Converg 1(1):101-106
21. Malakuti S, Aksit M, Bockisch C (2011) Runtime verification in distributed computing. J Converg 2(1):1-10
22. Shah SNM, Mahmood AKB, Oxley A (2011) Development and performance analysis of grid resource allocation methods. Int J Inf Technol Commun Converg 1(3):331-355
23. Halim Z, Baig AR, Mujtaba H (2010) Measuring entertainment and automatic generation of entertaining games. Int J Inf Technol Commun Converg 1(1):92-107
24. Erl T (2007) SOA Principles of service design, Prentice Hall, New Jercy
25. Protégé, http://protege.stanford.edu/